atomize | Design System for developers | User Interface library

 by   proksh JavaScript Version: Current License: Non-SPDX

kandi X-RAY | atomize Summary

kandi X-RAY | atomize Summary

atomize is a JavaScript library typically used in User Interface, React applications. atomize has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities and it has medium support. However atomize has a Non-SPDX License. You can download it from GitHub.

UI Design System for React JS.
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              atomize has a medium active ecosystem.
              It has 1621 star(s) with 278 fork(s). There are 30 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 6 months.
              There are 20 open issues and 20 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 20 days. There are 14 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of atomize is current.

            kandi-Quality Quality

              atomize has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

            kandi-Security Security

              atomize has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.
              atomize code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.
              There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

            kandi-License License

              atomize has a Non-SPDX License.
              Non-SPDX licenses can be open source with a non SPDX compliant license, or non open source licenses, and you need to review them closely before use.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              atomize releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.
              Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi has reviewed atomize and discovered the below as its top functions. This is intended to give you an instant insight into atomize implemented functionality, and help decide if they suit your requirements.
            • Recursively merge objects
            • Opens an object to another
            • Scroll the window to the animation
            • Evaluate ease in case
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            atomize Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for atomize.

            atomize Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for atomize.

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            Datatype Map: Extract several atomic values
            Asked 2021-May-23 at 05:48

            I am looking to see if "parse-json" can be an option to "json-to-xml" when comes to extracting data from parsed JSON and if "parse-json" can extract more then 1 value, utlizing a "for-each" loop.

            JSON file:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-May-22 at 13:36

            A hierarchic structure like nested objects or nested maps are usually not processed by a single for-each or apply-templates, you need recursion to hande arbitrary nesting. Or a clear desciption on how to serialize a nested map to a single attribute value.

            Of course in the case of XPath navigation using e.g. // or descendant you can easily process and flatten a hierarchy. There is no similar downwards selection through the hierarchy of XDM maps; it can be implemented however using map:for-each and recursion.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67649857

            QUESTION

            Database design — how granular do I need to be?
            Asked 2021-Mar-14 at 11:57

            I work in the publishing industry and I’m designing a mysql database to help me manage contracts. I have a set of core data tables – information about Authors, their respective Titles and Publishers – which I want to weave together to create contracts.

            I’m new to mysql but I have been taking online courses, so I have a general grasp of data normalization. I’m having trouble on deciding how to design my contracts table.

            Information about the scope of data:

            • I’m working with approximately 500 authors, 1500 titles and 800 publishers. These numbers will not increase dramatically.
            • There are 3k+ contracts and likely 200 to be added per year

            Information about business rules:

            • Only one author/publisher per contract
            • One contract can have multiple titles

            What it’s for:

            • A simple CRUD using php/html where I can add authors/titles/publishers and create new contracts.

            My question is: How granular / atomized does my contract table need to be? What are the advantages/disadvantages?

            I have worked on two solutions (see below). Based on what I know, option 1 is the most logical since I only need a many-to-many relationship between titles and contracts, but I have also read that it isn’t good practice to create a ‘main’ table since this doesn’t utilize the inherent relationality of mysql.

            Option 1 — one large contracts table

            • Here I’ve opted to relate the contracts to the authors and publishers by inserting foreign keys (FK) that connect to the respective primary keys (PK).

            Option 2 — granular contracts tables

            • Here I’ve opted to relate the contracts to the authors and publisher by way of the contract PK. Thus, the guiding principle here is the contract PK and not author/publisher PK.

            Click here for an ERD of both options

            Thanks beforehand for any help or pointers!

            Cheers

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Jan-25 at 15:51

            Option 1 would only allow 1 author and 1 publisher per contract where as option 2 allows multiple authors and or publishers per contract. Clearly option 2 is more flexible, but do you need it?

            If you don't need multiple authors or publishers per contract for the foreseeable future, then I would opt for option 1, otherwise go for option 2.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65887737

            QUESTION

            GoogleSheet Facing Formatting Issues while Sending Email of Range copied to Email Body
            Asked 2021-Mar-11 at 21:19

            I am working on a atomized email report pasted in Gmail body and sending emails. All things working good expect the format on email Body is showing like Image 1.

            Last column is only the time gap difference which is formatted on Google Sheet as Duration - HH:MM:SS

            How data is Being reflected in Email body:

            Actual Image from Google Sheet - From where Email is being Generated:

            Script for Sending emails & Fetching data:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Mar-11 at 21:19

            QUESTION

            XSD to assert equality of attributes against nested elements?
            Asked 2020-Oct-29 at 15:21

            I am trying to add an assertion to a XSD (1.1) schema that will check an element's attribute for equality against its children element's value.

            I have the following XML:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Oct-29 at 15:19

            The Car/Maker XPath in your xs:assert is selecting multiple elements, which cannot be compared directly against an attribute value, @Maker.

            To fix, change your xs:assert from

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64593524

            QUESTION

            Extension optional Array with Optional Element. Is it even possible?
            Asked 2020-Jun-24 at 20:43

            I have a protocol FooProtocol. and a class Bar. Inside a class an Array var mess: [Foo?]? to keep [foo1, foo2, nil, foo3...] or nil And I try to make extension for this array to count new Foo object. I prefer to have protocols, because Foos could be very different objects delivered from outer world.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Jun-24 at 13:06

            From my understanding, it should work as you did, but one never knows what happens in the swift compiler world (and especially it's error messages).

            Anyway, you can circumvent digging deeper into Wrapped.Element.Wrapped by specifyig the Wrapped.Element more precisely to be an Optional:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/62555320

            QUESTION

            Python Nested Dictionaries Retrieve Key from nested value
            Asked 2020-Jun-14 at 05:55

            I have a Python dictionary with dictionaries nested heavily within. There are several tiers.

            What I am trying to accomplish is a function where I can enter any one of the "subcategories" values, for example, 20003482 or 200000879 and it has to return the first nested subcategory key, so for the above examples, 100003109

            I am unsure about the best way to go about this, but I've tried something like

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Jun-11 at 23:54

            There could be 2 different solutions. The simpler one would be here you know that the subcategories are at a fixed depth, in this case

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/62333686

            QUESTION

            Saxon 9, Java, NullPointer from doc-available
            Asked 2020-Mar-13 at 23:43

            This is an error seen after fixing the issue in Saxon 9 HE, Java - Static errors, XTSE0210, XTSE0165, XPST0017

            When invoking an XSLT transform from the following java code

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Mar-13 at 23:43

            What does the ClasspathResourceURIResolver return when asked to resolve the URI input:request? It seems to have returned a source object that takes Saxon into the code path

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/60675550

            QUESTION

            Part wise Gram-Schmidt-Scheme on a large set of Vectors
            Asked 2020-Feb-28 at 17:17

            In a Simulation i create a large set of vectors on which i apply the Gram-Schmidt scheme part wise. By part wise i mean, that i first remove the components of the vectors and then compute its length (check orth_2 or orth_3 formulas in the code below). The length is then stored to compute later a desired value (l-values, see code below). Only after that i normalize the vector.

            The above explained procedure is shown in the following code for three vectors:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Feb-28 at 17:17

            There is a quite simple solution, apply the QR decomposition that is already present in numpy.linalg (or scipy.linalg)

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/60352662

            QUESTION

            Retrieve XPath result in Saxonica with XML tag
            Asked 2020-Feb-06 at 14:14

            I am trying to query an XML file using miscellaneous xpaths with Saxonica API from net.sf.saxon but it seems that every time the query operations return results without xml tags - only the content. Is there a way to do this (straight-forward or work-around)?

            To be more explicit:

            For the xml file

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Feb-06 at 14:14

            The XPath expression returns a node; what you do with the node is then up to the calling application code. If you call node.getStringValue(), you will get the string value as defined in the XPath spec (that is, the same as calling fn:string() on the node within XPath). Similarly, the atomize() method follows the XPath spec for atomization (equivalent to fn:data() applied to the node.)

            If you want the node to be serialized as lexical XML, there are various ways of achieving it. If you were to use Saxon's s9api interface instead of the JAXP interface, I would recommend XdmNode.toString(). Using the JAXP interface and then casting to internal Saxon classes gives you the worst of both worlds: you get all the problems of JAXP (e.g. weak typing, no XPath 2.0 support) with none of the benefits (portability across implementations). But if you prefer to do it this way, then the simplest way to serialize Saxon nodes is probably the static method QueryResult.serialize(NodeInfo). The 3-argument version of the method gives you full control over serialization properties such as indentation and adding an XML declaration.

            With XPath 3.1 you can also invoke serialization within the XPath expression itself by calling fn:serialize(); this would avoid having to use any Saxon-specific classes and methods in the Java code.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/60094474

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install atomize

            You can download it from GitHub.

            Support

            IE9, IE10, IE11, Edge.
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
            CLONE
          • HTTPS

            https://github.com/proksh/atomize.git

          • CLI

            gh repo clone proksh/atomize

          • sshUrl

            git@github.com:proksh/atomize.git

          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link