android-compose-codelabs | repository contains a set of Android Studio projects | Android library

 by   googlecodelabs Kotlin Version: Current License: Apache-2.0

kandi X-RAY | android-compose-codelabs Summary

kandi X-RAY | android-compose-codelabs Summary

android-compose-codelabs is a Kotlin library typically used in Mobile, Android applications.,roid-compose-codelabs has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has medium support. You can download it from GitHub.

This repository contains a set of Android Studio projects to help you learn about Compose in Android. Each sample contains the code for a specific Compose codelab. For more information about Jetpack Compose, please read the documentation.
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              android-compose-codelabs has a medium active ecosystem.
              It has 930 star(s) with 430 fork(s). There are 24 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 6 months.
              There are 17 open issues and 40 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 79 days. There are 6 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of android-compose-codelabs is current.

            kandi-Quality Quality

              android-compose-codelabs has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

            kandi-Security Security

              android-compose-codelabs has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.
              android-compose-codelabs code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.
              There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

            kandi-License License

              android-compose-codelabs is licensed under the Apache-2.0 License. This license is Permissive.
              Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              android-compose-codelabs releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.
              Installation instructions are not available. Examples and code snippets are available.
              It has 14695 lines of code, 419 functions and 320 files.
              It has low code complexity. Code complexity directly impacts maintainability of the code.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
            Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of android-compose-codelabs
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            android-compose-codelabs Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for android-compose-codelabs.

            android-compose-codelabs Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for android-compose-codelabs.

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            Can I use mutableStateOf() instead of produceState in Compose?
            Asked 2022-Mar-20 at 06:31

            The Code A is from the official sample project.

            I don't think the produceState is necessary, so I think I can replace Code A with Code B, is it right?

            BTW, the Code B can run.

            Code A

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Mar-20 at 06:31

            Let's take a look at productState under the hood:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71231210

            QUESTION

            How to write a StateFlow in ViewModel instead of produceState in Compose?
            Asked 2022-Mar-16 at 11:10

            The Code A is from the official sample project.

            I'm learning the Compose by the article and the project.

            I was told by the article the following content.

            We could map what the screen needs to display and the UiState in the ViewModel layer by using a stream of data, a StateFlow of type DetailsUiState, that the ViewModel updates when the information is ready and that Compose collects with the collectAsState() API that you already know about.

            Could you change Code A as StateFlow in ViewModel to do the same work?

            Code A

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Feb-23 at 19:45

            Hey here is my answer to your question

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71233122

            QUESTION

            Why does the author need to pass the paramter Modifier again and again in Compose ?
            Asked 2022-Mar-15 at 01:21

            The following Code A are from the official sample project.

            The paramter Modifier is passed among the functions again and again in Code A.

            I don't understand fully why the author need to design to pass the paramter Modifier among the functions again and again .

            I think Code B is simple. What benefits will the design framework of Code A get ?

            Code A

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Feb-22 at 15:30

            statusBarsPadding() or navigationBarsPadding() as a matter of fact any other Modifiers has to added in its relevant functions.

            In the above Code B, let's say DetailsActivity has BottomNavigationBar. Now BottomNavigationBar padding has to be added to DetailsScreen.

            It is not always possible to add all the Modifiers to DetailsContent (from the above code) when we have more composable functions or in future, that can be changed to some other.

            Maintenance will be easy when we have modifiers at every level.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71220070

            QUESTION

            Do I need to warp the collectAsState() of a hot Flow with repeatOnLifecycle in @Composable?
            Asked 2022-Mar-12 at 10:51

            I have read the article A safer way to collect flows from Android UIs.

            I know the following content.

            A cold flow backed by a channel or using operators with buffers such as buffer, conflate, flowOn, or shareIn is not safe to collect with some of the existing APIs such as CoroutineScope.launch, Flow.launchIn, or LifecycleCoroutineScope.launchWhenX, unless you manually cancel the Job that started the coroutine when the activity goes to the background. These APIs will keep the underlying flow producer active while emitting items into the buffer in the background, and thus wasting resources.

            The Code A is from the official sample project.

            The viewModel.suggestedDestinations is a MutableStateFlow, it's a hot Flow.

            I don't know if the operation collectAsState() of hot Flow is safe in @Composable UI.

            1: Do I need to use the Code just like Code B or Code C replace Code A for a hot Flow?

            2: Is the operation collectAsState() of cold Flow safe in @Composable UI.

            Code A

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Mar-12 at 10:51

            collectAsState (Code A) is safe for any kind of Flow (cold/hot it doesn't matter). If you look at how collectAsState is implemented then you will see that it uses a LaunchedEffect deep down (collectAsState -> produceState -> LaunchedEffect)

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71246146

            QUESTION

            Why doest a temp image keep to display when I use ImagePainter.State.Success in Compose?
            Asked 2022-Mar-07 at 12:36

            The following Code A is from the official sample project.

            I think Code A is wrong, I think there are two Images in the line, the left image is a real image which is displayed when it has been loaded, and the right image is a temp image which is displayed when the real iamge is loading.

            So I replace Code A with Code B.

            But in fact the UI displays a temp image named ic_crane_logo first, then displays real image as I expected when I run Code A. And the UI keeps to display the temp iamge when I run Code B.

            What is the problem with my thinking and code?

            Code A

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Mar-07 at 05:48

            rememberImagePainter does not start loading an image.

            It only starts when the corresponding Image is added to the view tree and has non-zero dimensions.

            As long as it is not loaded, Image is a transparent view, and you get no performance gain by removing it from the view tree, so part Code A is completely correct.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71263082

            QUESTION

            Why can't the ViewModel object be created automatically when I use Hilt as Dependency Injection in Jetpack Compose?
            Asked 2022-Mar-07 at 01:46

            The following Code A is from the official sample project.

            The project use Hilt as Dependency Injection.

            In my mind, I needn't create the ViewModel object by myself because Hilt will create it automatically.

            But in Code A, it seems that viewModel: MainViewModel = viewModel() must be created manually, why?

            Code A

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Feb-27 at 03:50

            By creating manually, I mean calling the view model constructor. And this is not practiced with Hilt, because you have to pass down all the injections.

            You can't just declare the viewModel: MainViewModel parameter, because then you have to pass it from the calling view.

            The viewModel() does all the injection magic for you. Also, if the view model already exists, the same object will be returned. So it's completely automatic.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71248093

            QUESTION

            What are differents between fillParentMaxWidth() and fillMaxWidth() in Compose?
            Asked 2022-Feb-25 at 14:27

            The following Code A is from the official sample project.

            It seems that I get the same UI result after I replace the two fillParentMaxWidth() with fillMaxWidth().

            What are differents between fillParentMaxWidth() and fillMaxWidth() in Compose?

            Code A

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Feb-25 at 14:27

            As here LazyColumn is used fillParentMaxWidth fill be same as fillMaxWidth.

            In case of LazyRow, fillMaxWidth will raise an error. So fillParentMaxWidth can be used.

            And the other way for LazyColumn.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71262411

            QUESTION

            Is Jetpack Compose Navigation good design for navigating?
            Asked 2022-Feb-07 at 10:17

            The following code are from the official sample project.

            There are two branches, main and end.

            I found the Code main and the Code end using different ways to navigate.

            Code main is simple and clear, and in other projects, it navigate based State just like Code A which is from the project.

            Code end use NavHostController to navigate, but It seems that we need't to use Navigation again when we use Jetpack Compose, right?

            Code main

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Jan-04 at 08:22

            I've worked with Compose since the early alpha stages and became quickly disappointed with Google's lame attempt at providing a more modern approach to navigating a single-activity app. When you consider that Android's view-based system was entirely replaced with the declaration approach that Compose uses, you have to seriously wonder why they would stick with a navigation controller that doesn't allow you pass objects from one screen to another. There was also the issue that adding animation when transitioning from one screen to another was an afterthought. There is an add-on that supports animation transitions.

            But perhaps the worst thing about Compose was its lack of handling device configuration changes. Under the older view-based system, you defined your layouts in xml files and placed these in resource folders that had qualifiers in the folder name that would aid Android in picking the correct layout based on things like screen density, orientation, screen size, etc. That went out the window with Compose. Eventually Google did add APIs to handle composables that need to be selected based on screen sizes and densities. But ultimately, you end up writing this decision logic within your composable and your code starts to look like spaghetti. Google's Android team completely forgot about the most basic "Separation of Concerns" when they chose to mix UI layouts with the logic that determines which layout gets selected. Designing your composables is one thing and how they get selected is another. Don't mix the two. Your composables become increasingly less reusable when you integrate those APIs. The original developers of Android (who weren't from Google) knew well enough to have the operating system manage the layout selection based upon changes to device configurations.

            I chose to create my own framework that handles navigation and manages composables in almost an identical way that the view-based system works. It also remedies the issue of not being able to pass objects from screen to screen. If you are interested, you can check it out at:

            https://github.com/JohannBlake/Jetmagic

            So to answer you question about whether Compose Navigation is good for navigating, I would have to say no. I have worked with it and have found it severely lacking. If you want to be just-another-run-of-the-mill-Android-developer, then use Compose Navigation. But if you want to chart your own path and liberate yourself from Google's poor design practices, then use Jetmagic or even better, create your own navigation framework. It isn't that hard.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70573175

            QUESTION

            How is the paramter onScreenChange : (String) -> Unit passed to the function body : @Composable ((String) -> Unit) -> Unit?
            Asked 2022-Jan-13 at 01:07

            The Code A is from the main branch of the official sample project.

            There are three subclass Overview, Accounts and Bills of the enum class RallyScreen in the project.

            There is a function fun content(onScreenChange: (String) -> Unit) { body(onScreenChange) } which accept the paramater onScreenChange : (String) -> Unit in the class RallyScreen.

            Although the statement is enum class RallyScreen(val body: @Composable ((String) -> Unit) -> Unit) {..}, the body = { OverviewBody() } in the class Overview, the body = { AccountsBody(UserData.accounts) } in the class Accounts and the body = { BillsBody(UserData.bills) } in the class Bills don't require to pass the paramter (String) -> Unit), why can Kotlin run well and navigate by Tab well when the App launch fun content(onScreenChange: (String) -> Unit) { body(onScreenChange)} ?

            Code A

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Jan-09 at 06:26

            Remember that each of the on variables is a callback. onScreenChange implicitly passes the variable it as String, but it is not necessary to use the variable within your callback.

            1. it is implicitly passed, but in the GitHub link you gave, the programmer decided to rename it to onScreenChange. That callback then was passed to OverviewBody, which overrides the default {}, as you said. What I don't understand about your question is where onAccountClick is coming from. That is not a parameter of OverviewBody, according to the GitHub code.

            2. content has a parameter for another callback, which you noticed. The body variable for each class in the enum is then invoked, and the callback parameter is passed to the invocation. In the future, that callback will only be used by OverviewBody. Remember that body(callback) is the same as body.invoke(callback).

            I hope this helps. Please let me know if anything needs some more explanation.

            For further reference:

            Additional Content Edit:

            1. I see the parameters in your code, not the one on GitHub. My apologies for missing that.
            2. body is a variable function. This means that the variable function can be invoked, either by writing body(...) or body.invoke(...). The String parameter it, which is passed implicitly, is ignored and the default values are used, unless specified like you suggested (onAccountClick=it).

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70503343

            QUESTION

            How to instance a ViewModel class automatically with Hilt when I use Compose?
            Asked 2022-Jan-02 at 12:44

            The Code A is from the end branch of the official sample project.

            The project use Hilt to implement dependency injection.

            In my mind, I needn't to instance a ViewModel class manually when I use Hilt, and the system will automatically instance a ViewModel when it needs.

            But It seems that the author use the code viewModel: MainViewModel = viewModel() to instance the ViewModel class manually in Code A, how can I instance a ViewMode class automatically with Hilt when I use Compose?

            Code A

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2022-Jan-01 at 18:49

            As stated in the documentation

            The viewModel() function mentioned in the ViewModel section automatically uses the ViewModel that Hilt constructs with the @HiltViewModel annotation. We've provided documentation with information about Hilt's ViewModel integration.

            So as long as your viewmodel has the @HiltViewModel annotation, you don’t have to change anything.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70526973

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install android-compose-codelabs

            You can download it from GitHub.

            Support

            For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
            CLONE
          • HTTPS

            https://github.com/googlecodelabs/android-compose-codelabs.git

          • CLI

            gh repo clone googlecodelabs/android-compose-codelabs

          • sshUrl

            git@github.com:googlecodelabs/android-compose-codelabs.git

          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link

            Explore Related Topics

            Consider Popular Android Libraries

            leakcanary

            by square

            butterknife

            by JakeWharton

            tips

            by git-tips

            material-dialogs

            by afollestad

            Try Top Libraries by googlecodelabs

            tools

            by googlecodelabsGo

            android-testing

            by googlecodelabsKotlin

            android-room-with-a-view

            by googlecodelabsJava

            android-navigation

            by googlecodelabsKotlin

            your-first-pwapp

            by googlecodelabsJavaScript