login-flow | : key : A login/register flow built with React & Redux | Frontend Framework library
kandi X-RAY | login-flow Summary
kandi X-RAY | login-flow Summary
This application demonstrates what a React.js based register/login workflow might look like on the Frontend. I used my react-boilerplate as a starting point — the app thus uses Redux, PostCSS, react-router, ServiceWorker, AppCache, bcrypt and lots more. The default username is AzureDiamond and the default password is hunter2, but feel free to register new users! The registered users are saved to localStorage, so they'll persist across page reloads.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Login a user .
- Register a new user
- Checks to see if the next route is authorized
- reducer to redraw
- set error message
- An indicator in loading state .
- Logout handler .
- Check if an array contains any elements .
- Button containing loading indicator .
- select the given data
login-flow Key Features
login-flow Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on login-flow
QUESTION
I am trying to connect my Metamask wallet to my Java Spring-Boot backend. I was trying to follow the example here. I am able to autogenerate the nonce and receive the wallet ID without a problem. I am trying to verify the signed nonce from the Wallet on the server to make sure that the sender is indeed who they say they are. However, I am unable to find any documentation on Web3J to do this.
Is web3j not the right package to use for this? The example shows how to do the verification on NodeJS based on javascript but I don't find any example on how to do this on Java.
My understanding is that the public key is the wallet ID itself and that the message is the nonce signed by the private key of the wallet which is not shared for obvious reasons. According to this, I would need to "decrypt" the message using the public key and see if the decrypted message is same as the nonce that the backend sent to Metamask to sign. Is this correct?
Here is my code to create and send the nonce to UI:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Apr-03 at 03:03I was able to figure this out finally. My initial understanding was incorrect. I was not supposed to attempt to decrypt the message to retrieve the nonce. Rather I needed to use the nonce to see if I can retrieve the public key of the private key used to sign the message and see if that public key retrieved matches the wallet ID.
The algorithm:- Receive the signed message and the wallet ID from the client
- Retrieve the nonce sent to the client with the same wallet ID
- Generate the hash of the nonce
- Generate the signature data from the message. This basically retrieves the V, R and S and. R and S are the outputs of the ECDSA Signature and V is the Recovery ID.
- Using the ECDSA Signature and Hash of the Nonce, generate the possible public Key that was used to sign the message. At max, one will be able to generate 4 possible public keys for this message.
- Check if any of the generated keys match public wallet ID that the client sent. If it matches, then we have a positive match. Generate the JWT and respond to the client. If not, we know that the nonce was not signed by the Metamask wallet we expected.
Here is a sample code for UI (JavaScript and HTML):
QUESTION
Last night Facebook disabled our app with the following justificative:
Developer Policy 6.1: Verify that you have integrated Login correctly. Your app shouldn't crash or hang during the testing process.
During Login, your app is crashing or hanging excessively, creating a broken experience for people trying to use your app. To make sure this flow runs smoothly, check that you've integrated Facebook Login correctly. We recommend that you test Login on all integrations. If you have not already done so, please:
• Here's our quickstart guide for implementing Facebook Login for Android: https://developers.facebook.com/docs/facebook-login/android • We encourage you to test your Login integration following these steps here: https://developers.facebook.com/docs/facebook-login/testing-your-login-flow/ • Best Practices for Login can be found here: https://developers.facebook.com/docs/facebook-login/best-practices
After going through the app options for Facebook Login, I found out that our public_profile
permission is in "Standard Access." To allow our users to use Facebook Login, I will need to upgrade to "Advanced Access."
The documentation says that "Business apps created before February 16, 2021, were automatically approved for Advanced Access for the email and public_profile." I should be able to move our public_profile
permission to "Advanced Access" because our app was created way before 2021. The problem is that after I click on the "Get Advanced Access" button and type my password, the page reloads, and the public_profile
permission is still on the "Standard Access" mode.
So, these are my questions: what I am doing wrong? Is my app unable to upgrade our permissions to "Advanced Access" while being in this "Disabled" state? How can I debug my app to make it work again?
Some additional info about my app:
- It passed through the Facebook App Review in 2019, and we already got permission to manage Pages and read connected Instagram accounts;
- Everything was working fine until Facebook warned us that our Login integration was not working correctly;
- In response to the Facebook notification and before Facebook disabled our app, we enabled the "Login with the JavaScript SDK" and updated the "Allowed Domains for the JavaScript SDK" (such as "https://www.example.com/").
- I can't switch back our app to "Dev Mode" because the option is not showing up (is it due to being "Disabled"?)
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-16 at 13:34I discovered that it is not possible to modify your permission settings while your app is blocked.
I recovered my app using the appeal form, saying that I can't correct it while it is blocked because I need to change the permission settings.
QUESTION
Trying to refresh my long lived access token via this endpoint:
Keep getting the error: OAuth "Facebook Platform" "invalid_token" "Invalid OAuth access token."
However, I debug my token using https://developers.facebook.com/tools/debug/accesstoken/ which shows that it is valid and for around 2 months (which proves its a long lived access token).
Does this endpoint not work anymore or am I missing something?
P.S. I'm using a User Access Token, its a public Instagram business account backed by a Facebook page. Also, I'm using this on server, so it won't refresh if the token is used within 60 days (that's what happens when you auth through FB mobile sdk).
EDIT
So it looks like there are two requirements that I missed:
- Your long lived access token has to be at least 24 hours old in order to refresh
- You need the 'instagram_graph_user_profile' permission/scope when logging your user into Facebook
HOWEVER
I tried:
- Oddly enough, whenever I add that permission/scope to the list, Facebook Login always fails and says "There's something wrong". I tried this using the facebook login react npm package, the manual login flow by just making requests, and the FB SDK login button, all the same result.
- The Facebook Graph API Explorer doesn't include this permission. However, the list of permissions they have does include it.
So what does this mean, Facebook isn't allowing refresh of long lived tokens?
NOTE: The docs on how to refresh a long lived access token are for the Basic Display API, which isn't recommended for business accounts (which is who will be using my app). So this makes me more unsure of if it is possible to refresh tokens for the Instagram Graph API.
MORE INFO
So on the FB developer portal, if you add the Instagram Basic Display product to your app (I previously didn't have it) it allows you to ask for the instagram_graph_user_profile
permission. However, this brings up more questions:
- Do I have to use Insta Graph API + Insta Basic Display in order to get a a refreshable long lived access token?
- If so, how does that work? Because Insta Basic Display is recommended for personal accounts and Graph API is for business accounts.
- If so, how do I add the
instagram_graph_user_profile
permission? It still causes FB login to fail.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-03 at 00:46So I ended up contacting a few companies that I know for a fact do what I was trying to do and they confirmed that Facebook does REQUIRE the user to re-authorize after ~60 days.
If they don't, the long lived access token will expire.
QUESTION
I've got an issue with a new Keycloak installation that I'm working on.
I've got a PHP-based app which authenticates users via Keycloak. This works fine as long as I use local users (users stored in the Keycloak-realm).
I want the users to be able to authenticate through an external IdP though. To achieve this, I've added this OIDC-IdP through the Keycloak Admin interface.
Everything works fine the first time a user logs in. If the user logs out and reattempts a login, Keycloak shows an error page: "We are sorry... Invalid username or password."
The logging at this point shows the following:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jan-29 at 06:59As already stated in the comments of the original post, I've found the solution and it had nothing to do with Keycloak.
My IdP gives the option to switch between transient and persistent sub-claims in the OIDC-token. I had it set on transient, which means that the OIDC-token will have a different claim each time the user logs in.
If that's the case, Keycloak looks at the email address in the token to determine whether the user already exists and gives the user the option to merge both accounts (if you use the default First Broker Login-flow). This will then happen each time the user gets a new transient ID in the token (each new login for my IdP).
I've switched the IdP to use persistent ID's, so users now have the same ID in each token they provide. This allows Keycloak to not only see a matching email address in the user table, but also a valid IdP link for that specific ID, thus allowing the user to immediately log in without merging, as it now knows the ID's match and the token is for the same user.
QUESTION
Please do not mark this as duplicate, I have read these SO question already but still, it is not working navigation component popUpTo bug Android navigation component popUpTo behaviour Android Navigation Component + Login Flow + Nested BottomNavigationView
I am using
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-May-08 at 16:51You're using the wrong id in your popUpTo
As per the popUpTo guide:
app:popUpTo
tells the Navigation library to pop some destinations off of the back stack as part of the call tonavigate()
. The attribute value is the ID of the most recent destination that should remain on the stack.You can also include
app:popUpToInclusive="true"
to indicate that the destination specified inapp:popUpTo
should also be removed from the back stack.
The popUpTo
should point to the destination that is already on the back stack that you want to pop off the back stack. Therefore if you want to pop everything up to the splashFragment
, you should use app:popUpTo="@id/splashFragment"
. If you want to pop everything up to and including the splashFragment
, then you should use app:popUpTo="@id/splashFragment"
and app:popUpToInclusive="true"
:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install login-flow
Clone this repo using git clone git@github.com:mxstbr/login-flow.
Run npm install to install the dependencies.
Run npm start to start the local web server.
Go to http://localhost:3000 and you should see the app running!
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page