es6-modules | ES6 modules and how they transpile to existing module | Document Editor library
kandi X-RAY | es6-modules Summary
kandi X-RAY | es6-modules Summary
:rocket: Demonstration of ES6 modules and how they transpile to existing module formats
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Interpolate obj with defaults
- Interpolate obj with default module
- Subtract from b
- Adds two or numbers
es6-modules Key Features
es6-modules Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on es6-modules
QUESTION
I've just started using eslint. I initialized it and started fixing problems it pointed out. One problem, however, it shouldn't complain about:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-01 at 07:18This is happening because ESLint does not know that your code is supposed to be used in Node.js: __dirname
is not defined in browsers and also not defined in ES modules. To tell ESLint that your code will run in Node.js as a CommonJS module, open your ESLint config and set node: true
in the env
section. If you are using .eslintrc.json:
QUESTION
I am struggling to use javascript modules...
I have an html file and a JS module. I have a function defined in the javascript file and I would like to call that function from my HTML page. This is my code
index.html
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-08 at 19:32First of all you have to explicitly export you function:
QUESTION
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-10 at 09:43what I already did is tried the following steps but they did not work
- Added flag '--experimental-modules' in node starting script
npm install esm --save
//this also did not work
But now finally i found a solution which not requires you to rename your .js files to .mjs also it will not require your node to be upgraded if you are alraedy running Node.Js version 12 or above
simply downgrade your swagger-jsdoc to 6.1.0, which is built with CommonJS tools, at first i was using swagger-jsdoc 7.x which was not built using CommonJS tools to downgrade the swagger-jsdoc use the following command of npm
QUESTION
Can't understand the difference between the two examples that I just read at the end of the Deno manual section on the deno bundle
command:
Bundles can also be loaded in the web browser. The bundle is a self-contained ES module, and so the attribute of type must be set to "module". For example:
...
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-04 at 23:11I was under the impression that both forms achieve the same effect
Yes, both of these will have the same effect
(i.e., "fetched and executed immediately, before the browser continues to parse the page"),
No, that any
QUESTION
The only similar question I have found is this one but I can't see how would I have caused a circular dependancy in this case:
I have a file exporting constants like so:
(choices array version is for using in Select inputs and the other one secures from typing errors in condition checks)
payments.constants.js
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Dec-17 at 18:27Ok, in the end it was really a circular dependancy but a really complicated one because of a long chain of files imports. Something like:
QUESTION
I encounter a puzzling problem when composing a complexe class hierarchy, each class being exported from separate ES6-modules-like files, with mixins involved.
Here's a simplified exemple reproducing my problem:
File "mixinA.ts":
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Dec-03 at 22:19Congratulations on your first post!
Try this:
QUESTION
Building a component with Reason and React always gives me an module import statement for "react", which cannot be found if React is included from a CDN. Is there a solution for this? I've tried to define window.react = React
in index.html without success. es6-global
setting does not change anything.
I'm not using a bundling program like webpack.
Edit: Possibly relevant thread from Reason forum: https://reasonml.chat/t/can-one-load-reasonml-es6-modules-without-a-bundler/2219
Similar issue (not resolved): can one load reasonml es6 modules without a bundler
importmap
(not yet implemented in browsers) could be another solution for this: Using ES6 Modules without a Transpiler/Bundler step
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Nov-07 at 00:24Technically, yes you can, but it's not going to be as easy as going with the npm flow and using a bundler.
The ReasonReact bindings are written in a way that produces output JavaScript that imports modules like:
QUESTION
Here's my module:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jun-03 at 13:42Your guess is correct, it's happening because of bundler. Its a feature of bundler known as Dead code elimination. To know more about it, search for Tree Shaking
or Dead code elimination
.
If you are not going to use anything from imported module, source code of module will not be included in your build.
I think create-react-app
use Webpack
for bundling. If you want to disable the feature, starting the app in development
mode may solve it. BTW, its good to remove unused code while building.
QUESTION
I have seen a large code base where every file with constants looks something like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Mar-30 at 19:01Is there any use case for this practice?
Not really. The only thing I can think of is backwards-compatibility, possibly related to how they are transpiling their code, if the module is a library used elsewhere.
The only reason I can think of is that this approach can give more flexibility when it comes to importing constants.
A default export is not necessary for that. You can easily use a namespace import with named exports only:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install es6-modules
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page