fourier-transform | Minimalistic and efficient FFT implementation | Android library

 by   scijs JavaScript Version: 1.1.2 License: No License

kandi X-RAY | fourier-transform Summary

kandi X-RAY | fourier-transform Summary

fourier-transform is a JavaScript library typically used in Mobile, Android applications. fourier-transform has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities and it has low support. You can install using 'npm i fourier-transform' or download it from GitHub, npm.

Minimalistic and efficient FFT implementation
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              fourier-transform has a low active ecosystem.
              It has 139 star(s) with 17 fork(s). There are 7 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 12 months.
              There are 2 open issues and 6 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 21 days. There are no pull requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of fourier-transform is 1.1.2

            kandi-Quality Quality

              fourier-transform has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

            kandi-Security Security

              fourier-transform has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.
              fourier-transform code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.
              There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

            kandi-License License

              fourier-transform does not have a standard license declared.
              Check the repository for any license declaration and review the terms closely.
              OutlinedDot
              Without a license, all rights are reserved, and you cannot use the library in your applications.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              fourier-transform releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.
              Deployable package is available in npm.
              Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi has reviewed fourier-transform and discovered the below as its top functions. This is intended to give you an instant insight into fourier-transform implemented functionality, and help decide if they suit your requirements.
            • Formats the current heap .
            • Creates an instance of the FFT module .
            • Multipline module
            • AMF module
            • Reversed sort .
            • Calculate FFT
            • Returns the magnitude of the vector
            • Set n zeros
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            fourier-transform Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for fourier-transform.

            fourier-transform Examples and Code Snippets

            Inverse Fourier Transform .
            pythondot img1Lines of Code : 118dot img1License : Non-SPDX (Apache License 2.0)
            copy iconCopy
            def inverse_stft(stfts,
                             frame_length,
                             frame_step,
                             fft_length=None,
                             window_fn=window_ops.hann_window,
                             name=None):
              """Computes the inverse [Short-time Fourier Transf  
            Compute the Fourier Transform .
            pythondot img2Lines of Code : 57dot img2License : Non-SPDX (Apache License 2.0)
            copy iconCopy
            def stft(signals, frame_length, frame_step, fft_length=None,
                     window_fn=window_ops.hann_window,
                     pad_end=False, name=None):
              """Computes the [Short-time Fourier Transform][stft] of `signals`.
            
              Implemented with TPU/GPU-compatible op  
            r Solve the Fourier transform .
            pythondot img3Lines of Code : 13dot img3License : Non-SPDX (Apache License 2.0)
            copy iconCopy
            def _solve(self, rhs, adjoint=False, adjoint_arg=False):
                rhs = linalg.adjoint(rhs) if adjoint_arg else rhs
                spectrum = _to_complex(self.spectrum)
                if adjoint:
                  spectrum = math_ops.conj(spectrum)
            
                rhs, spectrum = self._broadcast_bat  

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            Using FFT to approximate the CDF for an aggregate loss random variable
            Asked 2022-Apr-03 at 14:31

            Below you will find my python code for a class assignment I was given a couple weeks ago which I have been unable to successfully debug. The problem is about finding the value at risk (i.e., the p% quantile) for an aggregate loss random variable, using FFT. We are given a clear mathematical procedure by which we can gain an estimation of the discretized CDF of the aggregate loss random variable. My results are, however, seriously off and I am making some kind of mistake which I have been unable to find even after hours of debugging my code.

            The aggregate loss random variable S is given such that S=sum(X_i for i in range(N)), where N is negative binomially distributed with r=5, beta=.2, and X_i is exponentially distributed with theta=1. The probability generating function for this parametrization is P(z)=[1-\beta(z-1)]^{-r}.

            We were asked to approximate the distribution of S by

            1. choosing a grid width h and an integer n such that r=2^n is the number of elements to discretize X on,
            2. discretizing X and calculating the probabilities of being in equally spaced intervals of width h,
            3. applying the FFT to the discretized X,
            4. applying the PGF of N to the elements of the Fourier-transformed X,
            5. applying the inverse FFT to this vector.

            The resulting vector should be an approximation for the probability masses of each such interval for S. I know from previous methods that the 95% VaR ought to be ~4 and the 99.9% VaR ought to be ~10. But my code returns nonsensical results. Generally speaking, my index where the ECDF reaches levels >0.95 is way too late, and even after hours of debugging I have not managed to find where I am going wrong.

            I have also asked this question on the math stackexchange, since this question is very much on the intersection of programming and math and I have no idea at this moment whether the issue is on the implementation side of things or whether I am applying the mathematical ideas wrong.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Apr-03 at 14:31

            Not sure about math, but in snippet variable r gets overrided, and when computing f_tilde_vec_fft function PGF uses not 5 as expected for r, but 1024. Fix -- change name r to r_nb in definition of hyperparameters:

            r_nb, beta, theta = 5, .2, 1

            and also in function PGF:

            return (1 - beta * (z - 1)) ** (-r_nb)

            After run with other parameters remain same (such as h, n etc.) for VaRs I get [4.05, 9.06]

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71675713

            QUESTION

            Split string in to array of string in C
            Asked 2021-Dec-15 at 09:48

            I tried to convert a character array to string array. Means single string to multiple sentences.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Dec-15 at 09:48
            char **arr = (char **) malloc ((6) * sizeof (char));
            

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70361350

            QUESTION

            Plot a fourier transform of a sin wav with matplotlib
            Asked 2021-Jan-15 at 00:30

            I am trying to plot a fourier transform of a sign wave based on the scipy documentation

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Jan-11 at 04:24
            import numpy as np
            import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
            import scipy.fft
            
            def sinWav(amp, freq, time, phase=0):
                return amp * np.sin(2 * np.pi * (freq * time - phase))
            
            def plotFFT(f, speriod, time):
                """Plots a fast fourier transform
            
                Args:
                    f (np.arr): A signal wave
                    speriod (int): Number of samples per second
                    time ([type]): total seconds in wave
                """
            
                N = speriod * time
                # sample spacing
                T = 1.0 / 800.0
                x = np.linspace(0.0, N*T, N, endpoint=False)
            
                yf = scipy.fft.fft(f)
                xf = scipy.fft.fftfreq(N, T)[:N//2]
            
                amplitudes = 1/speriod* np.abs(yf[:N//2])
              
                plt.plot(xf, amplitudes)
                plt.grid()
                plt.xlim([1,3])
                plt.show()
            
            
            speriod = 800
            time  = {
                0: np.arange(0, 4, 1/speriod),
                1: np.arange(4, 8, 1/speriod),
                2: np.arange(8, 12, 1/speriod)
            }
            
            signal = np.concatenate([
                sinWav(amp=0.25, freq=2, time=time[0]),
                sinWav(amp=1, freq=2, time=time[1]),
                sinWav(amp=0.5, freq=2, time=time[2])
            ])   # generate signal
            
            plotFFT(signal, speriod, 12)
            

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65660991

            QUESTION

            Issue with displaying DFT output with openCV's imshow
            Asked 2020-Dec-21 at 21:28

            I was following the tutorial on this website to create a low-pass filter using NumPy and OpenCV in python. Instead of displaying the transformed image using pyplot as shown in the tutorial, I tried using OpenCV's imshow function but I am not getting the desired output.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Dec-19 at 12:20

            If you want to display data in type np.float32 you have to normalize it to 1.0

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65369482

            QUESTION

            Efficient Kullback–Leibler calculation
            Asked 2020-Oct-10 at 21:40

            I am looking to implement KL Divergence in C++ efficiently. (CPU Only for now).

            Much like AES or FTT (Fast Fourier transform) whereby use of a common function has lead to hardware level optimizations (Intel AES and Intel FTT). Is there anything similar for natural log, or slightly higher level efficiencies (ASM/C) that prevent bottlenecks of executing many Natural log functions in success (If they exist)?

            Same use case examples:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Oct-10 at 21:28

            You can use SSE instructions to calculate the logarithm of many values in parallel. But whether you can actually make use of those instructions depends heavily on how the rest of the calculations you are going to do depend on the logarithms you calculate, so it is not possible to give a more specific answer.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64298405

            QUESTION

            Spectrogram generation in java using FFT on a .wav file not producing expected output
            Asked 2020-Jul-25 at 11:07

            So I am making an AI project that classifies speech into either "up", "down", "left", right or background noise, and from this, a character in a videogame is moved.

            I have made an FFT algorithm deriving it from the mathematical explanation, which I believe is correct as I have tested its output against that from this site (https://engineering.icalculator.info/discrete-fourier-transform-calculator.html)

            I then have tried to generate a spectrogram and have used code based on the code from the main function of the App class from this site (Creating spectrogram from .wav using FFT in java)

            I tested my code on a .wav file of me saying hello and the spectrogram generated is not what I was expecting out, see below the difference between my java made spectrogram and my python made spectrogram (ignore the colour difference).

            Java Spectrogram

            Python Spectrogram

            New Java Spectrogram with SleuthEyes help

            Here is the original code I have used/written:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Jul-24 at 10:47

            Reading the .wav file

            The .wav file decoding included in that other question you linked is hardly a full blown decoder. It accounts for the OP's specific stereo 2bytes-per-sample use-case.

            It looks like you stumbled upon other decoding issues while trying to adapt it to a different use case. As a general piece of advice, I'd suggest to use a more complete .wav decoder which would take into account the number of channels, the number of bytes-per-sample, etc.

            If on the other hand you want to craft your own decoder (for example as a learning exercise), then a slightly more robust implementation may look like the following:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63015469

            QUESTION

            Intel integrated performance primitives Fourier Transform magnitudes
            Asked 2020-Jul-23 at 02:17

            When I am using Intel IPP's ippsFFTFwd_RToCCS_64f and then ippsMagnitude_64fc I get a massive peak at zero index in magnitudes array.

            My sine wave is long and main component I am interested is somewhere between 0.15 Hz and 0.25 Hz. I take the sample with 500Hz sampling frequency. If I reduce mean from the signal before FFT I get really small zero component not that peak anymore. Below is a pic of magnitudes array head:

            Also the magnitude scaling seems to be 10 times the magnitude I see in the time series of the signal e.g. if amplitude is 29 in magnitudes it is 290.

            I Am not sure why this is so and my question is 1. Do I really need to address the zero index peak with mean reduction and 2. Where does this scale of 10 come?

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Jul-23 at 02:17

            Do I really need to address the zero index peak with mean reduction?

            For low frequency signal analysis a small bias can really interfere (especially due to spectral leakage). For sake of illustration, consider the following low-frequency signal tone and another one with a constant bias tone_with_bias:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/62896442

            QUESTION

            ValueError: x and y can be no greater than 2-D, but have shapes (2, 1, 1) and (2,)
            Asked 2020-Jul-07 at 16:56

            Source code

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Jul-07 at 16:09

            You need to use reshape:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/62779125

            QUESTION

            Want to detect blur from image, but couldn't get it right
            Asked 2020-Jun-29 at 12:43

            I am actually want to convert this blur detection into C++. As a beginner in OpenCV, I am actually following this for conversion, But maybe I am getting it wrong. Here is my approach. I have to use DFT instead of FFT in C++.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Jun-29 at 12:43

            I think this comes close to the original Python code

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/62611751

            QUESTION

            FFT using Python
            Asked 2020-Jun-19 at 16:47

            I am receiving data from a vibration sensor in the form of two numpy arrays. The first array represents the actual values for the vibration measurement and the second array is the corresponding time information (timestamp). For example:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Jun-19 at 16:45

            This is really a signal processing question, not a Python one. You have several options here:

            • if your data is uniformly sampled - you can ignore the timestamps altogether. All the information you need is in the data, and the (constant) sampling frequency: f_s = 1.0 / (timestamps[1] - timestamps[0])
            • if not, you can either:
              • use Non-uniform DFT (here is one implementation, haven't tried)
              • interpolate the data between non-uniform timestamps so it becomes uniform. Note that effectively, this applies a low-pass filter to your data, which may be not what you want (more on the effects of interpolation here).

            In all cases, when you perform FFT, time information is not required anymore, as you are in the frequency domain.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/62474562

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install fourier-transform

            You can install using 'npm i fourier-transform' or download it from GitHub, npm.

            Support

            If you find it slow, difficult or broken, please post an issue. If you have ideas or know-hows for better implementation - PR’s are welcome.
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
            Install
          • npm

            npm i fourier-transform

          • CLONE
          • HTTPS

            https://github.com/scijs/fourier-transform.git

          • CLI

            gh repo clone scijs/fourier-transform

          • sshUrl

            git@github.com:scijs/fourier-transform.git

          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link