jsx-transform | A standard and configurable implementation | Parser library

 by   alexmingoia JavaScript Version: 2.4.1 License: No License

kandi X-RAY | jsx-transform Summary

kandi X-RAY | jsx-transform Summary

jsx-transform is a JavaScript library typically used in Utilities, Parser, React applications. jsx-transform has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities and it has low support. You can install using 'npm i jsx-transform' or download it from GitHub, npm.

JSX transpiler. A standard and configurable implementation of JSX decoupled from React.
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              jsx-transform has a low active ecosystem.
              It has 264 star(s) with 27 fork(s). There are 10 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 12 months.
              There are 9 open issues and 14 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 64 days. There are no pull requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of jsx-transform is 2.4.1

            kandi-Quality Quality

              jsx-transform has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

            kandi-Security Security

              jsx-transform has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.
              jsx-transform code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.
              There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

            kandi-License License

              jsx-transform does not have a standard license declared.
              Check the repository for any license declaration and review the terms closely.
              OutlinedDot
              Without a license, all rights are reserved, and you cannot use the library in your applications.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              jsx-transform releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.
              Deployable package is available in npm.
              Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
            Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of jsx-transform
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            jsx-transform Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for jsx-transform.

            jsx-transform Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for jsx-transform.

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            What can't I export JSX from a NPM Package
            Asked 2021-Apr-26 at 16:09

            I'm writing a library that exposes some React Components as part of its API.

            I'm going to make a few assumptions here :

            1 - It is going to be used inside react projects.

            2 - Those projects will bundle their dependencies at some point.

            3 - Those react projects can use JSX as a way of describing the UI.

            4 - Their bundler of choice, Webpack if it's a create-react-app, will use babel in order to parse and transpile that JSX into vanilla JS.

            Following that logic, I should be able export some JSX from an external package, because the package's code will be bundled, transpiled alongside the app.

            However, when I do so in a create-react-app project, I get the following error :

            SyntaxError: /Users/someone/Desktop/someproject/dist/esm/index.js: Support for the experimental syntax 'jsx' isn't currently enabled (35:13):

            Add @babel/preset-react (https://git.io/JfeDR) to the 'presets' section of your Babel config to enable transformation. If you want to leave it as-is, add @babel/plugin-syntax-jsx (https://git.io/vb4yA) to the 'plugins' section to enable parsing.

            Yes, I could transpile the JSX, maybe I will. I just don't see any reason to, if it's going to be bundled anyway. I prefer leaving transpiling tweaking and optimisation to the user.

            My concern is that if I transpile it myself, I have 2 choices.

            import React in scope, and using babel to turn into React.createElement(), but this will rule out the possibility to use the new JSX transform

            use the new JSX transform myself, and figure out whether or not my code will be compatible with react versions prior to 17. And increase my own bundle size because there is a lot of code added by babel to make that work.

            At this point, I think I'm quite excited about this issue because frankly I have no idea why I can't just export plain JSX from my package. I know I'm probably missing something obvious, like a semi-colon or whatever, but I really want to understand.

            If you want some code / rollup - babel configs feel free to ask.

            Tanks !

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Apr-26 at 16:09

            Your logic seems to make sense at first glance. But let's examine why this is a bad idea.

            JSX is a special syntax that must be transpiled down to the lowest common demoninator to be understood in the browser, or by Nodejs. This is what bundlers do, and as you mentioned, anyone working with react in a node environment is almost certainly using a bundler to do this.

            However, there are any number of wierd syntaxes that people may use in their code. When a bundler imports code from a node_module, if the code in those modules is not already transpiled, the bundler would need to transpile them as well. Considering un-transpiled modules may be in any number of strange syntaxes, each module would need its own transpilation instructions (think babel configuration). Having unique transpilation configurations for every node_module would be very unwieldy, not to mention having to transpile each node_module, potentially in a different way, would be bad for performance.

            The generally accepted best practice for solve this problem is to simply build your package using a bunder which boils the code down to the lowest common denominator. This enables your package-user's bundler to just bring in the code in a node_module "as is".

            While its probably possible to come up with some crazy babe/webpack/rollup instructions to custom-interperet your module as JSX, do you really want your library users to have to do that? Especially in the case of people using create-react-app, customizing the babel config of CRA is not natively supported, which means they will need to take extra-steps to get your library to work. Additionally, webpack defaults to excluding node_modules from js transpilations for obvious performance reasons, and CRA follows this convention. When publishing libraries, you want them to be universally useable as easy as possible to consume.

            Transpiling, tweaking, and optimizing code is best left to the person who wrote it, which in the case of a react component library you're trying to publish, is you.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67269370

            QUESTION

            How to convert a string into JSX in React 17
            Asked 2021-Feb-15 at 17:38

            Given some string:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Feb-15 at 17:38

            In fact yes you can using JSX syntax similar to React.createElement

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66212401

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install jsx-transform

            You can install using 'npm i jsx-transform' or download it from GitHub, npm.

            Support

            For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
            Install
          • npm

            npm i jsx-transform

          • CLONE
          • HTTPS

            https://github.com/alexmingoia/jsx-transform.git

          • CLI

            gh repo clone alexmingoia/jsx-transform

          • sshUrl

            git@github.com:alexmingoia/jsx-transform.git

          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link

            Explore Related Topics

            Consider Popular Parser Libraries

            marked

            by markedjs

            swc

            by swc-project

            es6tutorial

            by ruanyf

            PHP-Parser

            by nikic

            Try Top Libraries by alexmingoia

            sticky

            by alexmingoiaJavaScript

            koa-resource-router

            by alexmingoiaJavaScript

            pux-devtool

            by alexmingoiaJavaScript

            gulp-file

            by alexmingoiaJavaScript

            mongoose-populate-virtuals

            by alexmingoiaJavaScript