minidb | a simple wraper for local/session storage DOM API management | User Interface library
kandi X-RAY | minidb Summary
kandi X-RAY | minidb Summary
A simple wrapper for the local/session storage DOM API management. The API is now compatible to Internet Explorer 6~8. NOTE2: When using older browsers remember to import JSON api from Special thanks to @zenorocha and @guipn.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of minidb
minidb Key Features
minidb Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on minidb
QUESTION
This is freaking me out, I just can't find a solution to it. I have a grammar for search queries and would like to match any searchterm in a query composed out of printable letters except for special characters "(", ")". Strings enclosed in quotes are handled separately and work.
Here is a somewhat working grammar:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Jan-11 at 09:24You could solve that by introducing a lexical mode that you'll enter whenever you match an EQ
token. Once in that lexical mode, you either match a (
, )
or a whitespace (in which case you pop out of the lexical mode), or you keep matching your NOT_SPECIAL
chars.
By using lexical modes, you must define your lexer- and parser rules in their own files. Be sure to use lexer grammar ...
and parser grammar ...
instead of the grammar ...
you use in a combined .g4
file.
A quick demo:
QUESTION
I want to parse query expressions that look like this:
Person Name=%John%
(Person Name=John% and Address=%Ontario%)
Person Fullname_3="John C. Smith"
But I'm totally new to Antlr4 and can't even figure out how to parse one single TABLE FIELD=QUERY clause. When I run the grammar below in Go as target, I get
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Nov-12 at 23:24Try looking at the tokens produced for that input using grun Mdb tokens -tokens
. It will tell you that the input consists of two table names, an equals sign and then another table name. To match your grammar it would have needed to be a table name, a field name, an equals sign and a string.
The first problem is that TABLENAME
and FIELDNAME
have the exact same definition. In cases where two lexer rules would produce a match of the same length on the current input, ANTLR prefers the one that comes first in the grammar. So it will never produce a FIELDNAME
token. To fix that just replace both of those rules with a single ID
rule. If you want to, you can then introduce parser rules tableName : ID ;
and fieldName : ID ;
if you want to keep the names.
The other problem is more straight forward: John
simply does not match your rules for a string since it's not in quotes. If you do want to allow John
as a valid search term, you might want to define it as searchterm : STRING | ID ;
instead of only allowing STRING
s.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install minidb
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page