hacked | Hacked? - have i been pwned? Android App | Android library

Did you hear about the Firebase App Check. It would restrict access to your Firebase serviced only from your App or Web Page.

You can link your App with App Check so Firebase would only work with your App. In that case even a 100% reverse engeenered game would not work at all.

It's possible by building the IModel by hand

Did more research today. The problem here is that %% counts as an argument to "run" something, but above it is where it's supposed to be defined. It's not.

I just used %diskspace% for a new script that outputs my Sink volume. It would work the same with the C script.

You'll need to add a Web Application Firewall (WAF) in front of your web app. You can either use Azure Front Door or Azure Application Gateway and enable WAF, then you just need to setup the geomatch custom rule (which is currently in preview).

More info:

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/web-application-firewall/ag/geomatch-custom-rules

Here is possible approach

You need to store all the sublists of data per ticker into it's own list. Instead of blending them all. Then you can use itertools chain.from_iterable to make one large list per ticket, take every even item as a key and odd item as as values in a dictionary, and put the final dict for each ticker into a larger list. That can turn into a dataframe.

You won't lose precision if you work with timedelta as shown. The internal representation is always nanoseconds. After calculating the timedelta, you can convert to integer to obtain the difference in nanoseconds. Ex:

Ok so first, starting with .Net 4.5, (most of) the AntiXSS library is part of the framework itself, it is in System.Web.Security.AntiXss, you don't need to provide the dll separately.

By default, the framework html encodes output when written from Razor with @, or from asp.net with <%: (instead of <%=). What this does is html encoding, and .Net does this by default with it's previous, blacklist based method, which has a list of characters to encode (like eg. < and so on), and leaves alone the rest. That is ok for many usecases, but switching to AntiXss with encoderType="System.Web.Security.AntiXss.AntiXssEncoder" enables a whitelist based encoder, which means it has a list of "harmless" characters like letters and numbers, and encodes everything else, which makes it more secure in more scenarios.

Note a few things though.

• AntiXSS as included in the framework does not support the html sanitizing features previously present in the AntiXSS library. You usually don't need that, the usecase for that is when you delibertaely have html user input which you also want to display as html (like for example a rich text editor on the web ui), and even then the method in AntiXss was not very robust and secure for the purpose, I guess that's why it was left out.
• Different contexts need different encoding. In a html context (between html tags) just using @myVar in Razor or <%: myVar %> in asp is fine, and will be correctly encoded. It will mostly be ok for html attributes too, but in an attribute you might want to use the specific attribute encoding method AntiXssEncoder.HtmlAttributeEncode. For Javascript (in a script tag, or in event attributes like on*), you need JavascriptEncode, and even that is only secure if used in quoted strings (that's why by default it adds the quotes).
• Request validation does not prevent xss in general. It does prevent some basic attack vectors, but many are left untouched by request validation and you have to take care of those by hand (especially, but not exclusively the javascript related ones).

So in short, there is no magic bullet against XSS. You cannot just fix it in one place and forget about it, if that was possible, the framework would probably already do that. You need to apply the correct encoding in each and every place where user input makes it into a page. The only help is that if you use the correct output methods (@ and <%:), basic html encoding is applied automatically, but as discussed above, that does not work for javascript, and certain other scenarios (for example writing a user provided url in a link will likely result in a user being able to provide javascript:alert(1) - and no encoding will remove this, which is just nasty).

Based on this, to answer your explicit questions:

1. The standard encoded output tags (@ and <%:) apply basic html encoding. Whether this is the older standard blacklist based, or the more secure whitelist based depends on whether you select the AntiXss encoder, already in the framework.
2. No, but there is some help if you use the correct tags. But in general you have to review each and every variable output.
3. All validaterequest does is it looks for a less than character directly followed by a letter in any user input (url variable or form field, but not for example cookie values and request headers, which also might become attack vectors). You should not really rely on that too much. Unfortunately I don't know how you can display a custom error page (it's been a while since I did .Net), but I'm pretty sure it's possible. :)

To create a double-sided bar chart, you can create two subplots with shared x- and y-axis. Each subplot is a horizontal bar chart with a specified marker color