interference | opensource distributed database with base JPA implementation | SQL Database library

After time spent with the support ticket we found some info. So I will post my findings here in case it helps someone.

The actor events use a resubscription model to make sure they are still connected to the actor. Default this is done every 20 seconds. This meant a lot of resources were being used and eventually the whole system overloaded with loads of idle threads waiting to resubscribe. You can decrease the load by setting resubscriptionInterval to a higher value when subscribing. The drawback is that it will also mean the client will potentially miss events in the mean time (if a partition is moved).

To counteract the delay in resubscribing it is possible to hook into the lower level service fabric events. The following psuedo code was offered to me in the support call.

1. Register for endpoint change notifications for the actor service

Spring is a huge collection of highly configurable software libraries that can be used to setup (among other things) REST API endpoints and OpenAPI documentation and UI.

Spring Boot is a project to simplify the process of using these libraries by applying an opinionated view of how to run them within a standalone process.

By asking how to run a Spring Boot application within a larger application you are trying to get the benefit of the opinionated setup while violating the assumptions that the setup is based on. I guess in theory it might be possible using some sort of handrolled classloader isolation, but once you've solved the dependency problem you'll probably end up with class version conflicts, issues with configuration locations, etc. In short if it is possible at all the effort of doing so would negate the benefit.

There are two ways of resolving the issue.

1. Use Spring Boot to build your API as a standalone process. Configure the new process to talk to the same database as the existing application. If neccessary factor out any code common to both the existing application and the API (JPA entities, DAO classes etc) into a shared library. If you go with this option you will have the overhead of having to manage multiple kinds of process in your production environment, which is more complex - but has advantages in terms of decoupling scaling, release cycles, restart times. See the debate on microservices (https://martinfowler.com/articles/microservices.html).

2. Use the Spring libraries that provide REST and OpenAPI features as part of your existing application, without using Spring Boot. You'll need to have SpringMVC set up in order to use @RestController annotated classes. If your existing application is a web application that's not too bad (https://docs.spring.io/spring-framework/docs/3.2.x/spring-framework-reference/html/mvc.html). If it's not run in a webserver already you'll have to launch the SpringMVC framework in an embedded webserver (https://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/create-a-java-web-application-using-embedded-tomcat). There's a good article on adding OpenAPI to an MVC application here: https://www.baeldung.com/spring-rest-openapi-documentation.

What stops you from doing this:

Yes it does, as the following tutorial shows

(BTW, multiple wireless interfaces are also supported in INET 3.x)

Someone on the TypeScript Discord helped me come up with the answer:

The reason was that curses library could not correctly initialize, because I had an "unusual" terminal settings (I'm using rxvt-unicode-256color). The following setting

To create a service using systemd :

Create a file in /etc/systemd/system/ called minecraft-server.service with the following content:

There are several ways to interpret this question I think, but in all of them the answer is no. All client-to-client communication in TFF must currently be intermediated by the server.

A little more detail: TFF provides no intrinsics which model 'information exchange' between clients, though in principle such a thing can exist. That is, TFF is designed in such a way that this could be added. However, there are no plans to pursue this path in the immediate future.

since a div is not a link, you can't use the selectors :link nor :visited. By simply removing them from your css, the result is way closer. Of course, you may have to implement a method to replace the use of :link and :visited