higher-order-components | useful React higher-order components | Frontend Framework library
kandi X-RAY | higher-order-components Summary
kandi X-RAY | higher-order-components Summary
Note: This project is now deprecated. This library is a collection of useful React higher-order Components.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Inject styles after animating
- Registers and adds new styles to the screen .
- Creates a new Target .
- creates a replacement element .
- ButtonSwitch implementation .
- Un - dirty style indicator
- ButtonSwitch class .
- Show a deprecation warning
- Inject styles into a style element .
- Empty an empty animation name
higher-order-components Key Features
higher-order-components Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on higher-order-components
QUESTION
I am trying to create a recursive component that stores it's state in a mobx observable object.
For some peculiar reason, if the observable links another observable in it's properties, the observer
hoc from mobx-react-lite does not trigger re-render, when the observable state changes.
Here is the example, where the elements, that are more than 1 deep, are not re-rendered, when the observable state changes.
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-03 at 19:59You are exporting observer
component (export default memo(observer(NodeView));
), but inside NodeView
itself you are using non-observer NodeView
You need to wrap it with observer right away, so recursive version would be reactive too:
QUESTION
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Sep-10 at 00:49Conceptually HOC connect is something like this:
QUESTION
In this link https://reactjs.org/docs/higher-order-components.html where explanation is of higher order component.The code is below has class extends React.component. What is this class keyword here?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-16 at 11:37It is an unnamed class expression.
QUESTION
I have a sample placeholder component that consumes two required props:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jan-27 at 11:26TS will not be able to follow that WrapperProvides & Omit
is the same as T
. You can either use a type assertion
QUESTION
The React docs have the following piece of code to extract the name of a component in an HOC (function getDisplayName). See the getDisplayName implementation below.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jan-06 at 08:31So in what cases will the function fail to get the component name ?
If the given component neither has a displayName
or is not a function or class e.g. when it was created with React.forwardRef
.
And if so, any ways to mitigate/handle such cases ?
There's currently no public API for this case. Subscribe to https://github.com/facebook/react/issues/14319 for updates on this issue.
QUESTION
I'm new to TypeScript with React and I have (already) two HOCs in React and I would like to compose
them because it is likely that there will be more.
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Dec-11 at 18:05If you go to rambda compose
typing you'll see that it's generic, so you can define what would be the resulting function, typing it like this removes the error
QUESTION
I'm trying to create a reusable component, which alters it's behaviour - essentially rendering to either SVG or Canvas. I'm currently trying to do this by wrapping it up in a HoC (however I'm trying to use React hooks) so this is all falling a bit flat on it's face.
Edit with extra info
With the current approach (HoC returning a function) I get the following error:
Functions are not valid as a React child. This may happen if you return a Component instead of from render. Or maybe you meant to call this function rather than return it.
If I remove the function call within the HoC's:
React.jsx: type is invalid -- expected a string (for built-in components) or a class/function (for composite components) but got: object
I've seen an example of converting HoC's to React hooks, but I'm struggling to work out how I might convert this - if it's even possible and wondering if anyone can give me a pointer? I might have tried to architect this the wrong way, as it feels like quite a complex use case.
So I've these 2 HoC's at the moment which I feel like I need to refactor somehow to use hooks called withSVG
and withCanvas
. They setup different DOM to be represented and importantly one has a function called renderLoop
which needs to be called from the Scatter component below.
Slightly quirky, is because the Scatter
is just business logic now (leveraging dependencies in the useEffect), it doesn't actually need to return any DOM, because it's just manipulating the DOM of the parent HoC. I'm expecting many more components like Scatter
in the future however so don't want to move this logic into the HoCs (if they're even the right way of doing this).
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Nov-20 at 09:50I think you have malformed your Higher Order Components. It appears you've defined them to consume some props, then a component to wrap.
QUESTION
Following this react-firestore-tutorial
and the GitHub code. I wonder if the following is correct way to use the onAuthStateChanged
or if I have understod this incorrect I'm just confused if this is the right way.
CodeSandBox fully connect with a test-account with apikey to Firebase!! so you can try it what I mean and I can learn this.
(NOTE: Firebase is blocking Codesandbox url even it's in Authorised domains, sorry about that but you can still see the code)
t {code: "auth/too-many-requests", message: "We have blocked all requests from this device due to unusual activity. Try again later.", a: null}a:
Note this is a Reactjs-Vanilla fully fledge advanced website using only;
React 16.6
React Router 5
Firebase 7
Here in the code the Firebase.js
have this onAuthStateChanged
and its called from two different components and also multiple times and what I understand one should only set it up once and then listen for it's callback. Calling it multiple times will that not create many listeners?
Can someone have a look at this code is this normal in Reactjs to handle onAuthStateChanged
?
(src\components\Firebase\firebase.js)
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Oct-22 at 04:20This is normal. onAuthStateChanged
receives an observer function to which a user object is passed if sign-in is successful, else not.
Author has wrapped onAuthStateChanged
with a higher order function – onAuthUserListener
. The HOF receives two parameters as functions, next
and fallback
. These two parameters are the sole difference when creating HOC's withAuthentication
and withAuthorization
.
The former's next
parameter is a function which stores user data on localStorage
QUESTION
I find that I am having to reimplement a lot of the same functionality. For example, with the next 3 components I am implementing the same code for style
, className
and id
. I know that I can have {...props}
as the argument instead hear, and then pass {...props}
to the container inside the return function, but I am not able to do this if I want these components to each have their own classNames and styles that are always assigned to each instance of these classes. I looked into higher-order-components a bit, but couldn't wrap my head around how I would use them in this case
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Oct-07 at 20:39One approach would be to have a function that returns your component function:
QUESTION
I've implemented a HOC withProvider
with class
based component :
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Sep-09 at 12:14A functional form of HOC is as the following:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install higher-order-components
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page