github-actions | For internal reference | Frontend Framework library
kandi X-RAY | github-actions Summary
kandi X-RAY | github-actions Summary
This respository contains a library of GitHub Actions to help you integrate your test suite with the BrowserStack device cloud. You need a BrowserStack username and access-key to run your tests on the BrowserStack device cloud. You can sign-up for free trial if you do not have an existing account. If you want to test your open source project on BrowserStack, then sign-up here for lifetime free access to all our products.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Fetches a remote resource
- Consumes a Body .
- Create a wrapper around the appropriate requests .
- Generate v1 node from vseq .
- Parse request body
- Executes the executable path of the given file path .
- Get the list of the uploaded files .
- Search for toolpath
- Get node request options .
- Gets all values from given context
github-actions Key Features
github-actions Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on github-actions
QUESTION
I have run many times github actions on my repo without problem and with the same script on one of my repo it is displaying “no status”. The repo is: https://github.com/aurelpere/python-planif I dont understand why it is not displaying a status as the workflow runs correctly… Any help would be great thank you
notice my svg badge also shows "no status" at https://github.com/aurelpere/python-planif/workflows/CI/badge.svg and at https://github.com/aurelpere/python-planif/workflows/Unittests/badge.svg . (following what is in this post : https://github.community/t/badge-shows-no-status-and-no-status-mismatch-between-the-filepath-vs-name-usage/16907 or in this post Github Actions badge shows "No status")
I also tried to duplicate the code in another fresh repo (https://github.com/aurelpere/python-geothermal---power-to-gas/ ) and it is the same, the badge shows no status, so it has nothing to do with the fast forward merge issue from here https://github.community/t/workflow-badge-no-status/17280/2
Edit : solved with the answer below, but i deleted the initial repo and kept only the fresh one if you try to follow the links
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Apr-17 at 11:25For some reason you have to use the workflow name instead of the yaml file name. This worked for me
QUESTION
I am new to GitHub Actions and want to build and deploy my Android app to "internal testing" at the Google Play store. I have seen some good articles on it, but have been running into the 'set-env' error. I have followed the link but still do not understand how to apply it to my specific use case.
The
set-env
command is disabled. Please upgrade to using Environment Files or opt into unsecure command execution by setting theACTIONS_ALLOW_UNSECURE_COMMANDS
environment variable totrue
. For more information see: https://github.blog/changelog/2020-10-01-github-actions-deprecating-set-env-and-add-path-commands/
There seems to be some good examples without the environment files, which seems like the right way to go. I am following this, this, and this. All have some simple steps, but this is where I am having the problem:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Apr-15 at 14:43use an updated version of the actions/setup-java step, like:
QUESTION
I have 2 repos: user/ext-private and user/ext-public. I want to push some files to public repo but its failing with following error:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-15 at 17:30The problem is that you're using the GITHUB_TOKEN (which has a specific permission scope) instead of a PAT (Personal Access Token).
You can't push to another repo using the GITHUB_TOKEN, you'll need a PAT to do so.
There are also many actions from the marketplace to perform the push operation for you, after adding the PAT as a secret.
QUESTION
This question is similar to How to run a github-actions step, even if the previous step fails, while still failing the job but the accepted answer does not help me because the it creates an additional job.
What i am trying to accomplish below is
- When the test-app (step2) passes; the test-clean step should run and the github action workflow returns success.
- When the test-app (step2) fails; the test-clean, action-slack and fail-action steps should run. The github action workflow returns fails.
How do I fix the below code to make it happen?
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-11 at 07:02You can use the status check functions to know the status of previous steps. If you don't include such a function, if: success() && ...
is implied. This means that a job will not run when previous jobs failed unless you use always()
or failure()
in the if
clause.
To address the result of previous steps, you can use the steps context
like steps..outcome
(before continue-on-error
is applied) or steps..conclusion
(after continue-on-error
is applied).
Here is a working example combining everything:
QUESTION
Per the documentation found here, I have tried setting a GitHub Action environment variable but noticed that the env variables don't seem to save. Has this been deprecated or is the documentation / my implementation just incorrect?
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-03 at 08:29This behaviour is expected since "the step that creates or updates the environment variable does not have access to the new value, but all subsequent steps in a job will have access." (documentation)
To illustrate, consider the following definition of steps:
QUESTION
Github Actions were working in my repository till yesterday. I didnt make any changes in .github/workflows/dev.yml file or in DockerFile.
But, suddenly in recent pushes, my Github Actions fail with the error
Setup, Build, Publish, and Deploy
...
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jul-27 at 13:24I fixed it by changing uses
value to
uses: google-github-actions/setup-gcloud@master
QUESTION
I would like to limit concurrency to one run for my workflow:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-06 at 21:23I am using this concurrency key for my workflows in similar case:
QUESTION
You see a lot of articles on combining GitHub actions with Terraform. It makes sense that anytime one wants to provision something different in their infrastructure that a CI/CD pipeline would add visibility and repeatability to an otherwise manual process.
But some article make it sound as though Terraform is doing the deploying of any change. For example, this article says "anytime there is a push to the src directory it will kick off the action which will have Terraform deploy the changes made to your website."
But doesn't this only make sense if the change you are making is related to provisioning infrastructure? Why would you want any code push to trigger a Terraform job if most pushes to the codecase have nothing to do with provisioning new infrastrucutre? Aren't most code pushes things like changing some CSS on the website, or adding a function to a back-end node script. These don't require provisioning new infrastructure, as the code is just placed onto existing infrastructure.
Or perhaps the article is suggesting the repo is dedicated only to Terraform.
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-15 at 09:04In my case the changes are from terraform(only) repos. Any change to infra would be triggered by these repos. In rest of the actual app code, it would always be Ansible-Jenkins. Deploying terraform infrastructure change everytime there is a push to app-code might bring down the uptime of the application. In case of containerized application it would be Helm-kubernetes doing the application bit.
QUESTION
I built a pylint git action, for pull request, which actually works really well:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-12 at 12:39Yes it's doable.
I am using combination of 2 actions:
- one to find comment id
- second one to update or create comment
Here you have a working example coming from an action I use for comments editing and creation: https://github.com/peter-evans/create-or-update-comment#where-to-find-the-id-of-a-comment
QUESTION
I'm trying to publish a npm package on GAR (Google Artifact Registry) through github using google-github-actions/auth@v0
and google-artifactregistry-auth
For the authentication to google from github here is what I did to use the Federation Workload Identity:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-11 at 12:44I finally find out !!! BUT I'm not sure in term of security if there is any risk or not so if anyone can advice I'll edit the answer !
What is changing but I'm not sure in term of security is here :
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install github-actions
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page