folding | rendered output of FoldingText in a intelligible way | Frontend Framework library

The problem actually disappears when I downgraded Xcode to 12.4. I was hoping that this bug is only relative to Big Sur + Xcode 12.5, but unfortunately macOS 12 beta and Xcode 13 beta are just as broken.

The suitable workaround is to keep 2 versions of Xcode installed. 12.4 for the actual development, 12.5 or later for debugging applications on the device. For me it's Xcode 13 beta that I use to run on my iPhone with iOS 15.

I think the most similar thing to what you are asking for are Workspaces. From testing, they do in fact keep the files you had open, so long as you close the workspace in the menu first.

A Visual Studio Code "workspace" is the collection of one or more folders that are opened in a VS Code window (instance). In most cases, you will have a single folder opened as the workspace but, depending on your development workflow, you can include more than one folder, using an advanced configuration called Multi-root workspaces.

The concept of a workspace enables VS Code to:

• Configure settings that only apply to a specific folder or folders but not others.
• Persist task and debugger launch configurations that are only valid in the context of that workspace.
• Store and restore UI state associated with that workspace (for example, the files that are opened).
• Selectively enable or disable extensions only for that workspace.

If you look under File, you'll see the Workspace options:

The way it works is it saves a file that is a .code-workspace extension, but really the underlying structure is JSON. For example, the file might look like:

As the comments mentions, you should look for a pattern in the sections (4 corners) and not in the total parts. We will enumerate the corners as a vector like this:

(a (top left),b (top Right) ,c (bottom left) ,d (bottom Right))

Also for sake of consistency and understanding we always fold from right to left in the vertical fold (right half on top of the left half) and from bottom to top in the horizontal fold (bottom half on top of the top half) and we start with horizontal as the first fold we will preform.

first we start with 1 in each corner so when we divide we get the sum of all corners like this:

(1,1,1,1) = 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 4 (n = 0)

lets see what will happen in each corner after few runs:

(2,1,2,1) = 2 + 1 + 2 + 1 = 6 (n = 1)

(4,2,2,1) = 4 + 2 + 2 + 1 = 9 (n = 2)

(6,3,4,2) = 6 + 3 + 4 + 2 = 15 (n = 3)

(9,6,6,4) = 9 + 6 + 6 + 4 = 25 (n = 4)

maybe at first its hard to see the relation between but actually the pattern is pretty simple:

(a,b,c,d) -> (a+b,a,c+d,c) when you fold vertically (from right to left)

and

(a,b,c,d) -> (a+c,b+d,a,b) when you fold horizontally (from bottom to top)

so you can get the recursive relationship and here some simple code in C for this:

For each item you need to create a data object containing both fields. Simple Pair should be sufficient here:

Wrap it in a function and fold the function...

Is because your after has content Afficher toutes les infos only when button has class collapsed and your HTML start without this class, so you just need add the collapsed class in default html, right there:

As OP said, the answer was to replace all the tags by s (+ SSR and apollo prefetch in his case).

The reason was very simple, and I should have understood it immediately. Power saving mode was enabled in the OS, which reduced the clock frequency of the CPU under low load. The moral is, always disable power saving when benchmarking!

As per Unicode stability policy, case mappings are only stable for case pairs, i.e. pairs of characters X and Y where X is the full uppercase mapping of Y, and Y is the full lowercase mapping of X. Only when both these characters exist with these properties is the casing relation between them set in stone.

However, Unicode contains many “incomplete” case pairs where only the lowercase form has been encoded and the uppercase form is missing completely. This is usually the case for letters used in transcription systems that are traditionally lowercase-only. Should capital forms be discovered and subsequently added to Unicode, these letters would then receive a new uppercase mapping.

The most recent characters this has happened to are “ʂ” (from Unicode 1.1), “ᶎ” (from Unicode 4.1), and “ꞔ” (from Unicode 7.0), which all got brand new uppercase forms (Ꞔ, Ʂ, Ᶎ) in Unicode 12.0 two years ago.

Because case mappings do not have to be unique, this makes uppercasing a poor substitute for proper case-folding. For example, both U+0434 (д) and U+1C81 (ᲁ) uppercase to U+0414 (Д), but only the former is locked into a case pair by virtue of being U+0414’s full lowercase mapping. If someone were to find a dedicated capital letter version of U+1C81 in some old manuscript, it would be given a new uppercase mapping, resulting in U+0434 and U+1C81 suddenly no longer comparing equal under that operation.

EDIT: I have just remembered a current example of uppercasing not being sufficient for case-insensitive matching: U+1E9E (ẞ) is already a capital letter and thus uppercases to itself. Its lowercase counterpart is U+00DF (ß), but the uppercase mapping of U+00DF is the sequence (SS).