myplanet | 🌕 myPlanet android app reads data from 🌎 for offline use | Database library

Because you check if a match is found or not for every dictionary. Assuming there are a few planets and you find a match, you keep iterating to the next planet and when it doesn't match you will get to the else statement. You might want to unindent the else and add a break to the if to create a for/else construct:

you have to loop through all Table Rows and Table cells, throw them together in an array and compare the numbers then for the lowest and highest.

I will give you 2 Solutions for the styling, first one (better choice) via seperate css file styling, second one via inline jQuery Styling.

Here is an working example how it can be solved: https://jsfiddle.net/efmkr08t/1/

i have defined the persistent volume and persistent volume claim manually using following codes but did not connect to any pods. Should i do that?

So you didn't refer to it in any way then in your Pod definition till now, right ? At least I cannot see it anywhere in your Deployment. If so, the answer is: yes, you must do that so that Pods in your cluster can use it.

Let's start from the beginning. Basically the whole process of configuring a Pod (applies also to Pod template in Deployment definition) to use a PersistentVolume for storage consists of 3 steps [source]:

1. A cluster administrator creates a PersistentVolume that is backed by physical storage. The administrator does not associate the volume with any Pod.

2. A cluster user creates a PersistentVolumeClaim, which gets automatically bound to a suitable PersistentVolume.

3. The user creates a Pod ( it can be also a Deployment in which you define a certain Pod template specification ) that uses the PersistentVolumeClaim as storage.

It makes no sense to describe here in detail all above mentioned steps as it was already done very well here.

You can verify the PV/PVC availability using the following commands:

kubectl get pv volume-name on this stage should show the status of your volume as Bound

the same with kubectl get pvc task-pv-claim ( in your case kubectl get pvc cdiworkspace however I would recommend to use different name e.g. cdiworkspace-claim for PersistentVolumeClaim so it can be easily differentiated from PersistentVolume itself) - this command also should show the status of Bound

Please notice that the Pod’s configuration file specifies only PersistentVolumeClaim, but it does not specify a PersistentVolume itself. From the Pod’s point of view, the claim is a volume. Here is a nice description which clearly marks the difference between those two objects [source]:

A PersistentVolume (PV) is a piece of storage in the cluster that has been provisioned by an administrator or dynamically provisioned using Storage Classes. It is a resource in the cluster just like a node is a cluster resource. PVs are volume plugins like Volumes, but have a lifecycle independent of any individual pod that uses the PV. This API object captures the details of the implementation of the storage, be that NFS, iSCSI, or a cloud-provider-specific storage system.

A PersistentVolumeClaim (PVC) is a request for storage by a user. It is similar to a pod. Pods consume node resources and PVCs consume PV resources. Pods can request specific levels of resources (CPU and Memory). Claims can request specific size and access modes (e.g., can be mounted once read/write or many times read-only).

Below example of specification in Pod / Deployment definition which refers to existing PersistentVolumeClaim:

I handled draggable views by creating a UIView subclass, adding a UIPanGestureRecognizer and updating based on its inputs.

Using this method, whichever view is on top will receive the touch and you don't have to override hitTest on the superview.

I also added a delegate to update constraints if the view is constrained to the superview. By setting the delegate the UIView or ViewController (whichever is delegate) can update the constraints for the views you want to move.

Here's a simple implementation:

The reason you're seeing weird results is because of how JavaScript handles the comma. For example case "Sun", "sun": Doesn't check if the case is sun or Sun, it creates a string "sun" the compares against "Sun". There are no limits on switch statements, however they are not great for "most" cases. If you want to rewrite this to check for multiple spellings you can do one of two ways, at least that I can think of.

Reverse your switch statement