swagger-ui | 汉化了swagger-ui,修改了部分样式 | User Interface library
kandi X-RAY | swagger-ui Summary
kandi X-RAY | swagger-ui Summary
汉化了swagger-ui,修改了部分样式
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of swagger-ui
swagger-ui Key Features
swagger-ui Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on swagger-ui
QUESTION
This app worked for a long time in docker container and recently it even doesn't launch.
In docker container I've this error:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Apr-07 at 18:09The @nestjs/cli
dev dependency should be up on version 8 with the rest of the @nestjs/
dependencies. @nestjs/cli
v5 doesn't have a start
command
QUESTION
I have swagger (docker: swaggerapi/swagger-ui) running on swagger.mydomain.com with two definitions for api servers running on a.mydomain.com and b.mydomain.com
Both a and b are flask (python) servers. a.mydomain.com had CORS set up for a while now due to serving a webapp on a fourth subdomain. This works fine both on that subdomain, as well as in swagger. Now I did the same CORS setup for b.mydomain.com, however without success.
The setup on both servers looks like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-17 at 23:52A 400 is a pretty unusual response code for a preflight response. That suggests the endpoint might be configured to expect a certain request body/payload or headers in the request regardless of what the HTTP method is for the request. But since for the preflight OPTIONS
request, the browser sends no request body and no additional header, the server code is not receiving what it expects.
For such cases, the fix is to ensure you have a specific, separate handler for OPTIONS
requests configured for that route/endpoint.
QUESTION
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-07 at 08:13I got the solution
I created this Custom DocumentFiler thats sorts the Tags
QUESTION
I'm trying to initiate a Springboot project using Open Jdk 15, Springboot 2.6.0, Springfox 3. We are working on a project that replaced Netty as the webserver and used Jetty instead because we do not need a non-blocking environment.
In the code we depend primarily on Reactor API (Flux, Mono), so we can not remove org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-webflux
dependencies.
I replicated the problem that we have in a new project.: https://github.com/jvacaq/spring-fox.
I figured out that these lines in our build.gradle file are the origin of the problem.
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-08 at 12:36This problem's caused by a bug in Springfox. It's making an assumption about how Spring MVC is set up that doesn't always hold true. Specifically, it's assuming that MVC's path matching will use the Ant-based path matcher and not the PathPattern-based matcher. PathPattern-based matching has been an option for some time now and is the default as of Spring Boot 2.6.
As described in Spring Boot 2.6's release notes, you can restore the configuration that Springfox assumes will be used by setting spring.mvc.pathmatch.matching-strategy
to ant-path-matcher
in your application.properties
file. Note that this will only work if you are not using Spring Boot's Actuator. The Actuator always uses PathPattern-based parsing, irrespective of the configured matching-strategy
. A change to Springfox will be required if you want to use it with the Actuator in Spring Boot 2.6 and later.
QUESTION
I'm creating an api using docker, postgresql, and nodejs (typescript). I've had this error ever since creating an admin user and nothing seems to be able to fix it:
Error in docker terminal:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-24 at 06:02It looks like you have a service named database_ignite
in your docker-compose.yml
file. Docker by default creates a host using the name of your service. Try changing your host from database
inside your index.ts
file to database_ignite
:
QUESTION
I'm trying to use SpringFox.
Spring Boot version: 'org.springframework.boot:3.0.0-SNAPSHOT'
build.gradle
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-21 at 07:08Spring Boot 3.0 is built for Java17 and JakartaEE, not JavaEE. Spring Boot 3 is still under development and hasn't seen a final release yet. There has been no official release date yet, but expect nothing sooner than Q4 of 2022. Until then I wouldn't consider Spring Boot 3 for production (or maybe when they start releasing Release Candidates).
That being said, there is currently no SpringFox release that supports JakartaEE and therefore isn't usable with Spring Boot 3 (see this). So until that has been resolved the combination of SpringFox and Spring Boot 3 won't work.
Use 2.6.x (which at this moment is the latest release version of Spring Boot).
QUESTION
We have 2 docker containers, 1 each for identity server and another for an application. I am able to authorize the swagger page but when I execute an end-point in the swagger page, I see Internal Server 500 error.
Below is the response while using edge dev-tools: Status 500 while SetCsrfCookie //initiator abp.swagger.js
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-23 at 08:44You should enable the ShowPII
flag first to get an actual error message.
How this is done is answered here.
In my case the URL used to fetch the discovery document was wrong but it could be really anything. The actual error message will give you a glue.
QUESTION
I am trying to connect my e-commerce project backend to swagger2. I have installed all the dependencies, yet I still cannot do it.
This is the dependency declared in my pom.xml file:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-05 at 20:10Swagger2's usage seems to require (or at least often includes) the concept of a Docket
api via an instantiation such as new Docket()
or new Docket(DocumentationType.SWAGGER_2)
. I don't see that in your code snippets, so wonder if that may be one issue.
Per the swagger docs, Docket
is Springfox’s primary api configuration mechanism.
Specifically, this section regarding configuration may be helpful. Note the Docket
instantiation:
QUESTION
So, I have a function-based view on a DRF application that looks something like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-01 at 17:45I'm not sure this could be done with vanilla DRF. The best schema generator for Django being supported now, as far as I know, is drf-spectacular
. So if you are using drf-spectacular
, you have to document it this way:
QUESTION
I'm using Spring boot 2.5.5 with AspectJ 1.9.7 (CTW). I've spotted that sometimes transactions don't roll back and to fix that I need only recompile code and run it again. For example:
I have method addB() persisting entity B, method addC() throwing exception and method A() combining them. When I call A(), exception is thrown, but entity B stays in database (as expected). When I annotate method A() with @Transactional result is the same. But if I build everything again (without any changes) then transaction is being rollbacked and there is no new record in database.
Here is my full POM:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-27 at 01:01I cannot reproduce the problem because IDEA does not find the Lombok setters. Even when delegating build actions before run to Maven, I get NoSuchMethodError: '...TestEntity.setCode(java.lang.String)'
. Next, I am going to try without Lombok. Please note that Lombok and AspectJ do not play nice with each other, see my answer here. Alternatively, you could also make sure that Maven does either of these:
- First build with Javac + Lombok, then apply AspectJ binary weaving in a second step, all in one module.
- Similar to above, but do the first build step in module A and the second one in a separate module B. Then you have an unwoven and a woven artifact, which you can both use according to your preferences. For example, you could also use the unwoven one and apply transaction aspects via load-time weaving (LTW) while starting the application. See my other answer here for both approaches #1 and #2.
- Delombok the source code build the generated sources with the AspectJ compiler in a second build step.
I generated constructors, getters and setters in the IDE instead of using Lombok. Now the project compiles in both IDE and Maven. It behaves exactly as it should. With @Transactional
, 0 entities are created, without it 2.
I am not sure if Lombok vs. AspectJ really is the problem due to non-compileability when using Lombok annotations, but it should be easy enough to try without Lombok for you. If it works in your context, too, we found the culprit and can think about implementing one of the 3 approaches mentioned above. Then you can tell me if you have any difficulty in doing so.
Update: I created the two-module version - Javac + Lombok, then Aspect weaving - for you in my fork and also issued pull request #1. I also improved testability a bit. See if that works for you.
Caveat: You cannot simply run DemoApplication
from the application-lombok
module, because that module is still unwoven and will not show transactional behaviour. But you can simply change the classpath for the run config to the application-aspectj
module:
Update: As we found out in the comment section of the other answer, in addition to the problematic Lombok vs. AspectJ compiler configuration, the OP also simply had a problem with his IDE: Using IntelliJ IDEA Community Edition, he was first unaware of, then unable to install the AspectJ plugin, which means that IDEA does not know antyhing about the AspectJ compiler and simply overwrites anything which might have been compiled by AspectJ Maven before with plain Java classes. Therefore, transactional aspects do not work either, unless
- either pre-run compilation is disabled and
mvn compile
started as an additional pre-build step for the corresponding run configuration, - or all build actions for the project are being delegated to Maven via configuration,
- the OP buys a licence of IDEA Ultimate and installs the AspectJ plugin.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
Install swagger-ui
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page