bikeshed | Promise Less or Do | Reactive Programming library

by emulbreh JavaScript Version: Current License: Non-SPDX

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(4)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | bikeshed Summary

bikeshed is a JavaScript library typically used in Programming Style, Reactive Programming applications. bikeshed has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities and it has low support. However bikeshed has a Non-SPDX License. You can download it from GitHub.

Promise Less or Do More

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

bikeshed has a low active ecosystem.

It has 6 star(s) with 2 fork(s). There are 4 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 6 months.

There are 0 open issues and 1 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 2031 days. There are no pull requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of bikeshed is current.

Quality

bikeshed has no bugs reported.

Security

bikeshed has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

License

bikeshed has a Non-SPDX License.

Non-SPDX licenses can be open source with a non SPDX compliant license, or non open source licenses, and you need to review them closely before use.

Reuse

bikeshed releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of bikeshed

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

bikeshed Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for bikeshed.

bikeshed Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for bikeshed.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on bikeshed

Is returning only IDs for a JSON API collection allowed?

How to parse multi-line JSON response to exact a particular key's value?

Should JSON Api attributes element contain nested objects?

Is there any reliable source of advice that advocates for or against using Optional as an object transform mechanism

QUESTION

Is returning only IDs for a JSON API collection allowed?

Asked 2019-Nov-07 at 12:25

So let's say I have a resources called articles. These have a numeric id and you can access them under something such as:

GET /articles/1 for a specific article.

And let's say that returns something like:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2019-Nov-07 at 12:25

The "attributes" object of a JSON-API doc does not need to be a complete representation:

attributes: an attributes object representing some of the resource’s data.

You can provide a "self" link to get the full representation, or perhaps even a "body" link to get just the body:

links: a links object containing links related to the resource.

E.g.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/58710527

QUESTION

How to parse multi-line JSON response to exact a particular key's value?

Asked 2019-Aug-07 at 11:58

I'm trying to parse a multi-line JSON response to get a value for a key using JavaScript. I read we can't parse multi-line json, how I can achieve getting "Created" value from below json?

I tried converting the JSON to string and used replace to converting multi-line to single line with \n as deliminator. -- Unable to replace multi-liner text.
I tried extracting index of mischief key value and remove from the string -- Syntax error.
...

ANSWER

Answered 2019-Aug-07 at 11:46

In your example i see syntax error

Try to change string definition "" to ``

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/57393640

QUESTION

Should JSON Api attributes element contain nested objects?

Asked 2019-Jul-03 at 07:51

This is the first time we are using JSON API in our projects and according to specification on their web, this is what a regular JSON API response should look like

...

ANSWER

Answered 2017-Jan-26 at 11:19

After Decoding your JSON, Result is -

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/41871321

QUESTION

Is there any reliable source of advice that advocates for or against using Optional as an object transform mechanism

Asked 2017-Apr-11 at 20:21

DISCLAIMER - I'm not looking for a discussion about this way of using the Optional class in Java, but rather pointers to reputable information that advocates for or against it.

I have found lately that using the Optional class in Java (or the Option class in JavaSlang) has been a handy way to represent the transformation of an object through a series of steps i.e.

...

ANSWER

Answered 2017-Apr-11 at 01:37

Optional is a monad and being such is a cornerstone of functional programming.

You ask if chaining monadic transformations is a well established pattern?

Certainly is.

There are many sources that speak of monads in functional programming for example Monadic Java or "What are monads in functional programming and why are they useful?" , or the whole philosophy behind ReactiveX and RXJava.

Looking for monads in functional programming will get you many results, I would not limit my search for just Java Optional.

A great source could be the Video - Lecture 1.4 - Monads in Functional Program Design in Scala course.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/43334561

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install bikeshed

You can download it from GitHub.

Support

For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .

Find more information at: