ng-modules | Example Angular app with Gulp concatenation | Frontend Framework library

Off the bat, there's very little you can't do, as long as you're in control of the meta-object protocol. Anything that's syntactically possible, you could in principle do it using a specific kind of method, or class, declared using that. For instance, you could have a private-class which would be visible only to members of the same namespace (to the level that you would design). There's Metamodel::Trusting which defines, for a particular entity, who it does trust (please bear in mind that this is part of the implementation, not spec, and then subject to change).

A less scalable way would be to use trusts. The new, private modules would need to be classes and issue a trusts X for every class that would access it. That could include classes belonging to the same distribution... or not, that's up to you to decide. It's that Metamodel class above who supplies this trait, so using it directly might give you a greater level of control (with a lower level of programming)

Ok, this seems to do the trick

I am an Erlang newbie

Don't use import. No one else does. It's bad programming practice. Instead, call functions by their fully qualified names, i.e. moduleName:functionName

throws a undefined function error

You didn't compile the module you are trying to import. Also, you can't export a function that is not defined within a module.

Here's an example:

In Angular, there can only be one @angular set of code in your node_modules folder. that means only one version of Angular can be installed with your application.

A solution would be to build the new feature as a component library following this link: Building an Angular 4 Component Library with the Angular CLI and ng-packagr

But the best solution would be to move all your code to the later version.

This is actually not a configuration issue. Instead there is some dynamics in putting entries into the module.paths array. On Unix (not on Windows), if the node binary should be treated securely, certain entries stemming from unsecure environment variables are not included in the module.paths array.

More precisely, if the node binary has set-user-ID or set-group-ID or has capabilities, the entries stemming from the environment variables HOME and NODE_PATH will not be included in the module.paths array, which are exactly the three entries mentioned as missing by the question.

To solve my problem I will copy the node binary so that I have two: node for "normal" execution (running javascript scripts) and nodeServer, which will get the capabilities (to use low port numbers), for execution as an http-server.

Even more precisely, if the AT_SECURE entry of the auxiliary vector has a non-zero value (see man getauxval), the three entries

I guess I'll be answering my own question.

When I follow the instructions on the GCC wiki (https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/cxx-modules) it's a newer version compared to the one found on svn.

The svn has a version 10 of gcc while github has version 11.

When I compile the version for github (g++ (GCC) 11.0.0 20201217 (experimental) [c++-modules revision 20201220-2203]) the examples provided by the GCC Wiki compile and work. These files are hello.cpp:

There is no XML-RPC functionality built into PowerShell.

Providing such functionality therefore requires third-party code.

In your case, it seems your script requires the XmlRpc module, available from the PowerShell Gallery here (which means you can install it with Install-Module XmlRpc).

However, this module was last updated more than 5 years ago, predating PowerShell's cross-platform edition, PowerShell (Core), so you'll have to find out yourself if it works on a Unix-like platform such as Ubuntu.

Static states defined on models still require a considerable amount of verbosity beyond generic mutation, and in direct reflection of your comment "this is no longer felt the vuex way", you may be better off breaking this sort of logic into its own module to keep some form of Vuex consistency.

You don't necessarily have to put your module in a separate file, this is a matter of opinion. You can declare and export your module in the same file:

The declaration of a module (e.g. pub mod module1) happens outside of that module. There are two kinds of module declarations: one where the definition is right after (inside braces), and one where the definition is in another file.

For modules in a separate file, you'll simply say pub mod module1; in that module's parent. For your structure, you'll want to have pub mod module1; and pub mod module2 in main.rs.

Inside the module file (e.g. src/module1/mod.rs), you don't need pub mod module1 at all. You can just have its items directly in the file.

So your setup should be