ramda-fantasy | Land compatible types for easy integration | Functional Programming library
kandi X-RAY | ramda-fantasy Summary
kandi X-RAY | ramda-fantasy Summary
[Fantasy Land][1] compatible types for easy integration with [Ramda][2].
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- A class representation of a T .
- PUBLIC CONSTRUCTOR This constructor creates a new instance of Tuple .
- reduce reducer to a value
- PUBLIC CONSTRUCTORS This constructor creates a new left or right .
- Reduce an array .
- Middleware function .
- Work with the resolution .
- Ensures that the concatenation is done
- Represents a identity .
- Creates a new state object .
ramda-fantasy Key Features
ramda-fantasy Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on ramda-fantasy
QUESTION
Recently I have decided to switch from lodash to ramda to play with functional way of composing my logic. I love it! After some extensive digging into FP I have found that's it's not only about handy pure/point free utilities (ramda), but more about complex (at least for me) math abstractions (fantasy-land). I don't get all of it, but Either and Task pattern looks very handy. Problem is that I am not sure how to merge it with ramda utilities. I know about ramda-fantasy, but it's no longer maintained. Ramda-fantasy suggested libraries doesn't work the same way as ramda-fantasy. With all this new information about Monads/Monoids/Functors types I am completely lost.
For example, what the convention for this?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jul-16 at 13:15One way to think about it is to think about types versus functions.
Ramda offers a large collection of utility functions. They operate on arrays, on objects, on functions, on strings, on numbers, etc. But they also operate on user-defined types. So in your example, R.map
operates on anything which matches the Functor specification. If the implementation of Either
you use matches that specification, then Ramda's map
will operate on it.
But Ramda does not supply types. It works with the built-in types such as Object, Array, Function, etc. But -- arguably outside Lens
-- it does not supply any types of its own. Libraries such as Folktale provide large collections of types, such as Maybe
, Result
, Validation
, Task
and Future
; more dedicated ones such as Fluture provide powerful versions of one specific type (Future
). All of these types implement the Functor specification. A very incomplete list of such implementations is supplied by FantasyLand.
These two notions, functions on an abstract type and collections of types are complementary. A Ramda function which works on any functor will work on whatever version of Either you use (so long as it matches the specification.) More on this relationship is in this StackOverflow Q+A.
The question compared these two snippets:
QUESTION
There is a given function, that is fixed and must not be changed:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Oct-16 at 18:49Note: Ramda Fantasy is no longer maintained. The team recommends that you use other implementations of these concepts.
But we can still answer this question, as it's likely to be true of any reasonable Maybe
implementation
Basically, that's not how Maybe is designed to work. The idea is that you can have a Just holding absolutely any value. That includes the values null
and undefined
.
Ramda added a convenience constructor, Maybe (val)
, which turns into Just (val)
if val is not a nil value, and into Nothing ()
if it is. But that doesn't mean that you cannot create a Just (null)
. The main construction technique is to use the static Maybe .of
. And you can note that
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install ramda-fantasy
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page