oneline | : one : A personal assistant chatbot built with Ruby | Chat library

Trying to run a very simple local python webserver to serve a directory with some images in different formats like png, jpg and webp.

im developing a private c++ tool for month now. And now everything seems to be lost because i wanted to use Github. I really hope that i can restore it with someones help.

What i did:

a few weeks ago i played around with github in Visual studio. I was able to commit a lot of files to my private Github. I dont know how Github works in detail so please be patient.

After that i just did not use it anymore as i just wanted to know how it might work for a later step.

I started recoding a lot of stuff and changing almost everything on my tool. Today i wanted to commit those new coded project to the github repository.

I thought about deleting the current github content bforehand and did it so .. so i went on github.com and just deteled my "test commit" from weeks ago.

After that i went back to Visual studio and tryed to commit my new project. That it started to pull and push or something and after that everything what was "new" has been deleted.

Please tell me, am i able to restore my project in any way ? I really start to cry if all my work is lost.

Thank you

EDIT:

D:\ME\Documents\Visual Studio 2019\repos>git log --oneline

I would like to initialize an array filled with 0, and a 1 in a specific location. I know how to do it with two lines of code like this:

Hope you can help me with my question. Actually I know there are solutions (e.G. nullchecking), but I am searching for a super-elegant solution! In the best case a oneliner. Hopefully, you can help me.

I will describe now the problem by using simple examples.

I have a Java object, that contains other Java objects (nested Java object) next to other simple member variables.

Class Store:

• String Name
• String City
• Employee Employee

Class Employee:

• String Name
• Integer Age
• BankAccount BankAccount

... and so on.

You can see that the Store object -> contains: Employee object -> contains: a BankAccount object.

To call the age of the Employee from the Store object, I would have do do:

I am working on a git repository. I have a blobID, that I know is from this repository. I want to list all commits in which this blobId is involved.

Looking at some existing StackOverflow questions, I came up with the following command :

From recent work in devops, it seems as though there are "two ways" to check out a branch in git: using the plain branch name, e.g. dev, or using the branch name prefixed with refs/heads/, e.g. refs/heads/dev.

What is the difference between the two?

Certain HTTP POST content in the Bitbucket webhook to Jenkins gives the "refs/head" version of the branch. Other POST content gives the "basename" branch.
E.g. using (what I think is) Jenkins syntax to fetch POST content from a pull-request Bitbucket event, $.pullRequest.fromRef.id == /refs/heads/dev...
and $.pullRequest.fromRef.displayId == dev

In a cloned repository, checking out refs/heads/dev and dev resolves to the same SHAID, but their respective stdouts differ:

Let's say I have a git repo with various branches. If I do

Is there a way to get clang-format to put oneline namespaces on one line like below? I need to do some forward declarations and I prefere to put it like this.

I was working on a branch, and realized that I wanted changes from a different branch to help with my testing, but I didn't want to actually commit them to my current branch. So I used git merge --no-commit to bring those changes into my current branch. Then I unstaged the changed files with git reset and proceeded with my work and testing. Eventually I committed some changes related to my current work (but not the changes related to the other branch that I had brought in and unstaged).

I was confused to find that the commit history for my current branch now shows a commit from the "other branch" even though I never committed those changes here. I don't seem to actually have the changes, but looking through the log is confusing because it appears the changes were applied (and never removed) but they aren't here. So I think I got what I want in the end, but with a confusing history.

I realize now that what I did was presumably not a good way to accomplish my goals, but can anyone help me understand how the history works? I suppose there's some chance that I am misremembering exactly what I did too...

EDIT: Here's the most recent part of my git log graph. The part I don't understand now is why the actual changes from commit 34eaa54 do not appear at the head of my journal branch.