higher-order-components | useful React higher-order components | Frontend Framework library

 by   klarna JavaScript Version: v6.3.0 License: MIT

kandi X-RAY | higher-order-components Summary

kandi X-RAY | higher-order-components Summary

higher-order-components is a JavaScript library typically used in User Interface, Frontend Framework, React applications. higher-order-components has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. You can install using 'npm i @klarna/higher-order-components' or download it from GitHub, npm.

Note: This project is now deprecated. This library is a collection of useful React higher-order Components.
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              higher-order-components has a low active ecosystem.
              It has 117 star(s) with 15 fork(s). There are 277 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 12 months.
              There are 9 open issues and 8 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 49 days. There are 9 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of higher-order-components is v6.3.0

            kandi-Quality Quality

              higher-order-components has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

            kandi-Security Security

              higher-order-components has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.
              higher-order-components code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.
              There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

            kandi-License License

              higher-order-components is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.
              Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              higher-order-components releases are available to install and integrate.
              Deployable package is available in npm.
              Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.
              higher-order-components saves you 4 person hours of effort in developing the same functionality from scratch.
              It has 12 lines of code, 0 functions and 50 files.
              It has low code complexity. Code complexity directly impacts maintainability of the code.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi has reviewed higher-order-components and discovered the below as its top functions. This is intended to give you an instant insight into higher-order-components implemented functionality, and help decide if they suit your requirements.
            • Inject styles after animating
            • Registers and adds new styles to the screen .
            • Creates a new Target .
            • creates a replacement element .
            • ButtonSwitch implementation .
            • Un - dirty style indicator
            • ButtonSwitch class .
            • Show a deprecation warning
            • Inject styles into a style element .
            • Empty an empty animation name
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            higher-order-components Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for higher-order-components.

            higher-order-components Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for higher-order-components.

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            Why Mobx observer is not triggering re-render on React recurrent component?
            Asked 2022-Jan-04 at 11:53

            I am trying to create a recursive component that stores it's state in a mobx observable object.

            For some peculiar reason, if the observable links another observable in it's properties, the observer hoc from mobx-react-lite does not trigger re-render, when the observable state changes.

            Here is the example, where the elements, that are more than 1 deep, are not re-rendered, when the observable state changes.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Jan-03 at 19:59

            You are exporting observer component (export default memo(observer(NodeView));), but inside NodeView itself you are using non-observer NodeView

            You need to wrap it with observer right away, so recursive version would be reactive too:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70568283

            QUESTION

            How to maximize composability with React higher-order functions?
            Asked 2021-Sep-10 at 00:49

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Sep-10 at 00:49

            Conceptually HOC connect is something like this:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69125758

            QUESTION

            what is class extends React.component in React
            Asked 2021-Mar-16 at 11:37

            In this link https://reactjs.org/docs/higher-order-components.html where explanation is of higher order component.The code is below has class extends React.component. What is this class keyword here?

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Mar-16 at 11:37

            QUESTION

            How to type higher order component that provides props
            Asked 2021-Jan-27 at 11:26

            I have a sample placeholder component that consumes two required props:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Jan-27 at 11:26

            TS will not be able to follow that WrapperProvides & Omit is the same as T. You can either use a type assertion

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65916569

            QUESTION

            Under what conditions might this piece of code (From the React docs) fail, or rather actually trigger the final fallback condition?
            Asked 2021-Jan-06 at 08:31

            The React docs have the following piece of code to extract the name of a component in an HOC (function getDisplayName). See the getDisplayName implementation below.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Jan-06 at 08:31

            So in what cases will the function fail to get the component name ?

            If the given component neither has a displayName or is not a function or class e.g. when it was created with React.forwardRef.

            And if so, any ways to mitigate/handle such cases ?

            There's currently no public API for this case. Subscribe to https://github.com/facebook/react/issues/14319 for updates on this issue.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65568953

            QUESTION

            TypeScript & React: compose higher-order components
            Asked 2020-Dec-11 at 18:05

            I'm new to TypeScript with React and I have (already) two HOCs in React and I would like to compose them because it is likely that there will be more.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Dec-11 at 18:05

            If you go to rambda compose typing you'll see that it's generic, so you can define what would be the resulting function, typing it like this removes the error

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65167644

            QUESTION

            Is it possible to turns this HoC pattern into a React Hook syntax?
            Asked 2020-Nov-20 at 18:13

            I'm trying to create a reusable component, which alters it's behaviour - essentially rendering to either SVG or Canvas. I'm currently trying to do this by wrapping it up in a HoC (however I'm trying to use React hooks) so this is all falling a bit flat on it's face.

            Edit with extra info

            With the current approach (HoC returning a function) I get the following error:

            Functions are not valid as a React child. This may happen if you return a Component instead of from render. Or maybe you meant to call this function rather than return it.

            If I remove the function call within the HoC's:

            React.jsx: type is invalid -- expected a string (for built-in components) or a class/function (for composite components) but got: object

            I've seen an example of converting HoC's to React hooks, but I'm struggling to work out how I might convert this - if it's even possible and wondering if anyone can give me a pointer? I might have tried to architect this the wrong way, as it feels like quite a complex use case.

            So I've these 2 HoC's at the moment which I feel like I need to refactor somehow to use hooks called withSVG and withCanvas. They setup different DOM to be represented and importantly one has a function called renderLoop which needs to be called from the Scatter component below.

            Slightly quirky, is because the Scatter is just business logic now (leveraging dependencies in the useEffect), it doesn't actually need to return any DOM, because it's just manipulating the DOM of the parent HoC. I'm expecting many more components like Scatter in the future however so don't want to move this logic into the HoCs (if they're even the right way of doing this).

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Nov-20 at 09:50
            Issue

            I think you have malformed your Higher Order Components. It appears you've defined them to consume some props, then a component to wrap.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64926365

            QUESTION

            I wonder if this really is the correct way to use onAuthStateChanged
            Asked 2020-Oct-27 at 21:05

            Following this react-firestore-tutorial and the GitHub code. I wonder if the following is correct way to use the onAuthStateChanged or if I have understod this incorrect I'm just confused if this is the right way.

            CodeSandBox fully connect with a test-account with apikey to Firebase!! so you can try it what I mean and I can learn this.

            (NOTE: Firebase is blocking Codesandbox url even it's in Authorised domains, sorry about that but you can still see the code)

            t {code: "auth/too-many-requests", message: "We have blocked all requests from this device due to unusual activity. Try again later.", a: null}a:

            Note this is a Reactjs-Vanilla fully fledge advanced website using only;
            React 16.6
            React Router 5
            Firebase 7

            Here in the code the Firebase.js have this onAuthStateChanged and its called from two different components and also multiple times and what I understand one should only set it up once and then listen for it's callback. Calling it multiple times will that not create many listeners?

            Can someone have a look at this code is this normal in Reactjs to handle onAuthStateChanged? (src\components\Firebase\firebase.js)

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Oct-22 at 04:20

            This is normal. onAuthStateChanged receives an observer function to which a user object is passed if sign-in is successful, else not.

            Author has wrapped onAuthStateChanged with a higher order function – onAuthUserListener. The HOF receives two parameters as functions, next and fallback. These two parameters are the sole difference when creating HOC's withAuthentication and withAuthorization.

            The former's next parameter is a function which stores user data on localStorage

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64373602

            QUESTION

            Is it possible to implement an inheritance like mechanism for React components in order to reduce nearly duplicate code?
            Asked 2020-Oct-07 at 20:39

            I find that I am having to reimplement a lot of the same functionality. For example, with the next 3 components I am implementing the same code for style, className and id. I know that I can have {...props} as the argument instead hear, and then pass {...props} to the container inside the return function, but I am not able to do this if I want these components to each have their own classNames and styles that are always assigned to each instance of these classes. I looked into higher-order-components a bit, but couldn't wrap my head around how I would use them in this case

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Oct-07 at 20:39

            One approach would be to have a function that returns your component function:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64251482

            QUESTION

            How to convert class HOC to Functional HOC?
            Asked 2020-Sep-09 at 12:14

            I've implemented a HOC withProvider with class based component :

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Sep-09 at 12:14

            A functional form of HOC is as the following:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63811391

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install higher-order-components

            You can install using 'npm i @klarna/higher-order-components' or download it from GitHub, npm.

            Support

            For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries

            Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link