unitest | Seamless node and browser unit | Dashboard library
kandi X-RAY | unitest Summary
kandi X-RAY | unitest Summary
Seamless node and browser unit testing with code coverage.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of unitest
unitest Key Features
unitest Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on unitest
QUESTION
Could someone help me understand the difference between unitest.patch
instantianed objects and classes? I'm trying to mock calls to sagemaker.Session.describe_training_job
.
I have a function that calls my_session = sagemaker.Session()
then calls my_session.describe_training_job()
later:
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-12 at 13:04A mock is a placeholder object, it does not have the mocked methods (though it may know which methods can be called if using autospec). Every method call on the mock that you do not explicitly provide just returns another mock object.
If you mock a class, and that class is instantiated in the tested code, the resulting instance will be another mock. The instantation is just a __call__
for the mock, which returns another mock as every call does (and it always returns the same mock for the same call). Similar to the result of a function call, this mock can be accessed via return_value
.
If you set an attribute on the class mock like in your first example, it is only bound to that class mock, not to the instance mock, so this allows to mock only class methods. The main point to understand here is that the class mock and the instance mock are not related like the class and the instance they are mocking. Both have the same Mock
type, and the instance mock doesn't know the class mock that has created it.
This means that instance method attributes have always to be set on the instance mock, as you have done in your second example. Using return_value
is eqivalent to that, so you could also write:
QUESTION
I am using Rider on Mac version 2021.1.2 and what I noticed is that when I run tests UniTest window for rider, there are times when even after tests are done executing, rider does not close session and the session is on forever.
- Clicking stop on the session does not respond
- The only way I found to get out of this situation is to close the Rider App.
I have been using Rider for a while and I have not seen this behavior before. Attaching a screen shot for the reference[
Is it a Rider bug or if there is anything I can do to deal with this?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-14 at 20:11There is a mechanism in Rider/ReSharper which detects that the test runner or dotnet process runs indefinitely due to different reasons. It shows you the following dialog in such cases:
If you don't get this dialog, check the selected options for If the ... process does not exit after
settings on the Preferences/Settings | Build, Execution, Deployment | Unit Testing | Test Runner
page.
QUESTION
Hi I am trying to add console output to a window created using PySimpleGui , It works Perfectly until I add html test-runner , can anyone suggest a method to use both of them at once
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-12 at 13:54Set option stream
to sg.Output.Widget
, and again, set option exit=False
of unittest.main
QUESTION
I would like to do something in my unit testing before it fails and using decorator to do so
Here is my code :
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-10 at 11:51My comment may not have been clear, so hereby the solution in code
QUESTION
I am trying to start unitests when user clicks a button on gui - for it i want to use simplepygui , i am wondering is it possible to do so if kindly suggest a way to implement
Sample Unitest code
class Sampletestclass(unittest.TestCase):
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-09 at 10:16For Anyone Who would be trying similar Was Able to get it to work by calling
QUESTION
As docs says https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/2.2/topics/testing/tools/#exceptions;
The only exceptions that are not visible to the test client are
Http404
,PermissionDenied
,SystemExit
, andSuspiciousOperation
. Django catches these exceptions internally and converts them into the appropriate HTTP response codes. In these cases, you can checkresponse.status_code
in your test.
I handle a custom a login mixin for raising an error to user logged in but has no access to that page.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-07 at 01:40I fixed this by disabling my logging inside settings for test mode.
QUESTION
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jan-02 at 16:35You could use a regex:
QUESTION
I'm building a testing framework for our Xunit tests. I wanted to create a fake SMTP service that will mimic ours but won't actually work for the tests (For obvious reasons).
Creating a fake instance was easy and worked like a charm. I've added before the modules my the registration of the fakeItEasyObject:
builder.RegisterInstance(A.Fake());
but now I want it to ALWAYS return true on EmailSender.Send()
, and I know I can achieve it from the actual unitests with the resolved instance: A.CallTo(()=>_emailSender.Send(A.Ignored)).Returns(true);
I don't want to do it on every test and was wondering if there is a way form to do it on registration. Do you know a way to do it?
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Nov-11 at 11:56Unless you're repeating your registration all over the place, you could just
QUESTION
i have a function that does something like
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Aug-28 at 22:29use string's function splitlines
QUESTION
In a Tycho build I have a pomless plugin-project/bundle A with some aspectj classes in it (*.aj). The project builds fine and another project B can reference project A via its manifest.mf. Now a separate unittest project C exists for testing project A. This unittest project C is intended to be build with standard pom.xml and maven-surefire (no manifest.mf exists in C).
The problem is that C cannot find the *.aj classes of project A. If I introduce a pom.xml in project A with maven-aspectj-plugin then A can be build and C finds anything it needs in A. But then project B cannot find bundle A. Are there any suggestions to resolve such a problem?
I'm relativly new to Tycho and i assume the problem belongs to the mix of the pom-less approach in project A and the pom-based approach in unittest project C. Is there any possibility to build the mentioned unitest project C pom-based or do i need to build it with tycho-surefire ?
I found this related question Aspectj class is not found by test class when running test with maven but it didn't help for me in this case.
Thanks in advance.
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Apr-25 at 13:25pom.xml should be used in project A, with packaging type eclipse-plugin, no dependencies set, and the usual plugin setup of aspectj-maven-plugin
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install unitest
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page