ev | explore the evolution of a function | Frontend Framework library

The CliXml serializer is exposed via the [PSSerializer] class:

The problem is that handler (ignoring the undefined, i.e. within the if block), is either a map EventA => Void or a map EventB => Void, whereas the input ev is either of type EventA or EventB. So from the compiler's perspective, it could be, for example, that handler is of type EventA => Promise, while ev is of type EventB, which then are not compatible. The type FindByTag does not reify an AnyEvent to an actual EventA or an EventB based on what K is.

As mentioned in the comments we can use htmlwidgets::onRender to pass custom JS.

With the help of the eachLayer method we can add an on-click function to each polygon layer (also see this related answer):

Does this do what you want? As far as I can tell it matches your output but has more rows because it includes all months for all carriers; carrier "OO" only has flights in 5 months and your version only shows those 5 months in the summary.

With the data as provided (336k rows), this takes a similar amount of time as your function, but it's faster as you deal with larger data. When I run these on data 100x as big after setting my_flights_raw <- my_flights_raw %>% tidyr::uncount(100), to make it 33M rows, the code below is about 40% faster.

Given the large number of groups you're dealing with, I expect this is a situation where data.table will really shine with better performance.

The problem is in this line: (FreeLog & UndefinedTask). Above intersection produces this type:

The main issue seems to be that you placed your "Main content" in one single row.
I managed to make it work doing something similar to this.

Also I moved the header and footer placeholders to thead and tfoot respectively.
Additionally, the "@page{margin: 5cm;}" seems to break it, to be honest I don't know why.
I had to modify the code quite a bit but I hope it helps you as a template for what you want to achieve.

This is the code I ended up with:

No, there is no way.

Think about what would happen if you call test with another implicit value of type SizeOfType[Unit] which defines type Size = Int.

Or said differently, the method test can only infer types based on the trait definition of SizeOfType, not on one actual implicit value content.

You could however define test as returning the type ev.Size.

So, the idea of trait MyTrait[A <: MyTrait[A]] { self: A => ... } is to force A to be the type of the current implementation.

If you omit the upper bound, then, aside from Foo not being able to do very much with its type parameter (it knows nothing about its members), you can also do things like this, which is not very useful.

Managed to make it work, you just have to update your library to the last version available in the cdn, you're using version 0.10.3, it should be 0.11.3.

https://cdnjs.com/libraries/typeahead.js/0.11.1