linulator | : penguin : The Linux Simulator | Security Testing library
kandi X-RAY | linulator Summary
kandi X-RAY | linulator Summary
The goal of this project is to create a fake Linux environment with configurable network ports that can be opened. Linulator can be used as a learning or training environment or even as a honeypot. While operating as a honeypot, it will hopefully attract potential attackers so that their methods can be learned. The environment can be frozen and saved to disk for forensic analysis. Extensive logging can also be employed. Note: This project is still very much a work in progress! There is no virtual filesystem in place yet, SSH is not implemented, and many commands still need to be added. Since the network services Linulator uses typically run on privileged ports and it is not recommended that you run Linulator as root, you should run the services on ports >1024 and configure your firewall to forward or redirect the traffic to the higher-numbered ports. You may also want to run the program within a virtual machine, container, zone, jail, or chroot environment for added security on the host system.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Sets the security policy
- Starts the services
- Parses the configuration
- Load the filesystem
- Prints a cloned file system
- Create the filesystem
- Connect to database
- Creates a clone
- Runs the operating system
- See if there is an argument in the command line
- Runs the server
- Disconnect from the database
- Calculate mtime stamp
- Checks if a path exists
- Reads the text from the passed file as String
- Runs the ECHO server
- Reads the contents of a file as a string
- Runs the event loop
- Determines the type of a file
- Run a system call
- Main method
- Main loop
- Calculates the octal permissions from symbolic permissions
- Write database
- Runs the HTTP server
- Stops the server
linulator Key Features
linulator Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on Security Testing
QUESTION
I have not, but shall DAST* security test, out of curiosity, an IoT device; Nodemcu esp8266 www server I built. It's showing a HTML page (on a mobile phone for example) that allows to control and interact with a camera module and a A/C relay. With it I can for example show images captured in the camera I even think it has some image recognition built in, and I can switch on and off a relay for electrical current to a light bulb (110/220v A/C power)
Before I start pentest I though I better start thinking of what types of exploits one would be able to find and detect? Which sinister exploits I will be able to find, or rather ought be able to find given a proper pentest exercise? (And if I do not find exploits, my approach to the pentest of the Iot might be wrong)
I ponder it might be a totally pointless exercise since the esp8266 www server (or rather its LUA programming libraries) might not have any security built into it, so basically it is "open doors" and everything with it is unsafe ?
The test report might just conclude what I can foresee be that the the "user input needs to be sanitized"?
Anyone have any idea what such pentest of a generic IoT device generally reports? Maybe it is possible to crash or reset the IoT device? Buffer overruns, XXS, call own code ?
I might use ZAP or Burpsuite or similar DAST security test tool.
- I could of course SAST test it instead, or too, but I think it will be hard to find a static code analyzer for the NodeMCU libraries and NUA scripting language easily ? I found some references here though: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8227299 but it seems to be a long read.
So if someone just have a short answer what to expect in a DAST scan/pentest , it would be much appreciated.
Stay safe and secure out there ! Zombieboy
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-08 at 01:04I do my vulnerability scanning with OpenVAS (I assume this is what you mean by pentesting?). I am not aware of any IOT focused Tools.
If your server is running on esp8266, i would imagine that there is no much room for authentication and encryption of http traffic, but correct me if i am wrong).
Vulnerability Scan results might show things like unencrypted http traffic, credentials transmitted in cleartext (if you have any credentials fields in the pages served by the web server) etc. Depending on if there is encryption, you might also see weak encryption findings.
You might get some false positives on your lua webserver reacting like other known webservers when exploits are applied. I have seen this kind of false positive specially on DoS vulnerabilities when a vulnerability scan is testing a vulnerability and the server becomes unresponsive. Depending on how invasive your vulnerability scanner is, you might get a lot of false positives for DoS on such a constrained platform.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install linulator
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page