unified | ☔️ interface for parsing inspecting transforming | Parser library
kandi X-RAY | unified Summary
kandi X-RAY | unified Summary
unified is an interface for processing text using syntax trees. It’s what powers remark (Markdown), retext (natural language), and rehype (HTML), and allows for processing between formats.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Create a new processor .
- Register plugin .
- Processes a VFile .
- Runs the given AST nodes
- Core functions
- Merges the processor into the current processor .
- Process a single file .
- Sync synchronously .
- Create data and set namespace .
- Add plugin .
unified Key Features
unified Examples and Code Snippets
Lines of Code : 106License : Non-SPDX (Apache License 2.0)
Copydef enable_check_numerics(stack_height_limit=30,
path_length_limit=50):
r"""Enable tensor numerics checking in an eager/graph unified fashion.
The numerics checking mechanism will cause any TensorFlow eager execution or def callback(self,
op_type,
inputs,
attrs,
outputs,
op_name=None,
graph=None):
"""Eager-function unified callback for checking numerics."""
del attrs, o 
License : No LicenseCopyfunction unifiedDiff (err, escape) {
var indent = ' ';
function cleanUp (line) {
if (escape) {
line = escapeInvisibles(line);
}
if (line[0] === '+') {
return indent + colorLines('diff added', line);
}
if (line #define ADDR_BASE 0x401C4000
#define ADDR ((void *)0x401C4000)
void function( void )
{
__asm volatile
(
" ldr r3, .ADDRESS \n"
" mov r2, %0 \n"
" str r2, [r3, %1] import 'package:readmore/readmore.dart';
ReadMoreText(
'Flutter is Google’s mobile UI open source framework to build high-quality native (super fast) interfaces for iOS and Android apps with the unified codebase.',
trimLines: 2,
col.syntax unified
.thumb_func
adds r1, r2, #0
movs r1, r2
0: 1c11 adds r1, r2, #0
2: 0011 movs r1, r2
void foo_basic(uint8_t *pDst, uint8_t *pSrc, intptr_t length)
{
//assert(length >= 64);
//assert(length & 7 == 0);
uint8x16_t in0, in1, in2, in3;
uint8x8_t out;
const uint8x16_t mask = {1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 12stack_size = 0x400
stack_start = 0x20000000+stack_size
gpiob_base = 0x40010C00
rcc_base = 0x40021000
rcc_apb2enr = rcc_base+0x18
gpio_crl = gpiob_base
gpiob_odr = .thumb
.syntax unified
.section .vectors
.word 0x20001000
.word Reset_Handler
.section .text
.thumb_func
Reset_Handler:
BL init
BL main
B No_Handler
.thumb_func
No_Handler:
B No_Handler
.thumb_func
init:
LD.syntax unified
.cpu cortex-m3
.thumb_func
stmfd r3!, {r0, r1} @ different error message, but still only unified syntax
stmfd r9!, {r0, r1, r11, lr} @ only in unified
stmfd sp!, {lr} @ only in unified
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on unified
QUESTION
Given the following F# snippet:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-31 at 23:48There won't be a correct syntax, this is just impossible.
Think about what would be the return type of f2. Since it's a record with a field Children that is a list of the same record, it would look something like this:
QUESTION
I am runnng Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M7 with Jakarta EE 9.1 Web Profile. When I run the application using a JTA datasource configuration, the code runs, however when I change to a RESOURCE_LOCAL configuration, the code fails with the exception below. The SQL in the query runs on the JTA configuration.
Please assist.
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-17 at 18:53By default you are running on an EE container, so it is using a JTA datasource.
If you really want to use RESOURCE_LOCAL, you should check this link on the TomEE documentation, i.e. you define a non-jta datasource in the container (via resources.xml or tomee.xml) and reference it via in the persistente.xml
You can find some information regarding the configuration of a datasource on the TomEE website.
QUESTION
My goal is to generate some data with certain fields. My idea was to get all possible values from the field and then randomly pick values for my data.
So I want for example the possible values of a currency field :
I need to access all the values from the first column
So I can move them to an internal table and randomly pick them.
How can I move the possible values of a field into an internal table?
I will need to do this multiple times from different tables, so a unified method would be great.
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-10 at 08:30You can use F4IF_FIELD_VALUE_REQUEST function module for getting search help values. You can use this function for currency like below:
QUESTION
Forgive me if this is a really stupid question, but I haven't found any answers yet - or maybe I don't know the correct thing to ask for.
Given the following files that are part of the same project:
- MyProject.html
- MyProject.css
- MyProject.js
(and a MyProject.py that runs on the server to make things happen)
. . . where all three of these items are related and are actually part of a single project and they need to integrate together.
The "html" part of VS code makes sure the html is correct.
The "css" part of VS code makes sure the css is correct.
the JavaScript part of VS code makes sure the javascript is correct.
However, they may not be correct together as a unified whole - I may have changed something in the javascript that references something in the html that may not yet exist - because I forgot to write it, and I don't discover this until I launch things and watch the web-page go all pear-shaped in ways I've never heard of before.
Is there something that will take all these pieces and say "Hey! You changed the definition of this element here in the Javascript but not in the HTML (or the CSS or whatever)
In other words, not only do I want to know if the individual files are syntactically correct, but do they agree with each other?
If there is a "something" that does this, what is it called?
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-10 at 19:23That tool will never exist and for good reasons, it'd slow the living hell out of your computer when programming and wouldn't fair well as a best practice. Though it's cool, it's cooler to write code effectively and not have a slow code editor. So to that suggestion is write your JavaScript and HTML together hand in hand; split view and you won't ever have an issue. CSS can come into play any time.
Your best option for knowing if code is correct, would be a linter but that won't help you with the issues you face if you're calling elements that don't exist or did you'll want to improve how you code these functions/events.
As requested submitted as an answer for the OP.
QUESTION
I'm trying to synchronize CSS animations for multiple page elements receiving the same animation class.
There seems to be a lot of posts about this subject but no unified solution, and none of the solutions I've found seem to apply to this case.
I've prepared a jsfiddle here to demonstrate the issue:
https://jsfiddle.net/gdf7szo5/1/
If you click on any of the letters it will start the animation for that letter. If you click again it will switch to a different animation, and if you click a third time it will set the letter to have no animation at all.
The desired effect is for all letters blinking in one animation to be synchronized with each other, and any letters in the other animation to be synchronized with each other. To be clear, I'm not trying to synchronize the two animations — I just want all the elements with a given animation to be synchronized with each other.
But currently if one letter shows an animation and you set another letter to the same animation, unless you have absolutely perfect timing the animations for the two letters will be out of sync even though they're the same animation.
Here's the code in play:
HTML:
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Jan-02 at 22:58In order to synchronize them, the animation should be initialized at the same time.
Here I specify the animation-name for span, the animation won't run until the other props are defined (actually I'm curious to see if different rendering engines share the same behavior).
QUESTION
Shared aggregation seems to express nothing more than a simple association. It is apparently a "modeling placebo" with no objective reason to use it (except in specific contexts where modelers have agreed between them on specific additional semantic).
Several sources claim however that shared aggregation would imply absence of cycles in the aggregation graph of instances. This would make aggregation a powerful tool in the domain of graph modeling.
But I couldn't find any evidence of those claims in the specifications. Did I miss some indirect evidence (e.g. interplay of several constraints)?
More details The quoteIn their book The Unified Modeling Language Reference Manual, 2nd Edition, Booch, Jacobson and Rumbaugh claim about (shared) aggregation:
The distinction between aggregation and association is often a matter of taste rather than a difference in semantics. Keep in mind that aggregation is association. Aggregation conveys the thought that the aggregate is inherently the sum of its parts. In fact, the only real semantics that it adds to association is the constraint that chains of aggregate links may not form cycles, which is often important to know, however. (...) In spite of the few semantics attached to aggregation, everybody thinks it is necessary (for different reasons). Think of it as a modeling placebo.
Other rather well informed sources(e.g. uml-diagrams.org and several academic papers) keep the directed acyclic graph for granted as well.
Verification against the UML specificationsThe books is from 2004, based on UML 2.0. But most of this claim is still verified in the UML 2.5.1 specification. Shared aggregation is defined therein in very vague terms and without any objective advantage over a simple association (p.112):
Sometimes a Property is used to model circumstances in which one instance is used to group together a set of instances; this is called aggregation. To represent such circumstances, a Property has an aggregation property, of type AggregationKind; (...)
...
shared : Indicates that the Property has shared aggregation semantics. Precise semantics of shared aggregation varies by application area and modeler.
Another clause about aggregation prevents some special cycling situations (p.200):
An end Property of an Association may only be marked as a shared or composite aggregation if the Association is binary and the other end is not marked as a shared or composite aggregation.
I have however not found any evidence that "chains of aggregate links may not form cycles" in the general case. I also did not find other properties such as transitivity and anti-symetry which could allow to infer the absence of cycles.
Is the claim by the UML inventors now obsolete? Or did I miss something in the current specs that would allow to derive this statement ?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-12 at 11:32I think my favorite page 110 of UML 2.5 is quite clear about this:
Sometimes a Property is used to model circumstances in which one instance is used to group together a set of instances; this is called aggregation. To represent such circumstances, a Property has an aggregation property, of type AggregationKind; the instance representing the whole group is classified by the owner of the Property, and the instances representing the grouped individuals are classified by the type of the Property. AggregationKind is an enumeration with the following literal values:
none Indicates that the Property has no aggregation semantics. shared Indicates that the Property has shared aggregation semantics. Precise semantics of shared aggregation varies by application area and modeler. composite Indicates that the Property is aggregated compositely, i.e., the composite object has responsibility for the existence and storage of the composed objects (see the definition of parts in 11.2.3).Composite aggregation is a strong form of aggregation that requires a part object be included in at most one composite object at a time. If a composite object is deleted, all of its part instances that are objects are deleted with it.
Emphasis by me. Shared aggregation is out of the run in any case since its semantic is undefined by definition. So the implication is only for composite aggregation.
What is the standard?
UML has quite some history. And there are lots of citations out there. Only the fewest get updates along with UML evolving. Although Booch et al. invented UML, they are no longer defining the standard. That's done by OMG and they publish the ISO standard (for which you can pay extra money if you like). Quite some terms go round which have ancient origins and are outdated the one or other way. Still, they are being used - and in the now wrong context.
Is the standard perfect?
Definitely not. It's evolving and still has quite some flaws or misconceptions. In my opinion the introduction of shared aggregation in UML 2.0 was not a so good idea. To define something that has no definition per definition seems odd. And looking at the confusion about this concept proves me right.
QUESTION
I got this code to almost work, despite much ignorance. Please help on the home run!
- Problem 1: INPUT:
I have a long list of URLs (1000+) to read from and they are in a single column in .csv. I would prefer to read from that file than to paste them into code, like below.
- Problem 2: OUTPUT:
The source files actually have 3 drivers and 3 challenges each. In a separate python file, the below code finds, prints and saves all 3, but not when I'm using this dataframe below (see below - it only saves 2).
- Problem 3: OUTPUT:
I want the output (both files) to have URLs in column 0, and then drivers (or challenges) in the following columns. But what I've written here (probably the 'drop') makes them not only drop one row but also move across 2 columns.
At the end I'm showing both the inputs and the current & desired output. Sorry for the long question. I'll be very grateful for any help!
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-27 at 21:36Store your data in a list of dicts, create a data frame from it. Split the list of drivers / challenges into single columns and concat it to the final data frame.
QUESTION
On Macs with discrete graphics cards, Managed buffers should be used instead of Shared Buffers, however there are additional requirements to maintain synchronisation using [MTLBuffer:didModifyRange:].
However on Apple Silicon, if I force the use of Managed buffers by pretending [MTLDevice hasUnifiedMemory] returns NO, and removing calls to didModifyRange:, then the rendering is working just fine.
What's the best way to test Managed buffers on Apple Silicon where the GPU memory is unified so that I can be sure my code will work on older Macs?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Nov-07 at 20:12The best practice for testing hardware compatibility is on the actual hardware in which you are testing compatibility. If you plan on supporting discrete GPUs, which are substantially different from Apple Silicon, it would be best to have access to one for testing.
You might approximate behavior, but remember that it is only a emulation, and there is no way to ensure that the actual hardware will work the same.
It would be akin to developing with the Simulator only, which is not at all a good practice.
UPDATE: There are numerous services that rent access to bare metal Macs. The MacInCloud service allows you to configure a machine with an external GPU (such as a AMD RX 580). It is only $0.99 for the first 24 hours.
There are many similar services out there, but that is the first service I was able to verify that discrete GPUs are an option.
QUESTION
I have X sources that contain info about assets (hostname, IPs, MACs, os, etc.) in our environment. The sources contain anywhere from 1500 to 150k entries (at least the ones I use now). My script is supposed to query each of them, gather that data, deduplicate it by merging info about the same assets from different sources, and return unified list of all entries. My current implementation does work, but it's slow for bigger datasets. I'm curious if there is better way to accomplish what I'm trying to do.
Universal problem
Deduplication of data by merging similar entries with the caveat that merging two assets might change whether the resulting asset will be similar to the third asset that was similar to the first two before merging.
Example:
~ similarity, + merging
(before) A ~ B ~ C
(after) (A+B) ~ C or (A+B) !~ C
I tried looking for people having the same issue, I only found What is an elegant way to remove duplicate mutable objects in a list in Python?, but it didn't include merging of data which is crucial in my case.
The classes usedSimplified for ease of reading and understanding with unneeded parts removed - general functionality is intact.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-21 at 00:04Summary: we define two sketch functions f and g from entries to sets of “sketches” such that two entries e and e′ are similar if and only if f(e) ∩ g(e′) ≠ ∅. Then we can identify merges efficiently (see the algorithm at the end).
I’m actually going to define four sketch functions, fos, faddr, gos, and gaddr, from which we construct
- f(e) = {(x, y) | x ∈ fos(e), y ∈ faddr(e)}
- g(e) = {(x, y) | x ∈ gos(e), y ∈ gaddr(e)}.
fos and gos are the simpler of the four. fos(e) includes
- (1, e.
os), if e.osis known - (2,), if e.
osis known - (3,), if e.
osis unknown.
gos(e) includes
- (1, e.
os), if e.osis known - (2,), if e.
osis unknown - (3,).
faddr and gaddr are more complicated because there are prioritized attributes, and they can have multiple values. Nevertheless, the same trick can be made to work. faddr(e) includes
- (1,
h) for eachhin e.hostname - (2,
m) for eachmin e.mac, if e.hostnameis nonempty - (3,
m) for eachmin e.mac, if e.hostnameis empty - (4,
i) for eachiin e.ip, if e.hostnameand e.macare nonempty - (5,
i) for eachiin e.ip, if e.hostnameis empty and e.macis nonempty - (6,
i) for eachiin e.ip, if e.hostnameis nonempty and e.macis empty - (7,
i) for eachiin e.ip, if e.hostnameand e.macare empty.
gaddr(e) includes
- (1,
h) for eachhin e.hostname - (2,
m) for eachmin e.mac, if e.hostnameis empty - (3,
m) for eachmin e.mac - (4,
i) for eachiin e.ip, if e.hostnameis empty and e.macis empty - (5,
i) for eachiin e.ip, if e.macis empty - (6,
i) for eachiin e.ip, if e.hostnameis empty - (7,
i) for eachiin e.ip.
The rest of the algorithm is as follows.
Initialize a
defaultdict(list)mapping a sketch to a list of entry identifiers.For each entry, for each of the entry’s f-sketches, add the entry’s identifier to the appropriate list in the
defaultdict.Initialize a
setof edges.For each entry, for each of the entry’s g-sketches, look up the g-sketch in the
defaultdictand add an edge from the entry’s identifiers to each of the other identifiers in the list.
Now that we have a set of edges, we run into the problem that @btilly noted. My first instinct as a computer scientist is to find connected components, but of course, merging two entries may cause some incident edges to disappear. Instead you can use the edges as candidates for merging, and repeat until the algorithm above returns no edges.
QUESTION
I created two simple classes A and B in Visual Paradigm software, such that there there a COMPOSITION between these two classes. However, the generated code (in Java) is the same with OR without the association between these two classes. In other words, the generated code, if there is a composition between class A and B, is the same as when I deleted the composition between class A and class B. That is, the composition between classes is NOT considered in generated code by Visual Paradigm. What is the solution?
Edit: Based on the request of @Christophe, I added the photo of a test example project (class diagram), along with two Java class generated by Visual Paradigm, where in both cases (with and without composition relation between two classes) the generated codes are exactly the same.
Generated codes by Visual Paradigm:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-13 at 07:22In your VP diagram you have added a composition relation that leaves a lot of things unspecified:
- it does not indicate if the association is navigable or not
- it does not show multiplicities
- it does not specify the role (i.e. name of the association end)
Each of these could be an obstacles to the proper code generation:
- without navigability, the tool doesn't know if you intend to refer to the other side (or if there is no navigability, i.e. no reference that would easily find the other side).
- without multiplicities, the tool doesn't know if it has to generate a simple java field refering to one object, or a collection of objects
- without role, the tool doesn't know how you want to name the java field that should implement the associated/composed object.
Different tools make different assumptions. VP shows the following tool-specific behavior:
- if you open your composition's specification, you'll see that navigability is assumed to be true in both direction if it's unspecified (this is VP specific and not an UML standard).
- default multiplicity used for code generation is 1 if it's left unspecified in the diagram.
- but a missing role causes the java association/composition not to be generated: VP would not know how to name it.
Here the diagram I’ll for demo purpose:
The specification of the composition looks like:
If there is a role name (here A and B), the code corresponding to the structural relationship is very well generated:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install unified
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page
