rollup | rollup implementation | Blockchain library

Is anyone using Vite to bundle their MUI app? I was surprised at how big my vendor chunk (1.1MB) was from Vite/Rollup. I've come up with the below config which separates MUI packages into it's own chunk:

I have an NPM package I am working on which has a dependency of react. I then have a test app which has react installed as a dependency. When I import my npm package into the test app, I get the following error:

Invalid hook call. Hooks can only be called inside of the body of a function component. This could happen for one of the following reasons:

1. You might have mismatching versions of React and the renderer (such as React DOM)
2. You might be breaking the Rules of Hooks
3. You might have more than one copy of React in the same app

Running npm ls react in my test app suggests I might have a duplicate of react:

In a NORMAL Svelte project (no SvelteKit) the static files are in the public directory and when running npm run build (rollup -c) the src folder is compiled into public/build and the public folder can then be hosted somewhere.

I now switched (an already existing) Svelte project to Vite and the static files are still under public but when running npm run build (vite build), everything is bundled into the dist directory. So all the files in the public directory are actually copied and exist twice in the project. Which means when changing or adding something (which doesn't effect the app logic) the project needs to be rebuild before it can be redeployed.

Can this be changed via the configuration, that either all compiled files are added again to the public directory or that the static files reside directly inside dist and nothing is copied during the build process?

Edit: The project should still be able to be run in dev mode npm run dev (vite) with the assets being served

At my job, I need to take some granular data collected in a twentieth of a mile and then roll it up to a tenth of a mile. This task is done with python scripts, but I was wondering if I can do it with a materialized view. Here is an example of what the data looks like it is simplest form, and what I would like the view to look like.

Simplest form:

This is what I want the view to produce:

I have tried using the rollup, sum, MOD, remainder, but not sure how to use them correctly. I'm not even sure if this is possible through a view or not.

I will accept all suggestions and ideas.

I want to change the value of a variable in js file using php, what i tried so far is to get the file contents and try to find a robust regex formula to change the value of the variable:

here is the contents of the js file, keeping in mind that the value can be anything between = and ;

I have the following formula in a signalfx chart, but it's not showing any results because F has 0 timeseries. How can I display it as 0 instead of this blank line.

In a Svelte component, I'm trying to access an object I set up in my rollup config file. My rollup.config.js file looks like this:

I have this Jscharting script which loads data from a csv file. It works great, but unfortunately it doesn't load at all if there is any empty data in the source. How would you add handling empty data into following script?

I'm writing a React library MyLibrary and bundling it with Rollup.js 2.58.3. I use jest for unit testing.

I am unable to mock a module from my library using jest. This is due to the way rollup "compiles" my code.

Rollup uses its code splitting functionality to create many chunks. In one example, rollup splits Alpha.js into two chunks: Alpha.js and Alpha-xxxxxx.js. Some functionality from the original file is extracted to this "intermediate" chunk (Alpha-xxxxxx.js).

In my unit test, when mocking any method that was moved into the intermediate file Alpha-xxxxxx.js, jest seems to actually load the module from this "intermediate" module rather than the top level module.

This causes the test to fail.

e.g. jest.mock('MyLibrary/dist/Alpha') does not work since the modules are actually being loaded from Alpha-xxxxxx.js instead of Alpha.js

I have a two modules Alpha.js and Beta.js in MyLibrary.