ReView | help developers and designers | Frontend Framework library

 by   maoruibin Java Version: 1.2.0 License: Apache-2.0

kandi X-RAY | ReView Summary

kandi X-RAY | ReView Summary

ReView is a Java library typically used in User Interface, Frontend Framework, React applications. ReView has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has build file available, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

:art: A view to help developers and designers view the View's font size, color, and border.

            kandi-support Support

              ReView has a low active ecosystem.
              It has 236 star(s) with 24 fork(s). There are 2 watchers for this library.
              It had no major release in the last 12 months.
              There are 0 open issues and 3 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 25 days. There are no pull requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of ReView is 1.2.0

            kandi-Quality Quality

              ReView has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

            kandi-Security Security

              ReView has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.
              ReView code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.
              There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

            kandi-License License

              ReView is licensed under the Apache-2.0 License. This license is Permissive.
              Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              ReView releases are available to install and integrate.
              Build file is available. You can build the component from source.
              ReView saves you 360 person hours of effort in developing the same functionality from scratch.
              It has 859 lines of code, 115 functions and 24 files.
              It has medium code complexity. Code complexity directly impacts maintainability of the code.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi has reviewed ReView and discovered the below as its top functions. This is intended to give you an instant insight into ReView implemented functionality, and help decide if they suit your requirements.
            • Called when an options item is selected
            • Determines if the review is modified
            • Whether the text should be shown or not
            • Whether the border should be shown
            • Override method to override onDraw method
            • Calculate text width
            • Get the show information
            • Initializes the paint info
            • Set the activity to be saved
            • Creates a view to read from the views
            • Updates the options menu
            • OnCreateOptions menu menu
            • Called when the view is drawn
            • Method called to initialize the init view
            • Called when the develop view is initialized
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            ReView Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for ReView.

            ReView Examples and Code Snippets

            Create rejected admission review data .
            javadot img1Lines of Code : 20dot img1License : Permissive (MIT License)
            copy iconCopy
            protected AdmissionReviewData createRejectedAdmissionReview(ObjectNode body, int code, String message) {
                    AdmissionReviewData data;
                    String requestId = body.path("request")
            Adds a review .
            javadot img2Lines of Code : 4dot img2License : Permissive (MIT License)
            copy iconCopy
            public void add(Review review) {
            Set the review value .
            javadot img3Lines of Code : 3dot img3License : Permissive (MIT License)
            copy iconCopy
            public void setReview(String review) {
           = review;

            Community Discussions


            Indexed Initial algebras for GADTs
            Asked 2022-Mar-31 at 09:23

            In his paper Generics for the Masses Hinze reviews encoding of data type.

            Starting from Nat



            Answered 2022-Mar-14 at 18:05

            The difference is the category. Nat is an initial algebra in the category of types. Rep is an initial algebra in the category of indexed types. The category of indexed types has as objects type constructors of kind * -> *, and as morphisms from f ~> g, functions of type forall t. f t -> g t.

            Then Rep is the initial algebra for the functor RepF defined as follows:



            Action Required: Your app is not compliant with Google Play Policies , what is the solution?
            Asked 2022-Mar-30 at 23:42

            Issue found: Invalid Data safety section We reviewed your app's Data safety section in Play Console and found discrepancies between it and how the app collects and shares user data. All apps are required to complete an accurate Data safety section that discloses their data collection and sharing practices - this is a requirement even if your app does not collect any user data.

            We detected user data transmitted off device that you have not disclosed in your app's Data safety section as user data collected.

            Issue details

            We found an issue in the following area(s):

            SPLIT_BUNDLE 2: Policy Declaration for Play Safety Label: Device Or Other IDs Data Type - Device Or Other IDs (some common examples may include Advertising ID, Android ID, IMEI, BSSID)**



            Answered 2022-Mar-03 at 13:15
            1. Open Google Play Console

            2. App content

            3. Data safety => Manage

            4. Overview click next

            5. Answer the questions (then next):

              • Does your app collect or share any of the required user data types? = yes

              • Is all of the user data collected by your app encrypted in transit? = yes

              • Do you provide a way for users to request that their data is deleted? = yes

            6. go to Device or other IDs and check it then next

            7. check Device or other IDs and manage it

            8. answer the questions

              • Is this data collected, shared, or both? = Collected

              • Is this data processed ephemerally? = yes

              • Is this data required for your app, or can users choose whether it's collected? = Users can choose whether this data is collected

              • Why is this user data collected? = check App functionality

            9. then save

            10. click next and save and app will review and approved by play store team



            Google OAuth 2.0 failing with Error 400: invalid_request for some client_id, but works well for others in the same project
            Asked 2022-Mar-30 at 14:21

            We have some apps (or maybe we should call them a handful of scripts) that use Google APIs to facilitate some administrative tasks. Recently, after making another client_id in the same project, I started getting an error message similar to the one described in localhost redirect_uri does not work for Google Oauth2 (results in 400: invalid_request error). I.e.,

            Error 400: invalid_request

            You can't sign in to this app because it doesn't comply with Google's OAuth 2.0 policy for keeping apps secure.

            You can let the app developer know that this app doesn't comply with one or more Google validation rules.

            Request details:

            The content in this section has been provided by the app developer. This content has not been reviewed or verified by Google.

            If you’re the app developer, make sure that these request details comply with Google policies.

            redirect_uri: urn:ietf:wg:oauth:2.0:oob

            How do I get through this error? It is important to note that:

            • The OAuth consent screen for this project is marked as "Internal". Therefore any mentions of Google review of the project, or publishing status are irrelevant
            • I do have "Trust internal, domain-owned apps" enabled for the domain
            • Another client id in the same project works and there are no obvious differences between the client IDs - they are both "Desktop" type which only gives me a Client ID and Client secret that are different
            • This is a command line script, so I use the "copy/paste" verification method as documented here hence the urn:ietf:wg:oauth:2.0:oob redirect URI (copy/paste is the only friendly way to run this on a headless machine which has no browser).
            • I was able to reproduce the same problem in a dev domain. I have three client ids. The oldest one is from January 2021, another one from December 2021, and one I created today - March 2022. Of those, only the December 2021 works and lets me choose which account to authenticate with before it either accepts it or rejects it with "Error 403: org_internal" (this is expected). The other two give me an "Error 400: invalid_request" and do not even let me choose the "internal" account. Here are the URLs generated by my app (I use the ruby google client APIs) and the only difference between them is the client_id - January 2021, December 2021, March 2022.

            Here is the part of the code around the authorization flow, and the URLs for the different client IDs are what was produced on the $stderr.puts url line. It is pretty much the same thing as documented in the official example here (version as of this writing).



            Answered 2022-Mar-02 at 07:56

            steps.oauth.v2.invalid_request 400 This error name is used for multiple different kinds of errors, typically for missing or incorrect parameters sent in the request. If is set to false, use fault variables (described below) to retrieve details about the error, such as the fault name and cause.

            • GenerateAccessToken GenerateAuthorizationCode
            • GenerateAccessTokenImplicitGrant
            • RefreshAccessToken

            Google Oauth Policy



            Preventing backslash in path building on .NET for cross platform deploy
            Asked 2022-Mar-26 at 12:17

            I have a legacy .NET application that I have ported to .NET 6.0 and am executing cross platform (Windows & Linux).

            Much of the legacy code was developed with hard coded path creation, using backslash in strings, like



            Answered 2022-Mar-26 at 12:17

            As there's not a built in way to protect against this at development or execution time, I'm going to add this code to run after my integration tests. It will sweep the filesystem and throw an exception if it finds any files or directories created with an inappropriate character (backslash).

            I wanted to add a check for colon as well, in case folks were creating paths like "c:\feux\barre.txt", but it looks like at least NuGet creates directories with colon (ex. ~/.local/share/NuGet/v3-cache/670c1461c29885f9aa22c281d8b7da90845b38e4$ps:_api.nuget.org_v3_index.json)



            Adding ADO.Net Entity Framework gives "The project's target framework does not contain Entity Framework runtime assemblies"
            Asked 2022-Mar-23 at 18:52

            I've added a new .Net 6.0 project to my solution in VS2022. Installed the EntityFramework 6.4.4. with install-package entityframework and now try to add a ADO.Net Entity Framework Model to the project. I get an error:

            The project's target framework does not contain Entity Framework runtime assemblies. Please review the target framework information on the project's property page.

            I've tried adding several other EF packages (which should not be necessary according to the documentation here: I thought the problem was with my installation but I created a .Net 6.0 console application containing the problem and sent it to a colleague and he got the same message.

            Also found this topic here: Adding Entity Framework Model on Visual Studio 2022 but there's no answer there.

            Steps to reproduce:

            1. Create a .Net 6.0 Console application.
            2. Install the EF6 package using install-package entityframework from the package manager console window.
            3. Right-click solution and choose 'Add' => 'Add item'.
            4. In the left pane click 'Data'.
            5. Choose 'ADO.Net Entity Framework Model.
            6. Click 'Add'.

            The error appears:



            Answered 2022-Jan-05 at 16:33

            The EF 6 tooling onl works on a .NET Framework project, you must add one to your slution and then copy or link to the generated code. In addition, EDMX files in .NET Core projects are not supported, but there are workarounds



            java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: No virtual method setSkipClientToken(Z)V in class Lcom/facebook/GraphRequest;
            Asked 2022-Feb-25 at 23:22

            It was working fine before I have done nothing, no packages update, no gradle update no nothing just created new build and this error occurs. but for some team members the error occur after gradle sync.

            The issue is that build is generating successfully without any error but when opens the app it suddenly gets crash (in both debug and release mode)




            Answered 2022-Feb-25 at 23:22

            We have fixed the issue by replacing



            App Tracking Transparency Dialog does not appear on iOS
            Asked 2022-Feb-12 at 08:07

            Apple reviewer has just rejected my app since ATT request doesn't appear: "We are unable to locate the App Tracking Transparency permission request when reviewed on iOS 15.0.1."

            My code is as shown below:



            Answered 2021-Oct-02 at 21:43

            An Apple person suggests that you request it through applicationDidBecomeActive(_:) in AppDelegate. That's how I fixed the issue for iOS.



            Log4j vulnerability - Is Log4j 1.2.17 vulnerable (was unable to find any JNDI code in source)?
            Asked 2022-Feb-01 at 15:47

            With regard to the Log4j JNDI remote code execution vulnerability that has been identified CVE-2021-44228 - (also see references) - I wondered if Log4j-v1.2 is also impacted, but the closest I got from source code review is the JMS-Appender.

            The question is, while the posts on the Internet indicate that Log4j 1.2 is also vulnerable, I am not able to find the relevant source code for it.

            Am I missing something that others have identified?

            Log4j 1.2 appears to have a vulnerability in the socket-server class, but my understanding is that it needs to be enabled in the first place for it to be applicable and hence is not a passive threat unlike the JNDI-lookup vulnerability which the one identified appears to be.

            Is my understanding - that Log4j v1.2 - is not vulnerable to the jndi-remote-code execution bug correct?


            This blog post from Cloudflare also indicates the same point as from AKX....that it was introduced from Log4j 2!

            Update #1 - A fork of the (now-retired) apache-log4j-1.2.x with patch fixes for few vulnerabilities identified in the older library is now available (from the original log4j author). The site is As of 21-Jan-2022 version has been released. Vulnerabilities addressed to date include those pertaining to JMSAppender, SocketServer and Chainsaw vulnerabilities. Note that I am simply relaying this information. Have not verified the fixes from my end. Please refer the link for additional details.



            Answered 2022-Jan-01 at 18:43

            The JNDI feature was added into Log4j 2.0-beta9.

            Log4j 1.x thus does not have the vulnerable code.



            What to use instead of TaskException for ReviewManager Api?
            Asked 2022-Jan-11 at 08:45

            Trying to follow the google tutorial for in-app reviews and I'm currently stuck with the following piece of code:



            Answered 2022-Jan-11 at 08:45

            I think the documentation has a typo.

            The correct exception cast should be this RuntimeExecutionException

            I've opened a documentation issue about this

            UPDATE: 11/01/2022 (dd/MM/yyyy)

            Upgrading your play:core dependency to at least version 1.10.1 will bring you a new custom ReviewException which should replace the RuntimeExecutionException (or at least this is what we think).

            Without an official answer the current safest solution is probably the one below:



            Python threads difference for 3.10 and others
            Asked 2022-Jan-04 at 21:25

            For some, simple thread related code, i.e:



            Answered 2021-Nov-17 at 14:58

            An answer from a core developer:

            Unintended consequence of Mark Shannon's change that refactors fast opcode dispatching: -- the INPLACE_ADD opcode no longer uses the "slow" dispatch path that checks for interrupts and such.


            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network


            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install ReView

            You can download it from GitHub.
            You can use ReView like any standard Java library. Please include the the jar files in your classpath. You can also use any IDE and you can run and debug the ReView component as you would do with any other Java program. Best practice is to use a build tool that supports dependency management such as Maven or Gradle. For Maven installation, please refer For Gradle installation, please refer .


            For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
          • HTTPS


          • CLI

            gh repo clone maoruibin/ReView

          • sshUrl


          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link