grow | JavaScript L-system implementation | Frontend Framework library
kandi X-RAY | grow Summary
kandi X-RAY | grow Summary
Grow.js is a simple javascript implementation of a [Lindenmayer System] based on the book [The Algorithmic Beauty of Plants] About two chapters into reading this, I got so excited about it I had to try building my own simulator.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of grow
grow Key Features
grow Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on grow
QUESTION
I have a schema with many large tables which all have the same structure. Each table has an index on its id. I also have a separate table with all the id's across the other tables, pointing to their tablename; for example, the tables in the schema:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-15 at 19:08You are looking for table partitioning:
QUESTION
A part of my form contains QGroupBox
(Status Box
) with 4 child QGroupBox
es arranged in a grid layout (2x2). Two bottom QGroupBox
es (Widget 1 Box
and Widget 2 Box
) contain widgets of fixed size (with set minimumSize
and maximumSize
) so they're non-resizable at all in both directions. Because of that rigid size constraints top row of QGroupBox
es (Summary Box
and Helper Box
) can only be resized in vertical direction.
And here comes the troublesome part. Top-left QGroupBox
(Summary Box
) have grid layout 5x3 while top-right (Helper Box
) have vertical layout with 6 rows. If I have naive widget placement as shown on picture 1 Qt is enlarging vertical size of both labels in top row to make height of both QGroupBox
es equal (see red arrows on picture 1).
This is definitely that I don't want so I've added vertical spacer to the bottom of Summary Box
and from the first glance it worked (picture 2). But only from the first glance... What you see is the minimum height of my whole form and the bottom side of spacer and last QCheckBox
in the Helper Box
seems to be aligned.
If I'm expanding my form vertically this spacer grows a bit and that causes the increase of height of both top QGroupBox
es. As a result spacing between QCheckBox
es increases too and we can also see that top and bottom spacing are unequal for the top-right box (see red arrows on picture 3).
I've tried to play with sizeType
for my vertical spacer. If I set it to Minimum
or MinimumExpanding
then the spacer doesn't grow on resize (and doesn't shrink, too) but it appears to be expanded to the size as on picture 3 (corrupting spacings between QCheckBox
es too). If I set it to Maximum
, Preferred
or Expanding
then I observe the same behavior as described above for picture 3.
What is the proper way to achieve alignment for two QGroupBox
es in a row of grid without affecting spacing between elements (e. g. in that case make vertical spacer to fit only single row of grid layout and never expand/shrink)?
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-15 at 17:18Items will be aligned if both QGroupBox
es have same count of children and each row have at least one child with Expanding
vertical policy. Instead of spacer use QWidget
I removed unrelated widgets and reduces number of rows to 4 for demonstration purposes (less xml).
QUESTION
I am trying to change the property of a CSS class on click on a button. Firstly i have this button in my html
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-15 at 12:07Here is a minimal JS fiddle example: HTML:
QUESTION
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-14 at 19:20Try with this styling
QUESTION
Here is my question, i will list them to make it clear:
- I am writing a program drawing squares in 2D using instancing.
- My camera direction is (0,0,-1), camera up is (0,1,0), camera position is (0,0,3), and the camera position changes when i press some keys.
- What I want is that, when I zoom in (the camera moves closer to the square), the square's size(in the screen) won't change. So in my shader:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-14 at 21:58Sounds like you use a perspective projection, and the formula you use in steps 1 and 2 won't work because VP * vec4 will in the general case result in a vec4(x,y,z,w)
with the w
value != 1
, and adding a vec4(a,b,0,0)
to that will just get you vec3( (x+a)/w, (y+b)/w, z)
after the perspective divide, while you seem to want vec3(x/w + a, y/w +b, z)
. So the correct approach is to scale a
and b
by w
and add that before the divde: vec4(x+a*w, y+b*w, z, w)
.
Note that when you move your camera closer to the geometry, the effective w
value will approach towards zero, so (x+a)/w
will be a greater than x/w + a
, resulting in your geometry getting bigger.
QUESTION
I want the ScrollViewer to do only one thing - allow me to scroll. I don't want it to allow its Content to grow. Yet it does. How to prevent that?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-14 at 21:56You would avoid stretching the Image by setting its Stretch
property to None
.
QUESTION
I have box elements in a flex container. I want the paragraph in a box to display when hovering over the box. However, the hovered box makes the other boxes grow too. Is there a way to avoid affecting the other boxes when hovering one box?
I would try: align-items:flex-start, but I want the boxes to be equivalent in height when they are not hovered.
So align-items:flex-start does not keep the boxes' height equivalent when they are not hovered.
I want the box to enlarge when hovered without affecting the other boxes and turn back to the equivalent height when not hovered.
Codepen link: https://codepen.io/lemour-sudo/pen/yLMQOpE
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-13 at 11:42Apply align-items
property so that flex children doesn't stretch:
QUESTION
I was writing a simple loop in C++ and was wondering what the time complexity would be.
My intuition tells me that it is O(n*log(n))
but I couldn't come up for a proof for the n*log(n)
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-14 at 14:10Worst case is when the input has only unique numbers. In that case, the equivalent is:
QUESTION
I found this answer posted here earlier.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-14 at 13:36function updateForm() {
var locationForm = form.getItemById("413015265").asListItem();
var equipmentForm = form.getItemById("2123556695").asListItem();
var newLocation = form.getItemById('231469190').asPageBreakItem();
var newItem = form.getItemById('90044295').asPageBreakItem();
var gotoIssue = form.getItemById('1493817332').asPageBreakItem();
var gotoLocation = form.getItemById('1425783734').asPageBreakItem();
var locations = tblLocations.getRange(2,2,tblLocations.getLastRow()-1,1).getValues();
var items = tblItems.getRange(2,2,tblItems.getLastRow()-1,1).getValues();
var locationChoices = [];
var itemChoices = [];
locationChoices[0] = locationForm.createChoice("** Add Location **",newLocation);
itemChoices[0] = equipmentForm.createChoice("** Add Item **",newItem);
items = items.sort();
locations = locations.sort();
for (var i=0;i
QUESTION
There is a Java 11 (SpringBoot 2.5.1) application with simple workflow:
- Upload archives (as multipart files with size 50-100 Mb each)
- Unpack them in memory
- Send each unpacked file as a message to a queue via JMS
When I run the app locally java -jar app.jar
its memory usage (in VisualVM) looks like a saw: high peaks (~ 400 Mb) over a stable baseline (~ 100 Mb).
When I run the same app in a Docker container memory consumption grows up to 700 Mb and higher until an OutOfMemoryError. It appears that GC does not work at all. Even when memory options are present (java -Xms400m -Xmx400m -jar app.jar
) the container seems to completely ignore them still consuming much more memory.
So the behavior in the container and in OS are dramatically different.
I tried this Docker image in DockerDesktop Windows 10
and in OpenShift 4.6
and got two similar pictures for the memory usage.
Dockerfile
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-13 at 03:31In Java 11, you can find out the flags that have been passed to the JVM and the "ergonomic" ones that have been set by the JVM by adding -XX:+PrintCommandLineFlags
to the JVM options.
That should tell you if the container you are using is overriding the flags you have given.
Having said that, its is (IMO) unlikely that the container is what is overriding the parameters.
It is not unusual for a JVM to use more memory that the -Xmx
option says. The explanation is that that option only controls the size of the Java heap. A JVM consumes a lot of memory that is not part of the Java heap; e.g. the executable and native libraries, the native heap, metaspace, off-heap memory allocations, stack frames, mapped files, and so on. Depending on your application, this could easily exceed 300MB.
Secondly, OOMEs are not necessarily caused by running out of heap space. Check what the "reason" string says.
Finally, this could be a difference in your app's memory utilization in a containerized environment versus when you run it locally.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install grow
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page