ember-collection | efficient incremental rendering component for Ember.js | Grid library

by adopted-ember-addons JavaScript Version: 3.0.0 License: MIT

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(2)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | ember-collection Summary

ember-collection is a JavaScript library typically used in User Interface, Grid, Jekyll applications. ember-collection has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. You can install using 'npm i ember-collection' or download it from GitHub, npm.

An efficient incremental rendering component with support for custom layouts and large lists.

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

ember-collection has a low active ecosystem.

It has 232 star(s) with 82 fork(s). There are 30 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 12 months.

There are 38 open issues and 39 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 79 days. There are 17 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of ember-collection is 3.0.0

Quality

ember-collection has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

Security

ember-collection has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

ember-collection code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.

There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

License

ember-collection is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.

Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

Reuse

ember-collection releases are available to install and integrate.

Deployable package is available in npm.

Installation instructions, examples and code snippets are available.

ember-collection saves you 92 person hours of effort in developing the same functionality from scratch.

It has 236 lines of code, 0 functions and 61 files.

It has low code complexity. Code complexity directly impacts maintainability of the code.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of ember-collection

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

ember-collection Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for ember-collection.

ember-collection Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for ember-collection.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on ember-collection

Excel Question: Cell A2=F2 , A8=F3 how can I achieve this?

Is an IEnumerable now more water tight than an IReadOnlyList?

QUESTION

Excel Question: Cell A2=F2 , A8=F3 how can I achieve this?

Asked 2019-May-04 at 14:17

I am trying to fill the column C = F data as long as the A counter is not restarting. I tried many things but it automatically update the and the F counter +1 in the subsequent cells.

I tried this =IF(A2<>-1;F2;F2+1) but it keeps incrementing F cells I dont want it to increment the F cell just the A but I dont know how to achieve this

...

ANSWER

Answered 2019-May-04 at 12:44

I'm not sure I understood your question correctly, but you can lock a cell-reference by using the dollar symbol. E.g.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/55982509

QUESTION

Is an IEnumerable now more water tight than an IReadOnlyList?

Asked 2018-Apr-16 at 13:47

I have read this question: IEnumerable vs IReadonlyCollection vs ReadonlyCollection for exposing a list member and this question: ReadOnlyCollection or IEnumerable for exposing member collections?. I am concious that these answers were written years ago.

The answer by Jon Skeet suggests that I should be using a IReadOnlyCollection rather than an IEnumerable as I am very cautious to prevent code like this:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2018-Apr-16 at 12:35

Is this more water tight than an IReadOnlyCollection?

I don't think so. I would say they serve the same purpose in another way.

Are there any risks using this code? Is it less efficient?

Risks? Not that I am aware of. Since the yield return compiles to an internal state machine, you lose the direct exposure of the list. That is a benefit of your approach, just like with a read-only collection.

Your code does have a performance impact though: getting the count and other relevant properties have a complexity of O(n) instead of O(1). This might hurt your performance.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/49857408

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network