BuildingBlocks | Common components to accelerate development | Frontend Framework library
kandi X-RAY | BuildingBlocks Summary
kandi X-RAY | BuildingBlocks Summary
Common components to accelerate development of Sugar integrations
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of BuildingBlocks
BuildingBlocks Key Features
BuildingBlocks Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on BuildingBlocks
QUESTION
I am building a CV creator in React. I have a form, a preview component and their closest parent component is Main. What I want to achieve is that when a user is typing inside form fields, the preview fields on the right get automatically updated with data from form but I just can't get it to work. This is my first project in React, and I cannot use hooks or functional components. I know that I am doing something wrong, but cannot pinpoint what.
Main component
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-26 at 07:24The issue is with your handleInputChange
. setState
should be a function call.
QUESTION
I'm trying to force password reset after the first logon (in Azure ADB2C) using the Custom Policies as explained in the "reset password" repo.
I'm using the custom policies, and a validation error accours while I'm trying to upload the "SignUpOrSignin.xml" custom policy. The message is:
A required Metadata item with key "ApplicationObjectId" was not found in the TechnicalProfile with id "AAD-UserRemoveMustResetPasswordUsingObjectId" in policy "B2C_1A_signup_signin" of tenant "resetpasswordtest.onmicrosoft.com"
These are the steps I followed:
- I downloaded the custom policies XMLs file from this GitHub example (as stated at the end of the readme.md file)
- I "substituted" the "yourtenant.onmicrosoft.com" and "facebook client"
- I "merged" the "SignUpOrSignin.xml" and "TrustFrameworkExtensions.xml" with the ones taken from the "reset password" repo.
- I created the "mustResetPassword" extension attribute (using the Azure portal)
- I created one user using the graph utilies (in that why I'm 100% sure that the user has been created in a safe way with the proper "mustResetPassword" extension attribute)
- Finally I uploaded the following xmls into the portal (in order):
TrustFrameworkBase.xml
TrustFrameworkExtensions.xml
PasswordReset.xml
ProfileEdit.xml
SignUpOrSignin.xml
The problem occur when I try to upload the last one (SignUpOrSignin.xml) What is wrong here? Here you can find the full implementation of the previous 5 xml files.
Please take a look to the following section where I pasted the "TrustFrameworkExtensions.xml" and "SignUpOrSignin.xml" custom policies.
Thanks for reading
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-24 at 21:10You missed out configuring the policy for extension attribute support. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory-b2c/user-flow-custom-attributes?pivots=b2c-custom-policy#azure-ad-b2c-extensions-app
This entire process can be automated with my tool: https://aka.ms/iefsetup before starting to use the samples.
QUESTION
I have published a NuGet package (BuildingBlocks) to Github Packages. I use a nuget.config file to specify the nuget sources for my project, along with the credentials for my package (credentials replaced with placeholders on purpose):
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-03 at 13:50My assumption is that your BuildingBlocks package is defined in your GitHub package feed. If so, then it's conflicting with an already existing package at https://www.nuget.org/packages/BuildingBlocks. Unfortunately, NuGet doesn't have deterministic behavior when resolving packages and multiple feeds are specified in NuGet.config. The reason for the actual errors is that the BuildingBlocks package in nuget.org has dependencies on those other packages listed in the errors which haven't been published to nuget.org.
The easiest way to resolve this is to rename your package to not conflict with a package name that exists in nuget.org.
The other option is to create a single NuGet feed with upstream sources that allow you to deterministically control the feed source of packages. I don't know if this can be done in GitHub but I know it can be done with Azure DevOps: Upstream sources.
Benefits of upstream sources
Upstream sources enable you to manage all of your product's dependencies in a single feed. We recommend publishing all of the packages for a given product to that product's feed, and managing its dependencies from remote feeds in the same feed, via upstream sources. This setup has a few benefits:
- Simplicity: your NuGet.config, .npmrc, or settings.xml contains exactly one feed (your feed).
- Determinism: your feed resolves package requests in order, so rebuilding the same codebase at the same commit or changeset uses the same set of packages.
- Provenance: your feed knows the provenance of packages it saved via upstream sources, so you can verify that you're using the original package, not a custom, or malicious copy published to your feed.
- Peace of mind: packages used via upstream sources are guaranteed to be saved in the feed on first use. If the upstream source is disabled/removed or the remote feed goes down or deletes a package you depend on, you can continue to develop and build.
QUESTION
I'm using Azure B2C to connect to an external OpenID Connect identity provider, i created a basic user flow within B2C which works but only brings back a small number of claims so i need to create a custom policy to pass custom input parameters to my IDP and collect additional claims.
I started with the SocialAndLocalAccount sample and modified with my IDP's details:
TrustFrameworkBase.xml (Cut down to Technical Profile + User Journey)
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Feb-26 at 07:58I think the technical profile for sign in is not configured correctly. You can find a working example using OpenIdConnect in the starter pack samples.
Please refer in the samples e.g. to
- LocalAccounts\TrustFrameworkBase.xml: Technical profile
login-NonInteractive
- LocalAccounts\TrustFrameworkExtensions.xml: Technical profile
login-NonInteractive
- LocalAccounts\SignUpOrSigning.xml
QUESTION
It's a little bit difficult to explain, I apologies for that. But I need help. I'm working on generic approach for events. All my code base on eShopOnContainers example but my handlers should return a value.
In eShopOnContainers there is just Task
as a return type, so they can easy
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jan-24 at 18:46To solve your problem a simple solution is to use dynamic
(see here).
QUESTION
I have been stuck on this from a week where I am trying to append a XML node to a parent XML element. the child node and the parent node look like this :
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jan-18 at 10:05You can't append an XmlNode
from a different XML document. Instead you have to create a node from the document to be appended to:
QUESTION
I have the following code (from a tutorial, but I want to expand it a bit):
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Oct-20 at 18:37This is freehand so it might not be 100% correct, but you can simulate an index for loop in Vue. I've added a variable selectedNumberOfTasks
which would just be a number (a data variable or something) that represents what the user has selected.
QUESTION
I am using the Single-Page Application built on MSAL.js with Azure AD B2C together with the A B2C IEF Custom Policy - Sign Up and Sign In with 'Terms of Use' prompt and a custom RestAPI profile to enrich the output claims.
Everything seems fine until I press the "Call API" button of the application, which prompts the "I agree to the Terms of Service" popup:
This should not be happening, as the latest ToS were agreed upon signup. The same happens if I logout and login again. So somehow aquiring the access token prompts the same popup.
I believe that this prompt should be displayed only on signin anyway (i.e. when acquiring an id token), so something is not quite right with my setup.
Btw, the id token looks fine to me:
How could I fix this?
This is the custom policy that I am using:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Aug-20 at 12:15Can you add
QUESTION
I have some b2c SAML CustomPolicy for one SP. Here I have some OutputClaims. Now I want to send one Claim with some logic and tried to set OutputClaimTransformations.
My scenario: I will send the claim "ABCString: 0,1" for Croatia and "ABCString: 0,2" for germany. 0 is some default value I need to send and the next value should be country dependent. So I created one Transformation for defaultvalue, then one for country dependent, then I merge both in one collection and will join them in one string. I attached my XML.
Problem is: the "ABCString" is never sent to application. The OutputClaims of the ClaimsTransformations are not used at all. All examples I found were in Extension or Base File and are using "persistent" fields. I just want to build the value on request.
Some ideas for this?
my xml:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Apr-30 at 12:25I don't believe any output claims transformations are invoked for a relying party technical profile.
Rather, you must invoke the output claims transformations during the user journey, such as follows.
- Define a new claims transformation technical profile that invokes the new output claims transformation:
QUESTION
I am a new .NET Core user. I am trying to perform integration testing on a ASP.NET.Core WebAPI that uses EF Core for managing data. Architecture is based on eShopContainers DDD sample. I am using Xunit for testing and have considered three approaches for resetting the database running in a docker-compose stack, to an initial state prior to running each test:
- Test Setup: Create and seed database with test data, TearDown: Remove database.
- Test Setup: Seed database table with test data, TearDown: Clear test data.
- Test Setup: Create a transaction, TearDown: Abort transaction.
The System Under Test executes create/delete/update operations within a transaction using BeginTransaction(). Not sure if EF Core can use nested transactions so have tried performing options 1 and 2 when testing.
The code below uses WebApiTestFactory as a class derived from WebApplicationFactory
. This is provided as a class fixture to create a TestServer instance for testing.
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Mar-12 at 18:09Solved, by using test setup/teardown per test as opposed to class fixture and restarting the identity on postgresql's new default identity column within the table, as suggested here.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install BuildingBlocks
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page