offliner | bringing offline web applications through service workers | Frontend Framework library
kandi X-RAY | offliner Summary
kandi X-RAY | offliner Summary
Offliner is a library that implements a lifecycle for web applications utilizing service workers. The primary goal of offliner is to enable developers to provide an offline experience for their applications and easily dispatch updates to users as needed.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of offliner
offliner Key Features
offliner Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on offliner
QUESTION
I'm trying to validate an X509 certificate chain without importing the root CA certificate into the trusted root CA certificate store (in production this code will run in an Azure Function, and you can't add certificates to the trusted root CA certificate store on Azure App Services).
We also need to perform an online CRL check on this certificate chain.
I've searched on this and I see many others are facing the same problem, but none of the suggestions seem to work. I've followed the approach outlined in this SO post, which echoes the suggestions from issue #26449 on the dotnet/runtime GitHub. Here's a small console application (targetting .NET Core 3.1) reproducing the problem:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-14 at 11:59Well, not a full answer, but probably it will get you going.
We've built before an Azure Web App (not a function app, but I guess wouldn't matter) which did exactly what you want. Took us a week or so. Full answer would be posting the code of the whole app, we I obviously cannot do. Some hints though.
We walked around the certificate problem by uploading certificates to the app (TLS settings) and accessing them in code through WEBSITE_LOAD_CERTIFICATES setting (you put thumbprints there, it's also mentioned in the link you posted), than you can get them in code and build your own certificate store:
QUESTION
I am new on automation selenium using javascript, I have simple code like below that I am using faker data to generate random email, question is incase I have data table on scenario outline 2 types, when I run the code some how the data for email for second loop is using same data that generated on first loop, question is how to get different data for 2nd loop?
#feature file
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-15 at 13:03solved by add function for this data file :
QUESTION
I am trying to get mutual client certification to work in Azure. I am running a web app with this configuration:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jul-11 at 11:12Exactly same question I asked here https://community.cloudflare.com/t/manual-authenticated-origin-pulls-verification/145614. Dunno why, but A27996CBA564D24731BC76439C48920C1F7D4AA3 it's correct.
EDIT: Update with chain
QUESTION
Good afternoon,
We're working with an opensource CMS. Last version we upgraded, it comes with a new feature which is a javascript serviceworker implementation to handle all the requests made.
This CMS have some workflow forms where users interact (designed by us). On design time, you can add some custom html on them as an special snippet elements, which can hold all the JS, HTML and CSS code you desire.
We created a button which on click, made a $.get() to a Python Flask server we have online/active on the same machine-instance (https://localhost:5000/).
With previous CMS version before upgrade (no serviceworker was present on it), if we stopped the Flask server, on a button click $.get() we received an error as expected (404/500), so we could handle it with ".fail()" jQuery part. But if Flask was active, we handle it on ".done()" part.
Now, it happens that EVERYTHING falls on ".done()", because even when it should fail (because Flask is offline), serviceworker "middle-catches" it and resolves with an OK (200):
When in reality server is down:
So, how can we avoid serviceworker to catch the ajax call, knowing that we cannot alter the serviceworker code in any way? Can we extend it somehow, to add on the "fetch" listener a validation against "/api" url to just "return;"?
This is the catching point as Chrome says to:
And piece of function code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jun-30 at 11:52Well, no answers. Ok.
So if anyone is interested I explain how I've solved it. Basically, with a "rodeo":
- There is no way to alter the serviceworker functionality (as it is a 3rd party SW, which I cannot edit).
- So the only way is to "avoid cache" everytime, with "cache: false" on every ajax call.
- This way SW cannot serve an "offline" version of the page, and I do not receive the real page (cached, but real) everytime even if online.
- So instead on recalling to .done() and .fail(), everything goes to "done()" (as all is 200 OK), but I check response content in there, like in the old days... This way if server is online, it resolves a real 200 OK with the correct expected response. But if it is offline, as I use the "cache: false" parametter, even with the SW OK 200, the response doesn't comes with the real expectes response text. So conditional fails and I can consider it as a real 404.
Simple, but that's it.
QUESTION
I have a root certificate and a leaf. The leaf has a CRL URL OID extension which points to a valid online location. Doing this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Apr-08 at 20:48I've read your code from PC and figured what's up: your root certificate is not trusted on your system. Windows CryptoAPI throws CERT_E_UNTRUSTEDROOT
when root certificate is not trusted. Along with this, CryptoAPI terminates revocation checking and throw two addition errors: CRYPT_E_NO_REVOCATION_CHECK
and CERT_E_UNTRUSTEDROOT
, because revocation checking was skipped. In addition with untrusted root, CryptoAPI skips other checks (such as constraints, for example), but do not report them. Everything is correct and as expected.
You are trying to allow untrusted root, but do it incorrectly, because this way you skip other checks (as mentioned in previous paragraph) and your logic is vulnerable.
You can exclude untrusted root exception in chain settings and force CryptoAPI to continue validation and return success if no other errors found, but I strongly recommend to not do that, because then you are open to any kind of MITM.
You have two options:
- make root certificate trusted by a machine (local system). This may not be possible.
- call
CertCreateCertificateChainEngine
function directly and put your root certificate inhRestrictedTrust
member ofCERT_CHAIN_ENGINE_CONFIG
structure.
If you are on Windows, 2nd approach is the most secure and reliable. As of now, .NET's X509Chain
doesn't implement this functionality. It requires extra coding, but there are no much alternatives.
QUESTION
I have a question about caching in PWA.
I would like to let user choose a list to cache. For example:
User creating few lists, and then he choose one, to save for offline.
When he is offline he can only open 2 views:
1. smth like "u are offline, do you want to open saved list?" (if it exist)
2. View with saved list.
At this moment, I am caching all views that user visited, but can't cache views with dynamic data.
I'm using PWA.essentials to do PWA.
ANSWER
Answered 2019-Dec-29 at 15:14You are saving the user selected pages’ list at server side in offline.json and you are caching that file too. As per working of PWA cached resources are served from cache and not from server until cache is removed/cleared.
You can take 2 approach.
Whenever user adds to the offline.json you need enforce service worker to update the offline file.
You can simply store the user selecting in local storage and from there you add pages to cache list.
QUESTION
I've been trying to install the Microsoft Visual Studio 2017 Installer Projects for VS 2017 Professional for some time now without success. First, I tried through the Extensions and Updates wizard within VS2017. It downloads correctly, but when I close VS to kick off the install if fails immediately with the following:
I then grabbed the VSIX from the Visual Studio Marketplace and tried to install it via the following command line:
VSIXInstaller InstallerProjects.vsix
This seemed to get me further, but also clued me into the certificates being the issue. Not how it says Digital Signature: Invalid Certificate
:
After clicking through to continue the install, it fails and allows me to see the logs:
The logs seem to echo the certificate issue here:
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-Oct-30 at 13:32In windows 10 I believe there is app settings that dictate whether or not you can install apps that are signed by an unknown signature, etc. Have you checked to make sure that these aren't locked down to only allow installs from the Microsoft App Store?
I think this applies:
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee619754%28v=ws.10%29.aspx
I have also seen issues where I have old certificate chains stuck on a specific AD user and was able to resolve them by clearing some of the certs and trying again.
I would also try installing it with any antivirus disabled etc.
This thread seems relevant, I would not use the first suggestion of disabling CRLF revcheck without trying some of the later comments first.
QUESTION
I have found this extension to use Codable to be saved into NSUserDefaults
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Jul-30 at 11:55You are getting error because of [String:Any]
I suggest you to convert [String:Any]
to Data
Using JSONSerialization.data
And Then you can use like this
QUESTION
I have a requirement wherein I have to send saved API requests on a button click. These API requests are added to a list and this list is saved to SharedPreferences
if the device is offline. Once the device regains connectivity, the saved requests should be sent on a click of a button. If one of the requests get a HTTP status code of 401, the whole process should stop. However, in case of other Exceptions, the process should not interrupted and the next saved request on the list should be sent. If a request succeeds, it is removed from the list of saved requests. At the end of the process, any requests that remain unsent are saved to SharedPreferences.
Now I have a special case for an Exception that I call InvalidRequestException
. I want to remove the request from the list when it encounters this particular error, and at the same time I want to carry on sending the remaining requests in the list.
I modeled my code from this post. Here is the code for the method that kicks off the whole process:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Jul-29 at 07:54As I noted in my edit, I wasn't able to catch the ConcurrentModificationException
, thus the entire stream was interrupted. I was in fact, modifying the List
that is being emitted into individual Observable
, since requestList
is only a shallow copy of the List
emitted by getSavedOfflineRequest
.
One solution I tried was to first serialize the list via Moshi, so that the unserialzied list will not hold any reference to the original list. I found out soon enough that requestList.remove(request)
will return false, since I had yet to properly override the equals()
and hashCode()
method for the Request
class. In the end, I just settled to create a "failed requests" list, adding Requests
to this list whenever an error is encountered.
QUESTION
Take a look at this implementation:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-May-28 at 01:24Log
is defined by construct_runtime
macro.
Here are some relevant code:
construct_runtime
macro:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install offliner
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page