watchlist | Recursively watch a list of directories & run a command | Runtime Evironment library
kandi X-RAY | watchlist Summary
kandi X-RAY | watchlist Summary
Recursively watch a list of directories & run a command on any file system changes
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Watch files .
- Create directory structure .
- Watch directory files .
- check for changes
- Run the process
- Handle the callback
watchlist Key Features
watchlist Examples and Code Snippets
fastify.put("/:id", async (request, reply) => {
try {
const { id } = request.params;
const newCoin = request.body;
// get the user
let user = await User.findById(id);
// push the new
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on watchlist
QUESTION
I'm new to Gulp
and trying to automate some tasks. Here's my environment setup: npm version: 8.1.0
, node version 17.0.1
, gulp CLI version 2.3.0
and gulp version 4.0.2
And here's my gulpfile.js
:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-15 at 01:42gulp-imagemin 8.0.0 and above are now ESM only. You can downgrade gulp-imagemin to 7.1.0 which is commonjs and it should work fine.
This package is now pure ESM. Please read this.
https://github.com/sindresorhus/gulp-imagemin/releases/tag/v8.0.0
QUESTION
I have a React application (like Netflix) that displays movies thumbnails on the homepage.
When you click on a thumbnail, a modal window appears where you can click on a button to add the movie to your Watchlist. These movies will be saved in local storage and if you go to the component "Watchlist", you can see all the favorite movies displayed.
Here is the code that handles the click (this function is stored in the Context) (I don't use useState because a re-render would trigger a change in the background of the app):
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-12 at 07:25You're starting with an empty array:
QUESTION
My page when requested through GET appears already with error "This field is required.", which is not a desirable behavior. I want this error appears when user actually attempts to submit a form without a data required.
This is my form Python class:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-30 at 21:29There is an error in that your form has no method, so it defaults to GET. It should be
Now why are you getting errors even if the form is not being submitted?
This form = Place_A_Bid_Form({"listing":listing_obj.title})
creates a bound form, which will give the error since bid
is required and missing.
Perhaps what you intended is to create an unbound form with initial data, like this:
form = Place_A_Bid_Form(initial={"listing":listing_obj.title})
This will create the same looking form on your html, but since it's not bound, it will not give any errors, unless it is submitted with the missing bid
field.
Check out the docs on bound and unbound forms, and this answer about how to provide initial data to each.
QUESTION
Is it possible to change button text that is created using array. If it is possible, what should I do with the onClick function in the button. Here is the sample code :
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-26 at 05:40If you are rendering stuff based on props, it is not really necessary to use hooks in this case.
Something like this should work:
QUESTION
So I have a csv, and I am trying to load it into a dataframe via
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-28 at 23:19The separator is not separating the csv correctly, try leaving it out and letting the csv reader use the default value of ,
instead.
QUESTION
I have an array full of user data I'm mapping though to display its information, and I'd like to have a button for each watchlist that deletes that watchlist (the backend already works I tested the deleteWatchlist
function with the string value of an existing watchlist). My problem is that I get the name of the watchlist I need after mapping through the first array.
How do I set the state of the watchlistName for each watchlist?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-09 at 22:08You needn't use state for this in your dynamically rendered component on each iteration pass the current watchlist (i.watchlistName
) into the function as a parameter. To do this update your code as follows:
deleteWatchListNOTE: Also note that async functions in a syncronous context returns a promise.
QUESTION
I have this function:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-07 at 18:29The return value of the call of realloc is not stored in any variable
QUESTION
I have a class (WatchlistClass) that conforms to the "ObservableObject" protocol and that holds a @Published var (watchlist). The var, in turn, holds a whole array of stocks and some information ([StockInformation]), which is supposed to update my view (WatchlistView) with the current stock prices and stuff. That part works perfectly fine, but the class should access the @StateObject in the view to change the data. Accessing it directly in the class doesn't work because it doesn't read the data from the @StateObject. I tried to access the @StateObject in the view directly but that also creates a new instance of the class that has an empty array. Using "static" on a @Published var throws an error. I can't, for the life of me, figure out how to access a @StateObject directly inside the view to read and modify the data that it holds. Any help would be appreciated.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-06 at 04:23When using a singleton pattern, you usually want to declare init
on the object as private so you're sure you can only create one instance of it.
Then, to access that singleton version, you'll use WatchlistClass.shared
:
QUESTION
I'm trying to push data to a nested array in mongodb. I'm using mongoose as well.
This is just mock code to see if i can get it working:
User model:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-02 at 17:16It's not perfect but you could get the user document, update the user's watchlist, and then save the updated watchlist like so:
QUESTION
I am trying to understand the exact difference in terms of how the re-render of function component is caused in one case using plain setState V/s other case which uses functional state update
The relevant code snippet is as below
Case 1 : Causes re-render of the component
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-24 at 07:39Using a functional state update or not is rather irrelevant to the question you are asking about. You appear to be asking why (1) a callback with dependency triggers a rerender versus (2) a callback with empty dependency.
The answer is quite literally very simple. In version (2) you are providing a stable callback reference from the time the component mounts that never changes, whereas in (1) the callback reference changes when the dependency does. Remember that React components rerender when state or props update (a new callback reference is a new prop reference) or when the parent component rerenders. Since the onRemove
prop is updating in (1) it triggers a rerender.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install watchlist
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page