jquery-tinyvalidate | A tiny form validation plugin | Validation library

 by   kswedberg JavaScript Version: 1.13.2 License: No License

kandi X-RAY | jquery-tinyvalidate Summary

kandi X-RAY | jquery-tinyvalidate Summary

jquery-tinyvalidate is a JavaScript library typically used in Utilities, Validation applications. jquery-tinyvalidate has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities and it has low support. You can install using 'npm i jquery-tinyvalidate' or download it from GitHub, npm.

A (relatively) tiny form validation plugin

            kandi-support Support

              jquery-tinyvalidate has a low active ecosystem.
              It has 16 star(s) with 2 fork(s). There are 3 watchers for this library.
              It had no major release in the last 12 months.
              jquery-tinyvalidate has no issues reported. There are no pull requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of jquery-tinyvalidate is 1.13.2

            kandi-Quality Quality

              jquery-tinyvalidate has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

            kandi-Security Security

              jquery-tinyvalidate has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.
              jquery-tinyvalidate code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.
              There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

            kandi-License License

              jquery-tinyvalidate does not have a standard license declared.
              Check the repository for any license declaration and review the terms closely.
              Without a license, all rights are reserved, and you cannot use the library in your applications.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              jquery-tinyvalidate releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.
              Deployable package is available in npm.
              Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.
              jquery-tinyvalidate saves you 283 person hours of effort in developing the same functionality from scratch.
              It has 683 lines of code, 0 functions and 16 files.
              It has low code complexity. Code complexity directly impacts maintainability of the code.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
            Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of jquery-tinyvalidate
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            jquery-tinyvalidate Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for jquery-tinyvalidate.

            jquery-tinyvalidate Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for jquery-tinyvalidate.

            Community Discussions


            Regex validation for time tracking
            Asked 2022-Apr-14 at 17:34

            I am trying to validate a string the way it is done in Jira in Javascript. I'm trying to replicate how it is validated in Jira. I am guessing I could do this with Regex but I am not sure how.

            A user can type a string in the format of "1d 6h 30m" which would mean 1 day, 6 hours, 30 minutes. I do not need the weeks for my use case. I want to show an error if the user uses an invalid character (anything except 'd','h','m', or ' '). Also the string must separate the time durations by spaces and ideally I would like to force the user to enter the time durations in descending order meaning '6h 1d' would be invalid because the days should come first. Also the user does not have to enter all information so '30m' would be valid.

            This is my code for getting the days, hours and minutes which seems to work. I just need help with the validation part.



            Answered 2022-Apr-14 at 16:30

            Based on your comment, I have added a validation regex to be run first before running the match regex.

            For validation, you want

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71874347


            how to skip json validation for an empty array via Golang
            Asked 2022-Feb-26 at 20:02

            I'd like to skip validation for empty arrays in a json file for a specific field. Below you can see Book structs definition, which could be validated if no authors are declared in json file. On the other hand it fails if an empty array is defined for authors. Is it possible to achieve this behavior with existing tags, or do I have to define custom validator?



            Answered 2022-Feb-26 at 20:02

            It's because your Authors validation string is "omitempty,min=1,dive,min=3". The length of an empty slice is 0, which is <1.

            If you replace the validation string with "omitempty,min=0,dive,min=3" instead, it'll pass.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71279829


            Rails 7 failed save only shows errors if I render with a status
            Asked 2022-Feb-22 at 12:33

            I've been working with rails for a while, but I thought I'd try a course to cement my knowledge.

            But I already get stumped on a basic save/error action.

            I am trying to show error messages after model validation fails.

            If the model validation fails, I render 'new'again, where the model instance should have error messages. But if I try to print the error messages like <%= modelinstance.errors.inspect %> it just shows an empty array.

            The weird thing is, if I instead do render :new, status: :unprocessable_entity it gladly renders the whole error thing.

            I was just wondering why this is the case, when the ruby on rails guide is allowing the string version.




            Answered 2022-Feb-22 at 12:33

            It's due to the introduction of Turbo in Rails 7. Without that status, Turbo wouldn't really know what to do with the redirects.

            You can read more about it here: https://turbo.hotwired.dev/handbook/drive#redirecting-after-a-form-submission

            Otherwise, you could just disable Turbo and it should go back to "normal".

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71218009


            Springboot: Better handling of error messages
            Asked 2022-Feb-03 at 10:12

            I'm developing an API with Spring Boot and currently, I'm thinking about how to handle error messages in an easily internationalizable way. My goals are as follows:

            1. Define error messages in resource files/bundles
            2. Connect constraint annotation with error messages (e.g., @Length) in a declarative fashion
            3. Error messages contain placeholders, such as {min}, that are replaced by the corresponding value from the annotation, if available, e.g., @Length(min = 5, message = msg) would result in something like msg.replace("{min}", annotation.min()).replace("{max}", annotation.max()).
            4. The JSON property path is also available as a placeholder and automatically inserted into the error message when a validation error occurs.
            5. A solution outside of an error handler is preferred, i.e., when the exceptions arrive in the error handler, they already contain the desired error messages.
            6. Error messages from a resource bundle are automatically registered as constants in Java.

            Currently, I customized the methodArgumentNotValidHandler of my error handler class to read ObjectErrors from e.getBindingResult().getAllErrors() and then try to extract their arguments and error codes to decide which error message to choose from my resource bundle and format it accordingly. A rough sketch of my code looks as follows:




            Answered 2022-Feb-03 at 10:12

            If I understood your question correctly....

            Below is example of exception handling in better way

            Microsoft Graph API - ERROR response - Example :

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70819069


            Vaadin-flow non-critical validation that still returns isValid=true
            Asked 2022-Jan-17 at 15:37

            we are currently trying to implement a non-critical validation layer that checks field inputs against certain validators without marking the form as "not valid", but rather as "out of specification" so that we can highlight the fields to the user. In particular we are talking about number ranges with lower and upper boundaries that should highlight the input fields as some sort of "out of specification" warning. The input itself is considered valid but "out of specifaction" while the user should still be able to save the data.

            Here's an example:

            • allowed input of any integer (validation), with an input specification of integers between 90 and 100 (specification).
            • input "abc" -> wrong input type -> error message, saving not allowed
            • input "95.1234" -> wrong input type -> error message, saving not allowed
            • input "85" -> correct input type, valid input, but out of specification -> warning message, saving still allowed
            • input "95" -> correct input type, valid input, in specification -> saving allowed

            This means the normal binder validation should still block the saving while the additional non-critical validation should just highlight it, but not block it.

            We are currently using the vaadin binder in vaadin version 14 and are using the features of converters and validators. Is there a possibility to add our layer to the vaadin binder so that it performs fluently with our current usage? Or do we have to build our own non-critical validation layer additionally to the normal vaadin binder usage? In an ideal world we would pin it after conversion and validation phase:

            1. field input
            2. type conversion
            3. critical validation
            4. non-critical validation
            5. input saving

            I hope my description is sufficient. If there are any questions, just let me know and I try to describe it a little bit more detailed. Thanks in advance.



            Answered 2022-Jan-17 at 15:37

            That's possible with errors that are not of type ErrorLevel.ERROR with a custom BinderValidationErrorHandler available since flow 14.7.

            See the PR that introduced it with an example https://github.com/vaadin/flow/pull/11384#issuecomment-879309037

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70743527


            Possible to have `validate` fail on not specified elements?
            Asked 2022-Jan-14 at 16:11

            The below returns success, even though obj contains an element that is not in the schema.


            Is it possible to have validate fail, when it sees elements that are not specified in the schema?

            Jest have this expect(obj1).toEqual(obj2).

            If Validate can't do it, what options do I then have to detect unwanted elements?



            Answered 2022-Jan-14 at 16:11

            Yes, there is a strict option on the Schema, from the documentation:


            A Schema defines the structure that objects should be validated against.

            • obj schema definition
            • opts options
              • opts.typecast

              • opts.strip

              • opts.strict

                Validation fails when object contains properties not defined in the schema (optional, default false)

            So you'll need something like:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70713289


            How can I ensure that an array of objects contains only one of a particular key with Joi?
            Asked 2022-Jan-12 at 16:29

            I have something like:



            Answered 2022-Jan-07 at 15:21

            You can use the Joi.array method and pass it only one key you would like the object to have

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70623285


            Why are custom validation messages causing my HTML form elements to stay invalid?
            Asked 2022-Jan-03 at 16:18

            I've implemented a custom validation message on my input for the pattern validation rule while leaving the default message for required as is. However, when I do so, once the input becomes invalid, it never becomes valid again, even though I am meeting the pattern criteria.



            Answered 2022-Jan-03 at 16:18

            First of all, per MDN:

            It's vital to set the message to an empty string if there are no errors. As long as the error message is not empty, the form will not pass validation and will not be submitted.

            This agrees with that the HTML standard says:

            Suffering from a custom error

            When a control's custom validity error message (as set by the element's setCustomValidity() method or ElementInternals's setValidity() method) is not the empty string.

            An element satisfies its constraints if it is not suffering from any of the above validity states.

            Your sample does not clear the custom error if the form field is determined to be valid. As such, once the field is determined invalid, it stays so for the remainder of the session.

            Moreover, you modify custom error only after the field has already been determined invalid. This means the form will still not be submitted even if you clear the message in the same handler.

            A better way too accomplish your goal would be to monitor the field in the change event handler for the field and set the custom message there:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70514086


            Return custom error message from struct tag validation
            Asked 2021-Nov-22 at 21:05

            I'm using Go 1.17 with Gin and I want to implement a struct validation before sending the data to my database. I took the example from Gin documentation.

            In the struct we can declare different tags to validate a field like this:



            Answered 2021-Nov-22 at 21:05

            Gin gonic uses the package github.com/go-playground/validator/v10 to perform binding validation. If the validation fails, the error returned is a validator.ValidationErrors.

            This is not mentioned explicitly but here in Model binding and validation it states:

            Gin uses go-playground/validator/v10 for validation. Check the full docs on tags usage here.

            That links to the go-playground/validator/v10 documentation, where you find the paragraph Validation Functions Return Type error.

            You can use the standard errors package to check if the error is that, unwrap it, and access the single fields, which are validator.FieldError. From that, you can construct whatever error message you want.

            Given an error model like this:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70069834


            How to use Antd InternalFormInstance to validate form without display of UI Errors
            Asked 2021-Oct-22 at 16:42

            I am trying to disable the form submit button until the validation is fully passed.

            I have come across the threads regarding this topic.

            This thread helps to trigger validation without display of UI errors: https://github.com/ant-design/ant-design/issues/25993

            The below code works within the hoc of my footer button wrapper, but it is verifying for all fields to be touched and even applicable for non-required fields, which is not right and expected.



            Answered 2021-Oct-06 at 16:24

            It looks like there is a bunch of bugs in existing Antd library for this validation and this is not supported unless they officially announce with a release. There are open tickets and none have addressed.

            I believe ill not find a solution for this question for now.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69379635

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network


            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install jquery-tinyvalidate

            You can install using 'npm i jquery-tinyvalidate' or download it from GitHub, npm.


            For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
          • npm

            npm i jquery-tinyvalidate

          • CLONE
          • HTTPS


          • CLI

            gh repo clone kswedberg/jquery-tinyvalidate

          • sshUrl


          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link

            Explore Related Topics

            Consider Popular Validation Libraries


            by validatorjs


            by sideway


            by jquense


            by jquery-validation


            by go-playground

            Try Top Libraries by kswedberg


            by kswedbergJavaScript


            by kswedbergJavaScript


            by kswedbergJavaScript


            by kswedbergJavaScript


            by kswedbergJavaScript