Web-Client | Generic Linked Data browser and UX component framework | JSON Processing library

Wasm backend of TeaVM does not support JSO interop layer. It also supports subset of features available in JavaScript backend. So there's no way to make TeaVM Flavour work in Wasm, instead your should prefer JavaScript target. If you want to learn how to deal with Wasm BE, you can take a look at example.

Wasm has proven to be extremely inappropriate to run Java, so I recommend to use JavaScript BE of TeaVM. Also, please note that official site (htts://teavm.org) lists links where you can get help (google groups, gitter, direct email). I don't follow StackOverflow questions about TeaVM and don't receive notifications from SO.

Quarkus can be reactive or non reactive, it depends which extensions you choose to use.

Hibernate ORM Panache is for when you want to access the database in a non reactive way using Hibernate ORM and Panache. The same is true for JDBC, it's not reactive so you have to use something else if you want your whole app to be reactive.

In this scenario, you probably want to try these two extensions:

• quarkus-hibernate-reactive-panache: See the Hibernate Reactive with panache quickstart for an example
• quarkus-reactive-mysql-client: For allowing reactive access to the db. See the guide for Vert.x SQL Clients on the quarkus website

On the Quarkus website, there is also an intro on reactive for Quarkus.

Example of how to use the Vert.x SQL client from the guide:

pydicom offers some utility functions to handle the DICOM data dictionary:

You are missing the vertx-web as a dependency.

To fix the compilation issues you need to add:

I would have a look at the Device Flow, which is designed for cases where a device doesn't have a browser. This involves the user logging on via a separate device while the limited device polls the Authorization Server.

This Curity Article + Video provides a pretty good overview. Identity Server will have support for this also. I don't claims to known much about Android Smart Glasses though :)

According to my knowledge, the problem is that the resource you require on the CPU for the Azure Container Instance is over the limit of the East US. See the limit here. The max CPU for the East US is 4. But you require 9.

Of course, you can use the maximum allocation to limit the CPU. But I think it's not enough for all of your services. And the ACI is known for its Lightweight. If you need to expose multiple ports to the outside, I recommend you use the AKS to deploy your services, it's more suitable.

why multi-stage builds don't run in parallel in the way I expected without BuildKit.

That's the high point of BuildKit.

The main purpose of the multistage in Docker is to produce smaller images by keeping only what's required by the application to properly work. e.g.

Any TCP-based server has a bind address that says what interfaces it wants to listen to. In your example code, you server.listen(port, "localhost") which causes the server to only be reachable on the loopback interface, via the 127.0.0.1 special IP address. However, in Docker, each container has its own private loopback interface, so this setting makes the container unreachable from anywhere else.

There is a special value for the bind address, 0.0.0.0, which means "listen on all interfaces". This is usually the default value when it's configurable (and indeed it's the default for the Node server.listen function). You need to change the localhost bind address to 0.0.0.0, or just remove it, or make it configurable.

specifying