hops | Universal Development Environment | Frontend Framework library
kandi X-RAY | hops Summary
kandi X-RAY | hops Summary
Universal Development Environment
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of hops
hops Key Features
hops Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on hops
QUESTION
Overview
I am trying to tabulate time over days under Google Sheets and see each person's availability based on their start and end times which changes almost every week.
File Information I have this Sample Availability Timesheet with two Sheet-Tabs.
Master Sheet-Tab: This Sheet-Tab contains the list of employees with their respective start-time & end-time.
Availability Sheet-Tab: This Sheet-Tab contains the list of employees and a timescale with one hour hop. The resource availability is marked with Y, and by N if the resource is not available using the following formula:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-15 at 14:04Updated formula:
=IF(VALUE(VLOOKUP($A2, Master!$A:$M, 13, 0)) > VALUE(VLOOKUP($A2, Master!$A:$M, 12, 0)), IF(ISBETWEEN(B$1, VALUE(VLOOKUP($A2, Master!$A:$M, 12, 0)), VALUE(VLOOKUP($A2, Master!$A:$M, 13, 0))), "Y", "N"), IF(OR(B$1 <= VALUE(VLOOKUP($A2, Master!$A:$M, 13, 0)), B$1 >= VALUE(VLOOKUP($A2, Master!$A:$M, 12, 0))), "Y", "N"))
Screenshot from the sheet you've shared with the formula working:
This version is an extension of the formula you shared. If someone is working from 4PM to 2AM then the way IFBETWEEN
is being used will throw an error because 2AM is numerically less than 4PM and hence there is nothing in between.
So in cases where someone starts at a PM time and ends at AM time the formula checks for all slots between 12AM and the person working AM and marks them a Y. At the same time the formula also checks for all times in PM that are greater than the person working PM and marks them a Y as well.
If the person starts at a PM time and ends at a greater PM time then it uses your initial version of the formula.
I have made a slight modification to your formula and it should work now.
=IF($C9>$B9, IF(ISBETWEEN(B$1, VLOOKUP($A2, $A$8:$C, 2, 0), VLOOKUP($A2, $A$8:$C, 3, 0)), "Y", "N"), IF(OR(B$1 <= VLOOKUP($A2, $A$8:$C, 3, 0), B$1 >= VLOOKUP($A2, $A$8:$C, 2, 0)), "Y", "N"))
Please remember to remove the dates from some of the cells ex in your sheet the value in C2
is 12/31/1899 2:00:00 and it should be changed to just 2:00:00.
QUESTION
The predicate getDataFromCache(StringAddress,Cache,Data,HopsNum,directMap,BitsNum) should succeed when the Data is successfully retrieved from the Cache (cache hit) and the HopsNum represents the number of hops required to access the data from the cache which can differ according to direct map cache mapping technique such that: • StringAddress is a string of the binary number which represents the address of the data you are required to address and it is six binary bits. • Cache is the cache using the representation discussed previously . • Data is the data retrieved from cache when cache hit occurs. • HopsNum the number of hops required to access the data from the cache. • BitsNum The BitsNum is the number of bits the index needs.
getDataFromCache is always giving me false although everythings seems working so I want someone to fix it
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-12 at 19:01simply hopsNumber is always zero and you don't have to traverse since it's direct you can access it using nth0 perdicate Also you are using the T variable twice
QUESTION
I'm trying to configure a simple network structure using Vagrant as depicted in the following figure:
As you can see I aim to simulate a hacker attack which goes from attacker
through router
and reaches victim
, but that's not important for the problem I'm struggling with.
This is my Vagrantfile so far (VritualBox is used as provider):
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-03 at 22:55You've got a redundant default gateway on victim
and attacker
called _gateway
. You should delete it and leave only the one going to the router via eth1
interface.
QUESTION
I have a cluster of Artemis in Kubernetes with 3 group of master/slave:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-02 at 01:56I've taken your simplified configured with just 2 nodes using a non-wildcard queue with redistribution-delay
of 0
, and I reproduced the behavior you're seeing on my local machine (i.e. without Kubernetes). I believe I see why the behavior is such, but in order to understand the current behavior you first must understand how redistribution works in the first place.
In a cluster every time a consumer is created the node on which the consumer is created notifies every other node in the cluster about the consumer. If other nodes in the cluster have messages in their corresponding queue but don't have any consumers then those other nodes redistribute their messages to the node with the consumer (assuming the message-load-balancing
is ON_DEMAND
and the redistribution-delay
is >= 0
).
In your case however, the node with the messages is actually down when the consumer is created on the other node so it never actually receives the notification about the consumer. Therefore, once that node restarts it doesn't know about the other consumer and does not redistribute its messages.
I see you've opened ARTEMIS-3321 to enhance the broker to deal with this situation. However, that will take time to develop and release (assuming the change is approved). My recommendation to you in the mean-time would be to configure your client reconnection which is discussed in the documentation, e.g.:
QUESTION
I am doing some work on worm-attack detection in RPL. In RPL, the communication between the clients might be multiple hops, with the packets going through many nodes.
However, only the receiver gets a tcpip_event
on reception of the packet. The nodes that the route passes through do not get this event. Is there any way to detect the packet on the intermediate nodes?
ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-27 at 13:01You cannot get a notification or callback when a packet is forwarded. However, you can get a callback when a packet is received or sent by the lower layers.
In Contiki, use the function rime_sniffer_add
for that. Check apps/powertrace/powertrace.c
for an example.
In Contiki-NG the function has been renamed to netstack_sniffer_add
.
Usage example:
Declare the sniffer like this, in the global scope:
QUESTION
I have an architecture where I have multiple instances but I want to maximize cache hits.
Users are defined in groups and I want to make sure that all users that belong to the same group hit the same server as much as possible.
The application is fully stateless, but having users from the same group hitting the same server will dramatically increase performance and memory load on all instances.
When loading the main page I already know which server I would like to send this user to on the XHR call.
Using the ARRAffinity
cookies are not really great is almost impossible in this scenario (cross domain, have to make server call first etc) and I would strongly prefer sending a hint myself through a custom header.
I'm trying manually to do some workarounds with deleting the cookies and assigning them, but it feels very hacky and I don't get it fully working yet. and it doesn't work for XHR calls.
Question:
Is it possible to direct to a specific instance through a header, url or domain instead of a cookie?
Notes
- Distributed cache does not work for me in this case. I need the performance of memory cache without extra network hops and serialization/deserialization.
- This seems to be possible with Application Gateway, but it seem to need a lot of extra infrastructure and moving parts while all my problems would be fixed by sending the "right" header.
- I could fix this by duplicating the web app in its entirety and assigning a different hostname. Also this feels like adding a lot of extra moving parts that can break. Also maintenance will be harder and more confusing, I loss autoscale, etc.
- Maybe this can be fixed easily by Kubenetes/Docker Swarm type of architecture (no experience), but as this is a large legacy project and I have a pretty strict deadline I am very cautious of making such a dramatic switch last minute.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-14 at 14:57If I am understanding correctly you want to set a custom header via a client application and based on that proxy over the connection to some other backend server.
I like to use HAProxy for that, you can also look into Nginx as well for that. You can install HAProxy on linux from the distribution's package manager, or you can use the available HAProxy docker container. An example of installing it on ArchLinux:
QUESTION
I am setting up a cluster of Artemis in Kubernetes with 3 group of master/slave:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-11 at 23:49First, it's important to note that there's no feature to make a client reconnect to the broker from which it disconnected after the client crashes/restarts. Generally speaking the client shouldn't really care about what broker it connects to; that's one of the main goals of horizontal scalability.
It's also worth noting that if the number of messages on the brokers and the number of connected clients is low enough that this condition arises frequently that almost certainly means you have too many brokers in your cluster.
That said, I believe the reason that your client isn't getting the messages it expects is because you're using the default redistribution-delay
(i.e. -1
) which means messages will not be redistributed to other nodes in the cluster. If you want to enable redistribution (which is seems like you do) then you should set it to >= 0, e.g.:
QUESTION
ping 8.8.8.8 -t 5 -c1 | awk '{if (/Time.*/) print $1,$2; else if (NR==1) print "from: " $3 " "}'
When i use this line the else if doesn't work, it basically prints from and the ip no matter what first, even before the if conditional. I want it print it only when the TTL is enough to reach the target (Or when there isn't a message involving Time to live exceeded)
This command is basically a traceroute written by me.
I don't know why the else if conditional doesn't work, i would love help.
The whole bash script:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-03 at 09:06That's expected. The first line doesn't match Time.*
but NR is 1, as it's the first line. Therefore, $3 is printed, which happens to be (8.8.8.8)
.
On the following lines, NR is never 1 again, so only the when the line matches Time.*
, you'll get the output.
To fix the problem, remember the IP on the first line, and print it at the end if you didn't print anything.
QUESTION
Let's say that I have 3 ActiveMQ Artemis brokers in one cluster:
- Broker_01
- Broker_02
- Broker_03
In a given point of time I have a number of consumers for each broker:
- Broker_01 has 50 consumers
- Broker_02 has 10 consumers
- Broker_03 has 10 consumers
Let's assume at this given point of time there are 70 messages to be sent to a queue in this cluster.
We are expecting load balancing done by the cluster so that Broker_01 would receive 50 messages, Broker_02 10 messages, and Broker_03 also 10 messages, but currently we are experiencing that the 70 messages are distributed randomly through all the 3 brokers.
Is there any configuration I can do to distribute the messages based on the number of consumers in each broker?
I just read the documentation. So, as far as I understood, ActiveMQ does load balancing, based on round robin, if we configure cluster connection. Our broker.xml looks like this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-19 at 15:33There is no out-of-the-box way for the producer to know how many consumers are on each broker and then send messages to those messages to those brokers accordingly.
It is possible for you to implement your own ConnectionLoadBalancingPolicy
. However, in order to determine how many consumers exist on the queue load-balancing policy implementation would need to know the URL of all the brokers in the cluster as well as name of the queue to which you're sending messages, and there's no way to supply that information. The ConnectionLoadBalancingPolicy
interface is very simple.
I would encourage you to revisit your need for a 3-node cluster in the first place if each node is going to have so few messages on it. A single broker can handle a throughput of millions of messages in certain use-cases. If each node is dealing with less than 50 messages then you probably don't need a cluster at all.
QUESTION
Currently the configuration to embed a specific visual through the JS powerbi-client does not allow passing in filters. See "Embed a report visual" for the configuration supported. Note that you are able to pass in filters at embed time for a report. See "Embed a report". Not being able to filter a visual at embed time results in 2 hops (once to load the visual with default filters, then another to load with expected filters).
Feature Request: I'd love for the feature to be added to filter at embed time for visuals like it exists for reports.
The way I do this now is hide the visual, embed it, set filters when loaded, then show it when rendered.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-19 at 05:42Currently, Visual embedding does not support configuration for adding filters at embed time i.e. phased embedding is not possible for visuals.
The approach you are following currently is the best way to update filters for visuals.
One minor correction would be that you don't need to hide the visual because it will be rendered only after filter is updated.
Please refer below snippet for embedding visual with filters:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install hops
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page