kotlin-coroutines-retrofit | Kotlin Coroutines await extension for Retrofit Call | Android library
kandi X-RAY | kotlin-coroutines-retrofit Summary
kandi X-RAY | kotlin-coroutines-retrofit Summary
Kotlin Coroutines await() extension for Retrofit Call
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of kotlin-coroutines-retrofit
kotlin-coroutines-retrofit Key Features
kotlin-coroutines-retrofit Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on kotlin-coroutines-retrofit
QUESTION
I am trying to configure my android app to use Firebase Cloud Firestore. I also have dependencies on OKHttp3. Gradle will sync fine but I am unable to compile the app and run it. And I get the following error:
Program type already present: com.squareup.okhttp.Address
I have followed all the steps described here: https://firebase.google.com/docs/firestore/quickstart and I can run the app fine until I add this line to my build.gradle file:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Apr-23 at 14:09It turned out the problem was not related to OkHttp - it was related to the Dexer compiler in the new version of android studio (3.0.0 and above) Going into the gradle.properties file and adding this line:
QUESTION
I'm using kotlin coroutines and kotlin retrofit coroutines to do network requests in the project I'm currently working on. But I'm unable to figure out how to make my unittests for the logic pass.
Here's my code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Jan-07 at 16:04You found solution, but maybe for other people, especially beginners, it might be helpful to explain why you were getting errors in the first place and why runBlocking
helps. The issue is, that when running unit tests, the expectation is, that these tests are synchronous, that is, if any code is executed on some separate thread some time later, the test runner will never know about that, because for the test runner the test is finished when it's method call on the test runner's thread is finished.
Therefore it is impossible to test code not running on the main thread. In fact, it is even a bad practice trying to do that. Since there is no guarantee of when the code running on another thread will finish (if ever), we don't know what state the main thread will be in at the time (the main thread might not even exist anymore, as is the case with unit test runner).
Even if it were somehow possible to test code executed in other threads, every test run would inevitably be different (as a consequence of the above paragraph) and tests might produce different results on every run. That goes directly against the ideology of tests being reliable and yielding the same results on every single run.
Therefore when testing, all tested code needs to run on the main thread and one should make sure to never try call any asynchronous code in tests.
The runBlocking
coroutine, unsurprisingly runs the code within it in blocking manner, on the thread it is launched from (as opposed to launch
, that will cause the code to be run asynchronously).
There's one caveat to all this, that coroutines are not threads, but if you replace the word thread
in the above text for asynchronous coroutine
, the text will not lose any of its meaning. What I said is applicable for both when you're using traditional threads and also when you're using coroutines.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install kotlin-coroutines-retrofit
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page