safe-eval | Safer version of eval | Runtime Evironment library

Here we learn that chrome bans any external resource or any script which includes eval() using something called the Content Security Policy.

I am also running a project with the same idea as yours and just ran into the same issue. It also mentions on that page some workarounds include:

1. Using a 'templating library' (A library which complies with the rules)

2. Access remote content (Send requests to an external server which does the processing there)

As far as I know there's no tensorflow.js which complies so #2 might be the only answer here.

Simply save output to a single dictionary variable of many items. Because your text split requires multiple steps, consider a defined method.

To allow communication between containers you need to setup a shared networks, e.g. in .yaml (this can be done as well as on ci, report in .yaml only for sake of code):

It appears that this was a known configuration issue on Stripe’s end and a fix was deployed. You shouldn’t be seeing these errors anymore. From what I can tell from Stripe’s discord server threads regarding these errors, r.stripe.com is just for tracking metrics so it should not have any impact on the ability to make payments.

It's important to note that the Webclient class uses the RETR command to download an FTP resource. For an HTTP resource, the GET method is used. That means if you provide a URL that doesn't contains the correct parameters to a downloadable file, you gonna end up with some exceptions that are not handled because Webclient was replaced with System.Net.Http.HttpClient, that I recommend you use instead.

Below you can see a exemple of how the Webclient works, on your case you are getting "useless error" because you are on a async method. I would suggest to use the normal method like below to debug and get the correct exception.

Try to use below sample setting in your web.config. I know you want use http://mysite:*.

I MUST maintain this line where she is.

That directive does not need to go inside the WordPress code block. You should place that directive before the # BEGIN WordPress comment marker. And this will prevent it from being overwritten by WordPress. In fact, you could place your custom rules at the very top of the file to make them easier to find/maintain.

It will work exactly the same.

You do not need to enclose it in an container like the other directives. And you should not repeat the RewriteEngine On and RewriteBase / directives. (The order of these particular directives do not matter. In fact, the last instance "wins" and controls the entire file.)

For example:

Depending on the GWT version you are using, GWT will usually create several JS files. IIRC and nothing is changed, you have - using the lasting GWT version - 5 permutations. These are the files with the cryptic name that the *.nochache.js is loading.

These permutation will be loaded from the code server. And by defining files inside the Content-Security-Policy tag, you define the files which can be loaded. And because the file names always change, you have no chance to add them.

So, why not using: