file-server | Simple http file server that supports files and directories | File Utils library

Hi Dockerized a reactjs and expressjs project, everything is worked good when i have written separate docker compose file.

But now i written one compose file

docker-compose-all-dev.yml file

I'm trying to build a gRPC PHP Client and gRPC NodeJs Server in docker. But the problem is I can't install protoc-gen-php-grpc to my docker server. When I try to run this run this makefile:

I have read some posts but I have not been able to get what I want. I have a dataframe with ~4k rows and a few columns which I exported from Infoblox (DNS server). One of them is dhcp attributes and I would like to expand it to have separated values. This is my df (I attach a screenshot from excel): excel screenshot

One of the columns is a dictionary from all the options, this is an example(sanitized):

I'm trying to debug my typescript NodeJs application in VS Code with the following launch.json:

I have a logback config that logs to multiple files including the primary log file called servernexus.log. Each log file is suppose to be rotated by RollingFileAppender. When I run from eclipse with the logback config file and everything else in my $CLASSPATH the servernexus.log is rotated properly by logback. When I run from my production WAR file logging works but the servernexus.log rotation never happens.

Here's the logback-server-win32event.xml:

I have installed a NodeJS module on a Digital Ocean Droplet. It generates a csv file that I store in the directory root/csv_file/my_file.csv.

However, I cannot access it in the browser by simply visiting ip_address/csv_file/my_file.csv.

I read this question which asks me to install http-server so I installed it. After that I ran the following command:

I have created a NavigationBar component using react-bootstrap, so that I can use that over and over in my project.

NavigationBar:

Some background: We currently receive files from multiple data-vendors on a FTP server hosted by our hosting partner. As part of a new project we are setting up an Azure Function. This function runs in a ressource-group that our hosting partner has set up for VPN/private network access. This function is the first step in a process of replacing multiple legacy programs in Excel/VBA with Azure functions.

What we need is to move files from the FTP server to another internal (file-)server (to support some of the legacy programs). The FTP server is in DMZ and therefore not part of the domain like the file-server.

Now I have googled around for hours finding a solution and believe I have found it using https://stackoverflow.com/a/295703/998791 and https://stackoverflow.com/a/1197430/998791

i have a handful of dockerized microservices, each is listening for http requests on a certain port, and i have these deployments formalized as kubernetes yaml files

however, i can't figure out a working strategy to expose my deployments on the interwebs (in terms of kubernetes services)

each deployment has multiple replicas, and so i assume each deployment should have a matching load balancer service to expose it to the outside

now i can't figure out a strategy to sanely expose these microservices to the internet... here's what i'm thinking:

1. the whole cluster is exposed on a domain name, and services are subdomains

   • say the cluster is available at k8s.mydomain.com
   • each loadbalancer service (which exposes a corresponding microservice) should be accessible by a subdomain
     • auth-server.k8s.mydomain.com
     • profile-server.k8s.mydomain.com
     • questions-board.k8s.mydomain.com
     • so requests to each subdomain would be load balanced to the replicas of the matching deployment
   • so how do i actually achieve this setup? is this desirable?
     • can i expose each load balancer as a subdomain? is this done automatically?
     • or do i need an ingress controller?
     • am i barking up the wrong tree?
     • i'm looking for general advice on how to expose a single app which is a mosaic of microservices

2. each service is exposed on the same ip/domain, but each gets its own port

   • perhaps the whole cluster is accessible at k8s.mydomain.com again
   • can i map each port to a different load balancer?
     • k8s.mydomain.com:8000 maps to auth-server-loadbalancer
     • k8s.mydomain.com:8001 maps to profile-server-loadbalancer
   • is this possible? it seems less robust and less desirable than strategy 1 above

3. each service is exposed on its own ip/domain?

   • perhaps each service specifies a static ip, and my domain has A records pointing each subdomain at each of these ip's in a manual way?
   • how do i know which static ip's to use? in production? in local dev?

maybe i'm conceptualizing this wrong? can a whole kubernetes cluster map to one ip/domain?

what's the simplest way to expose a bunch of microservies in kubernetes? on the other hand, what's the most robust/ideal way to expose microservices in production? do i need a different strategy for local development in minikube? (i was just going to edit /etc/hosts a lot)

thanks for any advice, cheers