server-components | lightweight tool for composable HTML rendering | Frontend Framework library
kandi X-RAY | server-components Summary
kandi X-RAY | server-components Summary
Server Components are a simple, lightweight tool for composable HTML rendering in Node.js, broadly following the web components browser specification, but on the server side. Server Components let you build web pages from , and , in an accessible, incredibly-fast and SEO-loving way, without zero front-end cost or complexity. Composable flexible and powerful approaches to building web applications don't have to require heavyweight front-end JS frameworks, buildsteps, pre-compilers, and enormous downloads. You can take the same ideas (and standards), apply them directly server side, to gain all that power without any of the page weight, without having to maintain all the complexity, and without breaking accessibility/SEO/client-side performance. Even better, you move all your logic into your server-side JS engine: browser discrepancies disappear, testing gets vastly easier, and you can use every JS feature your Node version supports natively, right now. Server Components is still in its very early stages, and subject to change! The core functionality is in place and working though, and it's stable and ready to play with whenever you are.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of server-components
server-components Key Features
server-components Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on server-components
QUESTION
As in RSC the React code will be on the server-side for various reasons mentioned HERE
I wonder if there is a way we can leverage the lifecycle and fetching APIs after the mounting point (For example update Or useEffects).
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-02 at 19:53No.
Server Components: As a general rule, Server Components run once per request on the server, so they don’t have state and can’t use features that only exist on the client. Specifically, Server Components:
- ❌ May not use state, because they execute (conceptually) only once per request, on the server. So useState() and useReducer() are not supported.
- ❌ May not use rendering lifecycle (effects). So useEffect() and useLayoutEffect() are not supported.
- ❌ May not use browser-only APIs such as the DOM (unless you polyfill them on the server).
- ❌ May not use custom hooks that depend on state or effects, or utility functions that depend on browser-only APIs.
- ✅ May use server-only data sources such as databases, internal (micro)services, filesystems, etc.
- ✅ May render other Server Components, native elements (div, span, etc), or Client Components.
Server Hooks/Utilities: Developers may also create custom hooks or utility libraries that are designed for the server. All of the rules for Server Components apply. For example, one use-case for server hooks is to provide helpers for accessing server-side data sources.
QUESTION
I've been struggling bringing OneNote to the foreground using OLE automation. When I run the following code, OneNote loads in the background and I'm not able to bring it to the foreground. I haven't had any problems trying to launch and bring Word, Excel, PowerPoint and Edge to the foreground, however OneNote behaves different. There is very little info about OneNote being automated using OLE and some pages are not longer exist.
Any help would be appreciated. You can download the Onenote14-x86.h file from here
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Oct-28 at 06:49You can create a new windows with this call
QUESTION
What's the proper workflow in cases when you have an error after you restart/reload your app using mount?
An example:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Apr-29 at 16:50Here's the workaround that seems to work in case of an error:
- the content of a fixed file need to be sent to the REPL
- switch back to
user
namespace - send the content of your
user
namespace to the REPL - there is no 4 - you just got your REPL back.
At this point you can use your regular (start)
, (stop)
, (restart)
.
QUESTION
This isn't a specific problem question but a "cry for help". My problem is this. Our organization is in the process of implementing Office365. Until now there were tens of applications with their own authentication and authorization but in the process most of them will be rewritten to use within O365 environment.
We are facing the problem of creating one endpoint (ASP.NET WebAPI app) which will be used to authenticate a user with his credentials from Active Directory (or B2B AD on Azure because some apps are used outside) and tell if this user is allowed to use app that asked to log him.
I'm just wondering through documentations and sample code but can't decide what will be a good practice in this scenario. Should we just build each app and use Azure Active Directory provider to authenticate. Or is it possible to setup ONE api that will hold all apps Ids and its userIds - then it will check user credentials against AD and give app token/cookie...
My best bet is to try this: http://www.tugberkugurlu.com/archive/simple-oauth-server-implementing-a-simple-oauth-server-with-katana-oauth-authorization-server-components-part-1 But create Provider for AzureAD. But then its still question about this B2B AD part.
Please help by pointing to some up to date resources..
...ANSWER
Answered 2017-May-15 at 10:00You are getting this backwards. If you have apps integrated with Azure AD you don't have to create endpoint which will validate users right to use apps but you are assigning right to use an app in Azure AD. This is whole point.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install server-components
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page