remount | Mount React components to the DOM using custom elements | Frontend Framework library
kandi X-RAY | remount Summary
kandi X-RAY | remount Summary
Use your React components anywhere in your HTML as web components (custom elements). Demo Docs 2kb gzip'd · No dependencies · IE support.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of remount
remount Key Features
remount Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on remount
QUESTION
My main intention is to rewrite the Switch component, and then realize the caching of the component through the display, instead of destroying it every time.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-15 at 07:03You just need to mount the directly.
QUESTION
I have a component FancySpanComponent:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-14 at 10:52Try this approach. The HoC approach you were trying seems incorrect.
You have to return a class from inside the function. So that it could be uses like a React Component.
QUESTION
I am running Android emulator (emulator version 30.5.5.0) and the avd: Pixel_3a_API_30_x86
from AndroidStudio.
Using adb.exe
(Android Debug Bridge) I try to copy a file from the Windows host to the emulated Android /system/...
folder, but I haven't been able to after trying different things like this tutorial:
- I run the android emulator from the command line to specify the parameter
-writable-system
:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-10 at 06:03Run adb root && adb remount
first.
QUESTION
Do you know of a reliable way to induce a "Transport endpoint is not connected" trouble state in S3FS?
Yes, I know that S3FS is dodgy and that S3 is not meant for mounting as a normal file system. I realize there are other, better solutions than S3FS. I have read the other threads on SO and I'm not interested in re-hashing recommended alternatives at the moment. Some day, I may consider other alternatives, but I have a deadline and I want to stick to the topic.
I plan to try out things like autofs and cron-triggered remounting scripts and I want to be fairly sure that I'm testing potential solutions against as faithful a reproduction case as I can muster.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-28 at 01:45"Transport endpoint is not connected" means that the s3fs process exited without unmounting cleanly. Usually this is due to s3fs crashing, e.g., segmentation fault, memory corruption, etc. It should not occur under normal operation but you can simulate it by sending a signal to s3fs: kill -s SEGV $(pidof s3fs)
.
Newer versions of s3fs (1.89 as of this writing) address many of the previously-reported crashes. If you encounter one with the latest version, please re-run the s3fs with gdb attached and report the backtrace to the s3fs GitHub issue tracker so we can fix the root cause.
QUESTION
We have mounted a folder in a Linux machine to our docker container application using (docker-compose) volumes: - /mnt/share:/mnt/share
The /mnt/share is a mounted folder in the machine(Not a real folder in the machine, its our file server). IF for some reason that mount is lost and then remounted again. The application running in the docker container is not having access to the mounted folder until the container is restarted.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-14 at 00:56You might want to use to use a Volume Driver instead of bind-mounting a local filesystem. See Share data among machines
Without knowing more about your environment it is impossible to give a more detailed answer. It would be helpful to know if your container runs in a AWS data center or if you use nfsv3, nfsv4 or cifs for mounting.
QUESTION
This was originally a question about why I couldn't download anything to my displaced Downloads folder. The issue solved itself after rebooting the computer a second time (no idea why). I decided to leave it here anyway since it contains useful information to people who want to redirect their files on a mounted volume.
EDIT 2 :I was right at first, there was indeed an issue with my dual boot. The problem was that sometimes, I couldn't write anything on my NTFS partition when I was booted on Ubuntu. The reason for that was that Windows hadn't properly disconnected from the partition. More info about that issue here, but basically it happens when Windows isn't completely turned off before Ubuntu starts. The quick fix is to remove the Windows log file : $ sudo ntfsfix /dev/your-NTFS-partition
(for me it was : $ sudo ntfsfix /dev/sda4
). Then you simply unmount and remount the NTFS volume and you should be able to write in it, no reboot needed.
I made my first dual boot yesterday, following this tutorial. I partitioned my drive in 3 volumes, 1 for Windows 10, 1 for Ubuntu 20.04, and 1 for my files (named Storage), that I mounted at /media/storage. The only thing that I did differently from the walkthrough is that I used symlinks to redirect my downloads and documents folders to the mounted volume instead of changing the paths in /etc/fstab. I used this video to learn how to work with symlinks.
I had an issue with the Trash not working in the mounted volume, that I solved by adding uid=1000 in the mount options in /etc/fstab as advised here (I used udisks). Everything seemed to be working just fine after that.
Issue :This morning I tried to download a file with Google Chrome into the Downloads folder (which is now at /media/storage/Downloads) and I got an error "Failed - insufficient permissions". Same thing happened with Firefox. Both browsers download without issue if I use my home folder to save the file.
I read here that :
As a normal user you don't have the right to write anywhere except your home directory and its subdirectories, /tmp (the directory for temporary files) and the subdirectories of /media/"yourUsername" into which media you've connected to the computer are mounted.
Does this mean that I should have mounted my volume at /media/username/storage instead of /media/storage ? If I changed the mount path now in /etc/fstab, would this fix the issue or just mess everything up? Is there something else I'm missing ? What is the best, most sustainable way to fix this ?
More info (more issues) ?I just realized that I have some lock icons on my symlinks folders. They can't have been there yesterday, because everytime I try to modify anything in there, the system throws an error "Read-only file system". I know that I was able to add and delete files from there yesterday.
Here is the output of /media/storage$ ls -l
:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-22 at 12:56No idea how or why, but the good old "turn it off and on again" did the trick (EDIT : No it didn't, see EDIT 2 of my question). Why did it not work when I rebooted my computer earlier today ? Mystery. Anyway I will leave this here (and edit the title) since it is a good collection of the issues I had while working out my first dual boot and the methods I used to fix them.
QUESTION
I am dynamically getting data from my database to display on my website but I've encountered a problem and don't know how to fix it.
I have a main Home page which loads in a bunch of tiles that you can click on and take you to another page on my SPA. Some of the tiles you can click on can render STL objects from a file or some tiles will not when clicked on.
I have encountered an issue with my components that render STL files.
Issues?- Clickable Component is Multi Rendering my Model Component (or something like that?)
- I have unmount and remount
for each page view?
- General Issue with Project Setup?
- Issue with STL (Model) component can be found at the bottom
- Home.js (main component)
- ClickableImage (component that returns [])
- Layout.js (dynamic content pages)
- Model.js (Component that loads my model)
- Reproducible Code Current Issue CodeSandBox
11:03pm Feb 23 : Added in CodeSandBox
codesandbox code explanation. 2 Images are displayed, clicking on first image will take you to a layout that doesn't load in the STL file. The second image does. That's when everything breaks.
In Model.js under `/src/components/Layout/
Home.js ...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-24 at 06:17The problem is that useLoader()
is having issues fetching the file you are providing in the url
variable.
In your example, the value you end up providing as "url" is "./RaspberryPiCase.stl"
.
To fix your issue, simply provide the full absolute URL where your STL file can be fetched from.
Based on your provided Codesandbox, it's on your project /public
folder, so a simple way to fix your issue is doing:
QUESTION
I have a component that renders a child that when it's called from within another component, continuously unmount and remounts. I can't figure out why this is.
The code looks roughly like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-24 at 00:43In your current code, Header
(a component) is recreated each time Users
component is rerendered. This will lead to bugs because you don't want to recreate a child component (instead it maybe rerendered when needed).
And to prevent this, you should define Header
outside parent component i.e. Users
(Name should start with Upper Case).
So, Header
can be in a different file or in same file (but outside Users
). If Header
is going to be a large component, it is good to keep it in a different file.
// Don't do this
QUESTION
The background of my question is a set of test cases for my Linux-kernel Namespaces discovery Go package lxkns where I create a new child user namespace as well as a new child PID namespace inside a test container. I then need to remount /proc, otherwise I would see the wrong process information and cannot lookup the correct process-related information, such as the namespaces of the test process inside the new child user+PID namespaces (without resorting to guerilla tactics).
The test harness/test setup is essentially this and fails without --privileged
(I'm simplifying to all caps and switching off seccomp and apparmor in order to cut through to the real meat):
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jan-30 at 16:26Quite some more digging turned up this answer to "About mounting and unmounting inherited mounts inside a newly-created mount namespace" which points in the correct direction, but needs additional explanations (not least due to basing on a misleading paragraph about mount namespaces being hierarchical from man pages which Michael Kerrisk fixed some time ago).
Our starting point is when runc
sets up the (test) container, for masking system paths especially in the container's future /proc
tree, it creates a set of new mounts to either mask out individual files using /dev/null
or subdirectories using tmpfs
. This results in procfs
being mounted on /proc
, as well as further sub-mounts.
Now the test container starts and at some point a process unshares into a new user namespace. Please keep in mind that this new user namespace (again) belongs to the (real) root user with UID 0, as a default Docker installation won't enable running containers in new user namespaces.
Next, the test process also unshares into a new mount namespace, so this new mount namespace belongs to the newly created user namespace, but not to the initial user namespace. According to section "restrictions on mount namespaces" in mount_namespaces(7):
If the new namespace and the namespace from which the mount point list was copied are owned by different user namespaces, then the new mount namespace is considered less privileged.
Please note that the criterion here is: the "donor" mount namespace and the new mount namespace have different user namespaces; it doesn't matter whether they have the same owner user (UID), or not.
The important clue now is:
Mounts that come as a single unit from a more privileged mount namespace are locked together and may not be separated in a less privileged mount namespace. (The unshare(2) CLONE_NEWNS operation brings across all of the mounts from the original mount namespace as a single unit, and recursive mounts that propagate between mount namespaces propagate as a single unit.)
As it now is not possible anymore to separate the /proc
mountpoint as well as the masking submounts, it's not possible to (re)mount /proc
(question 1). In the same sense, it is impossible to unmount /proc/kcore
, because that would allow unmasking (question 2).
Now, when deploying the test container using --security-opt systempaths=unconfined
this results in a single /proc
mount only, without any of the masking submounts. In consequence and according to the man page rules cited above, there is only a single mount which we are allowed to (re)mount, subject to the CAP_SYS_ADMIN
capability including also mounting (besides tons of other interesting functionality).
Please note that it is possible to unmount masked /proc/
paths inside the container while still in the original (=initial) user namespace and when possessing (not surprisingly) CAP_SYS_ADMIN
. The (b)lock only kicks in with a separate user namespace, hence some projects striving for deploying containers in their own new user namespaces (which unfortunately has effects not least on container networking).
QUESTION
Background:
I have a bare metal Kubernetes cluster. The master node is diskful, however all of the worker nodes are diskless, and PXE boot off of a machine which provides their OS image and non-volatile NFS mount points.
We found early on that we needed some kind of non-volatile storage so that the diskless nodes could store their configurations, kubernetes secrets, SSL keys, etc... Without the non-volatile storage, the nodes would have to be deleted and rejoined to the cluster every time they rebooted, which is obviously a pain.
So we created NFS mount partitions for /etc/kubernetes and /var/lib/kubelet so that the nodes could remember who they were and rejoin the cluster after a reboot.
The Problem:
However, we have run into a problem with kubeadm: It unmounts/remounts /var/lib/kubelet whenever you run kubeadm join. This leads to kubelet puking and dying because it can't find the appropriate device. The specific error is:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jan-26 at 08:48This is a known issue but fortunately this is fixed just couple of days back - https://github.com/google/cadvisor/pull/2787.
This hasn't been cut into a release yet. While this might make into 1.20.x, not really sure about previous versions. Might want to request for a backport on the issue at https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/98009 if required.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install remount
Via yarn: yarn add remount
or npm: npm install remount
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page