assertj-core | library providing easy to use rich typed assertions | Assertion library

 by   joel-costigliola Java Version: Current License: Apache-2.0

kandi X-RAY | assertj-core Summary

kandi X-RAY | assertj-core Summary

assertj-core is a Java library typically used in Testing, Assertion applications. assertj-core has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has build file available, it has a Permissive License and it has medium support. You can download it from GitHub, Maven.

AssertJ is a library providing easy to use rich typed assertions
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              assertj-core has a medium active ecosystem.
              It has 1794 star(s) with 433 fork(s). There are 70 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 6 months.
              There are 104 open issues and 845 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 105 days. There are 28 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of assertj-core is current.

            kandi-Quality Quality

              assertj-core has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

            kandi-Security Security

              assertj-core has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.
              assertj-core code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.
              There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

            kandi-License License

              assertj-core is licensed under the Apache-2.0 License. This license is Permissive.
              Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              assertj-core releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.
              Deployable package is available in Maven.
              Build file is available. You can build the component from source.
              It has 207116 lines of code, 26207 functions and 4703 files.
              It has medium code complexity. Code complexity directly impacts maintainability of the code.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi has reviewed assertj-core and discovered the below as its top functions. This is intended to give you an instant insight into assertj-core implemented functionality, and help decide if they suit your requirements.
            • Helper method to generate a unified diff
            • This method is used to process a list of lines
            • Gets the text for a given delta
            • Download maven wrapper
            • Downloads a file from a URL
            • Read the wrapper URL
            • Asserts that the actual list starts with the given sequence
            • Fails if the actual element starts with the given sequence
            • Parses the diff of a unified diff
            • Checks that the elements have the same size as the expected array
            • Formats the time difference between two dates
            • Applies the given property name to each value found in the array
            • Flatten a list of values to a list of values
            • Flattens the actual list of values and returns the results
            • Resets all defaults
            • Returns a String representation of the configuration
            • Returns the error message
            • Compares two boolean arrays
            • Compares two byte arrays
            • Compares two char arrays
            • Compares two double arrays
            • Asserts that two short arrays have the same size
            • Compares two int arrays
            • Compares two long arrays
            • Compares two float arrays
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            assertj-core Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for assertj-core.

            assertj-core Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for assertj-core.

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            How can we compare two hashmaps with case insensitive on both keys and values
            Asked 2022-Mar-29 at 15:40

            I have two maps with both same values, but differing in case, either in key or in value. While asserting, I need to make it as pass. I know the Treemap with case insensitive option can be used, but it validates the keys alone and not the values. Is there a way that we can compare two maps irrespective of case in both key and value pairs?

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Mar-29 at 15:40

            QUESTION

            Spring Boot Logging to a File
            Asked 2022-Feb-16 at 14:49

            In my application config i have defined the following properties:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Feb-16 at 13:12

            Acording to this answer: https://stackoverflow.com/a/51236918/16651073 tomcat falls back to default logging if it can resolve the location

            Can you try to save the properties without the spaces.

            Like this: logging.file.name=application.logs

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71142413

            QUESTION

            Jooq "generateJooq" causing java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: jakarta.xml.bind.annotation.XmlSchema in Spring Boot App
            Asked 2022-Feb-05 at 12:53

            I am using Gradle 7.3.3 to build a Spring Boot Application that uses jooq to generate Table, POJO, and Record Classes from a pre-existing database schema. When attempting to upgrade jooqVersion from 3.15.5 to 3.16.0, :generateJooq returns the following error:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Feb-02 at 15:35

            The third party gradle plugin to use for jOOQ code generation isn't ready for jOOQ 3.16 yet. A fix is being discussed here: https://github.com/etiennestuder/gradle-jooq-plugin/pull/208

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70947495

            QUESTION

            Maven Integration Testing Framework forces dependency resolution from central repository
            Asked 2022-Jan-14 at 00:30

            I'm using the Maven Integration Testing Framework plugin to test one goal of a custom-developed plugin. As far as the tests go, everything works well. However, there is one unexpected and undesired technicality that I have noticed:

            The local repositories created for individual test cases in target/maven-it/.../test-case/.m2/repository are always populated remotely - from the Maven Central Repository. If I run mvn clean integration-test without being connected to the Internet, the dependency resolution results in an error after a failed connection attempt. I would expect it, however, to look for the dependencies in the "standard" cache located in USER/.m2/repository first, where the dependencies were already present in my experiment.

            It's interesting that even after adding the --offline option to mvn clean integration-test, online dependency resolution is still attempted.

            My main question is - should this be happening? Is this the expected behavior when using the Maven Integration Testing Framework? Or do you think there might be something wrong with the way I'm using it?

            Related dependencies from the pom.xml of the tested custom-developed plugin:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Jan-13 at 20:24

            If the dependencies would be consumed from the users local cache $HOME/.m2/repository it could happen that parts which are already in the local cache influence the integration test. That's one of the the reasons each integration tests is completely separated from each other.

            Furthermore it makes it possible to parallelise the integration tests in an easier way.

            Furthermore you can configure your own settings.xml to consume any dependencies from an repository instead directly from central this would also mean that the integration test would consume their dependencies from that repo.

            Apart from that the usage of the users local cache would make it impossible (or at least much more complicated) to create a local cache with predefined state (which means already existing artifacts) to test particular scenarios.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70702126

            QUESTION

            AssertJ: issue with Assertions.assertThat().usingRecursiveComparison().ignoringFields()
            Asked 2022-Jan-12 at 20:59

            I'm using assertj-core:3.21.0 and JDK 17

            Here is an simple example that fails. This works in JDK 16 and assertj-core:3.19.0.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Jan-12 at 20:59

            QUESTION

            Spring aspects woven by AspectJ compiler working in Maven, but not in IntelliJ IDEA
            Asked 2021-Dec-27 at 01:03

            I'm using Spring boot 2.5.5 with AspectJ 1.9.7 (CTW). I've spotted that sometimes transactions don't roll back and to fix that I need only recompile code and run it again. For example:

            I have method addB() persisting entity B, method addC() throwing exception and method A() combining them. When I call A(), exception is thrown, but entity B stays in database (as expected). When I annotate method A() with @Transactional result is the same. But if I build everything again (without any changes) then transaction is being rollbacked and there is no new record in database.

            Here is my full POM:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Dec-27 at 01:01

            I cannot reproduce the problem because IDEA does not find the Lombok setters. Even when delegating build actions before run to Maven, I get NoSuchMethodError: '...TestEntity.setCode(java.lang.String)'. Next, I am going to try without Lombok. Please note that Lombok and AspectJ do not play nice with each other, see my answer here. Alternatively, you could also make sure that Maven does either of these:

            1. First build with Javac + Lombok, then apply AspectJ binary weaving in a second step, all in one module.
            2. Similar to above, but do the first build step in module A and the second one in a separate module B. Then you have an unwoven and a woven artifact, which you can both use according to your preferences. For example, you could also use the unwoven one and apply transaction aspects via load-time weaving (LTW) while starting the application. See my other answer here for both approaches #1 and #2.
            3. Delombok the source code build the generated sources with the AspectJ compiler in a second build step.

            I generated constructors, getters and setters in the IDE instead of using Lombok. Now the project compiles in both IDE and Maven. It behaves exactly as it should. With @Transactional, 0 entities are created, without it 2.

            I am not sure if Lombok vs. AspectJ really is the problem due to non-compileability when using Lombok annotations, but it should be easy enough to try without Lombok for you. If it works in your context, too, we found the culprit and can think about implementing one of the 3 approaches mentioned above. Then you can tell me if you have any difficulty in doing so.

            Update: I created the two-module version - Javac + Lombok, then Aspect weaving - for you in my fork and also issued pull request #1. I also improved testability a bit. See if that works for you.

            Caveat: You cannot simply run DemoApplication from the application-lombok module, because that module is still unwoven and will not show transactional behaviour. But you can simply change the classpath for the run config to the application-aspectj module:

            Update: As we found out in the comment section of the other answer, in addition to the problematic Lombok vs. AspectJ compiler configuration, the OP also simply had a problem with his IDE: Using IntelliJ IDEA Community Edition, he was first unaware of, then unable to install the AspectJ plugin, which means that IDEA does not know antyhing about the AspectJ compiler and simply overwrites anything which might have been compiled by AspectJ Maven before with plain Java classes. Therefore, transactional aspects do not work either, unless

            • either pre-run compilation is disabled and mvn compile started as an additional pre-build step for the corresponding run configuration,
            • or all build actions for the project are being delegated to Maven via configuration,
            • the OP buys a licence of IDEA Ultimate and installs the AspectJ plugin.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70436706

            QUESTION

            Cannot execute any Mockito test. With JDK17 gives "NoSuchMethodException: sun.misc.Unsafe.defineClass(...) "
            Asked 2021-Dec-20 at 13:30

            When upgrading my app from Spring Boot 2.2 with JDK 11 to Spring Boot 2.5.5 with JDK 17, Mockito gives this error:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Dec-20 at 13:30

            It was an Intelli-J issue!

            So, cleaning the Intelli-J dependency spaghetti up solved it!

            1. File > Invalidate cache ... and restart. Helped a bit.
            2. Closing the Intelli-J project. Then removed manually the ".idea" folder and any *.iml file.

            Yes, I did option 1 previously. Especially doing action 2 solved it within a minute.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70395010

            QUESTION

            LogCaptor fails to capture when using SpringBootTest and Autowired annotation
            Asked 2021-Dec-10 at 21:20

            I have a weird behaviour in my integration test for capturing logs when using the annotation SpringBootTest alongside with autowiring a service. I use LogCaptor to capture logs.

            With a specific setup I am not able to capture logs and I cannot understand why this is happening. I am not sure if I missed something with the spring boot test configuration or if it is something else.

            So let's assume there is a FooService:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Dec-10 at 19:00

            Try below and it should work

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70259059

            QUESTION

            Using QuarkusTestExtension in combination with another JUnit extension leads to exception
            Asked 2021-Nov-24 at 16:08

            Is it possible to use the QuarkusTestExtension from Quarkus in combination with the SoftAssertionsExtension from AssertJ?

            I would like to run a Quarkus test which implicitly calls softAssertions.assertAll() after a test which uses AssertJ's soft assertions. I'm always encountering an exception, though.

            Context:

            I'm using io.quarkus:quarkus-junit5:1.13.3.Final and org.assertj:assertj-core:3.21.0.

            This is the annotation which I`ve created.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Nov-24 at 16:08

            There are two separate problems from my point of view:

            1. AssertJ's SoftAssertionsExtension is not yet supported by Quarkus.
            2. QuarkusTestExtension does not play nicely with composed annotations.

            About the latter, the issue seems to be unrelated to AssertJ. I was able to reproduce it by taking out the SoftAssertionsExtension from the custom QuarkusAssertJTest annotation and executing an empty test.

            Having:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69913807

            QUESTION

            Test are not executed during build time
            Asked 2021-Nov-23 at 08:23

            I use this Maven configuration in order to execute TestNG collection of tests:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Nov-23 at 08:23

            Use maven-surefire-plugin version 2.22.2 instead of 3.0.0-M5:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70041491

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install assertj-core

            You can download it from GitHub, Maven.
            You can use assertj-core like any standard Java library. Please include the the jar files in your classpath. You can also use any IDE and you can run and debug the assertj-core component as you would do with any other Java program. Best practice is to use a build tool that supports dependency management such as Maven or Gradle. For Maven installation, please refer maven.apache.org. For Gradle installation, please refer gradle.org .

            Support

            For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
            CLONE
          • HTTPS

            https://github.com/joel-costigliola/assertj-core.git

          • CLI

            gh repo clone joel-costigliola/assertj-core

          • sshUrl

            git@github.com:joel-costigliola/assertj-core.git

          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link