nc-example | an example inspired by nodeclub | Application Framework library

I'm using Azure Powershell 3.8.0

I'm trying to fetch the Object ID that can be seen in this screen:

I tried using the following:

I'm trying to understand MiniZincs geost constraint, which is described in the packing constraint section of the docs. I'm trying to implement 2D packing of rectangles with rotation: So I'd like to fit rectangles on a plate of given length and width, but I'm having a hard time understanding the expected input format.

I have the following model, where I read the number of parts or rectangles to be placed into nParts. nShapes is the number of shapes those rectangles can take.

I am new to FP-TS and still don't quite understand how to work with TaskEither. I am attempting to asynchronously read a file and then parse the resulting string with yaml-parse-promise.

==EDIT==

I updated the code with the full contents of the file to give more context and applied some of the suggestions provided by MnZrK. Sorry I am still new to FP-TS and I am still struggling with getting the types to match up.

Now my error is with the the map(printConfig) line:

I'm experimenting with futures with WASM, using wasm-bindgen-futures and the rust-webpack-template; the full working code and problem code is available.

My experiment is to call an async fn run(), wrapped by a fn run_js() -> js_sys::Promise, from JavaScript. The following is working:

Could anyone help me understand how I can abstract away apollo graphQL logic to convert between using apollo with HOC versus using the more modern ({data, loading})=>() syntax? Or if I can't do that, how you can use HOCs in a sub component that is not the whole page itself? I'm using next-apollo-appsync to handle all of my graphQL issues:

I have a requirement for adding dynamic tabs to some User Preferences screen. The main preference tab can be a static tab with static content, but the second tab should have nested mat-tab elements.

These additional dynamic preferences come from the backend, which then allows me to use an *ngFor to render the extra tabs.

Problem I'm seeing now is with the tab labels. The label text is taking its value from the first nested tab, and NOT from the label property I'm setting.

Please see my example here on stackblitz - https://stackblitz.com/edit/mat-tabs-nested?embed=1&file=app/tab-group-async-example.html

A code snippet from the online project is:

I want to install MAGMA in a server(centos) in order to use the GEMM function.

I have installed CUDA and MKL in this server before i install MAGMA, and i check both is run well by runing a cuBLAS example program and a MKL example program.

Before i describe what i haved happened i must point it seem that there is no fortran in this server. So i install MAGMA by follows:

1. I move make.inc-examples/make.inc.mkl-gcc to ../make.inc
2. I modify make.inc:

I commented out:

• FORT = gfortran
• FFLAGS = -O3 $(FPIC) -DNDEBUG -DADD_ -Wall -Wno-unused-dummy-argument
• F90FLAGS = -O3 $(FPIC) -DNDEBUG -DADD_ -Wall -Wno-unused-dummy-argument -x f95-cpp-input

and remove -lgfortran in

• LIB = -lmkl_gf_lp64 -lmkl_gnu_thread -lmkl_core -lpthread -lstdc++ -lm -lgfortran

and i also set MKLROOT=/home/lixin/intel/mkl and CUDADIR=/usr/local/cuda in this file.

1. I run make install prefix=/home/lixin/install/, it seem well and i haven't see any error tag.
2. I run make test, it cause error soon:

There is a technique I've seen a few times with foldr. It involves using a function in place of the accumulator in a foldr. I'm wondering when it is necessary to do this, as opposed to using an accumulator that is just a regular value.

Most people have seen this technique before when using foldr to define foldl:

When running the code I get an error of

ERROR:tornado.application:Future exception was never retrieved: Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Users\Ben\AppData\Local\Programs\Python\Python36\lib\site-packages\tornado\gen.py", line 1069, in run yielded = self.gen.send(value) File "C:\Users\Ben\Documents\GitHub\app-development\server\server.py", line 20, in serve self.write(r) File "C:\Users\Ben\AppData\Local\Programs\Python\Python36\lib\site-packages\tornado\web.py", line 708, in write raise RuntimeError("Cannot write() after finish()") RuntimeError: Cannot write() after finish()

Why is this happening? I referenced this question (second answer) I believe I am using the yield statement correctly.