headroom.js | Give your pages some headroom Hide your header until you need it | Frontend Framework library
kandi X-RAY | headroom.js Summary
kandi X-RAY | headroom.js Summary
Headroom.js is a lightweight, high-performance JS widget (with no dependencies) that allows you to react to the user's scroll. The header on this site is a living example, it slides out of view when scrolling down and slides back in when scrolling up.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of headroom.js
headroom.js Key Features
headroom.js Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on headroom.js
QUESTION
I am using Headroom.js in my bootstrap website, and so far so good, working fine the way i want. I have a question though: Is there anyway to change navbrand and customize navlinks when in "notTop"?! Let me be clearer, When fixed, i use a transparent navbar with a white version of the logo and white navlinks, BUT, when scrolled down, i need the navbar white transparent, navlinks darker/black and a black version of my logo. Most likely it can be done but i havent been able to find a solution for this. Thanks in advance.
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Apr-12 at 23:31Here is how you can achieve the desired effect. Simply apply styles based on top
and notTop
scenario. Run the working stack snippet below to see it in action.
QUESTION
This is my first time dealing with Gatsby and React, so I might be using the wrong approach on this matter. Anyway, this is what is going on.
From the gatsby-starter-hello-world, I'm building this site that will be composed of a front page with a Hero on the top, holding the intro information. Right bellow, I'm intending to insert some content (I'm not sure about what yet), with this
Anyway, right now, this is what I have for a Layout.js
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jan-13 at 21:55Your Hero
component would need to use forwardRef
to pass the ref
to the nearest React element:
QUESTION
How to hide navigation menu bar
on scroll down
and it should appear on scrolling up
using angularjs
?
As I have seen a solution that library 'headroom.js' is quite useful but I am unable to implement.Please suggest an appropriate solution.
ANSWER
Answered 2017-Mar-23 at 15:16Thanks to this post: scroll up/down detection
You can use this:
QUESTION
I use headroom.js to hide/show navbar on scroll. Works great. On scrolling up, nav has a solid background colour and when nav is at top, background should be transparent. No issues on Chrome but an issue with Safari.
Markup:
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Oct-06 at 12:44Well for starters you have
QUESTION
I want to show a sticky menu nav when scrolling up while also having a delay before showing the nav menu. I can do this with animate and opacity, but it's not as effective.
I tried to show the nav menu when scrolling up 50px from the current position, but it didn't work.
Here's the script:
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Sep-07 at 17:59Your current setup only accounts for scrolls that are greater than headerOrgOffset
. If you want the slide down to happen, you need to account for cases where the scroll is less than headerOrgOffset
. Since you also want a 50px buffer, I've added a -50 in the else statement.
QUESTION
I have #event
div an it's a hidden div on my page When I scroll down my page if I near to my #event
div then be visible.but when I scroll down to near my #event
div then it becomes visible but there is a little bug because when I scroll down my div is shaking.
so where is my mistake ?
I see a plugin headroom.js
but I don't want to use any plugin I want to do by myself.I guess it is a basic.
footnote: my #event
div is in center of the #page
div with red background
ANSWER
Answered 2017-Jun-23 at 13:17This would solve your issue:
QUESTION
I would like to improve an existing code that allows me to show the navbar once the page is loaded and after the user scrolls down it disappears. I want to make the navbar appear every time the user scrolls up. Basically, I need a Headroom plugin, but as a pure javascript. I would consider any other simple alternatives.
That's is some HTML and the Javascript itself:
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Jun-22 at 17:12If creating HTML is allowed, one can add the CSS styles required for Headroom through Javascript.
Note: This only creates the CSS for Headroom; Headroom itself still must be loaded
Examples using CSS on headroom.js examples
Pure JS:
QUESTION
I'm using the awesome Headroom.js plugin to build an auto-hiding header. The header is static from start and becomes pinned after an offset (when scrolling down) and then back to static (when it's back to the top).
Here is what I have done: http://codepen.io/netgloo/pen/KmGpBL
but I got 2 problems:
- scrolling down from top: when the header becomes pinned, I see it slides down and suddenly slides up
- scrolling up from middle page: when the header arrives to the offset it disappears, but I need keeping it pinned to the top
Someone could give me some help or ideas? Thanks
Here is how I initialize the plugin:
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Jun-10 at 14:14The headroom.js
script mainly handles the addition/removal of some classes for you. It's up to you to add the appropriate styles to achieve the effect you want. Let's start with the simplest part, the HTML:
HTML
QUESTION
Introductory information: I've made a fixed menu button to show the navigation menu when using a mobile device. For this application I'm using the Headroom.js script to make the button smaller when scrolling downwards to ensure that it doesn't block too much of the content. The animation/transition is applied by adding a class with the given changes.
In the original method i changed the size and look of the button by changing height/width
of the parent element and padding
of the child element with CSS (and css transition).
The new method, which I've read could/should be better according to various sites, is changing the size of the button by using transform: scale()
. Note that i'm also moving the element a bit by also applying translate3d(20px,20px,0)
in this method. However, it feels a bit smoother when scrolling using the transform: scale()
method (could be a placebo effect though), but using chrome dev tools' timeline gives me seemingly inconclusive results.
Therefore a part of my question is also how I should evaluate the best method. Is timeline in Chrome Dev tools the best option, or is there a better way to do it? And which elements of the timeline should I base my choices on? and the other thing is, based on your interpretation of the images and/or tests combined with your knowledge, which method performs the best (or should perform the best in theory)?
Beneath you can see two examples of the timeline with each method.
Changing height/width and padding (original method):
Method using transform: scale()
to change the size:
Also you can try the different methods in fiddles here:
link: Original method changing height/width and padding
link to new method: using transform:scale
Please ignore the poor layout of everything; especially the button. The ugly image inside the menu button is just to show, that there's an image included in the layout on my own page and to take that into performance considerations. The images in the back is also included since it's a webshop with a lot of images which could influence performance.
CSS for added class that makes the changes in the original method:
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Mar-14 at 21:40I believe you are missing the point, Chris: the reason why no other property but transform
and opacity
should ever be animated is because they don't trigger a repaint in anything else, even if the element is in the document flow (and because you can basically do anything with these two alone in like 95% of the cases).
From the "hit-on-performance" point of view, there are two types of animations:
- those that trigger a repaint in other elements than the animated element
- those that do not.
That's the main reason behind recommending animations by transform
, opacity
or position:relative;left|right|top|left
. Because they don't actually move the element in flow, thus not triggering a repaint to every single other element in flow after the one being animated.
Now, if the said parent was positioned absolute (which I assume to be the case), it wouldn't have triggered a repaint to the rest of DOM
anyway so the differences between that method and transform
would have been minor. Inconclusive, as you put it. In theory, repainting two elements instead of one should be slower.
If you need to test, make 10k clones and trigger animation on all of them, with each method.
That will be conclusive.
If you really want to min-max
this (as in spend absurd amounts of time on hardly noticeable improvements, as I do) you will find plenty of resources that will recommend:
- replacing any
.animate()
with.velocity()
- never animating anything but
transform
oropacity
, although Velocity claims they animate anything without a hit on performance (i find that debatable/arguable, at best) - but it's a net improvement over.animate()
- sticking to
CSS
transitions, if possible (basically if you don't need chains) - using Web Animations API
Personal advice: never count on synced CSS
animations, especially when you have many of them. If you change tabs or the system does something extremely resource heavy for a while, your animations will be way off. If you need chains, chain.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install headroom.js
After installing headroom.js. The following JS will create and initialise a headroom instance:.
The following steps will get you setup to contribute changes to this repo:.
Fork the repo (click the Fork button at the top right of this page)
Clone your fork locally
Install dependencies. This repo uses npm, so you should too.
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page