Git-Repository | Perl interface to Git repositories | Text Editor library

You can execute an arbitrary list of xt, but you have to use your own word to execute this list, by applying execute to each xt from the list.

By the current standard, a standard program cannot compile arbitrary code into allocated memory. The program may only compile into the code space of the dictionary, and in the frame of the current definition (i.e., that is not yet completed). Compilation can be performed via compile, ( xt -- ) or postpone ( i*x "name" -- j*x ) words. Also the words literal, 2literal, sliteral, fliteral (or their counterparts lit,, 2lit,, slit,, flit,) can be used to compile literals.

In Gforth you can also compile into another dictionary ("section"), that can be allocated using word extra-section ( size "name" -- ).

You have 2 options:

• Inject your PAT in the clone url:

I didn't manage to get it working in the end (I suspect it's an Unreal-Related Bug), but I found another way using the included Unreal HTTP Module:

I found the answer in the link above. The '%' character needs to be escaped like so:

to see all your branches, go like this after you fetch

Is this still true today?

Yes, still true today: a submodule reference a full repository.

You can configure a submodule to be sparse-checked out, in order to display only a subset of its content (see also this example).

But in your case, you would still need a symlink (symbolic link) in order to make quentincaffeino-console visible where you want it in your main repository.

The way git stores history means that there isn't really an answer to this question. To explain:

• A commit in git stores a snapshot of the entire repository, not a record of the changes in that commit (the storage of that snapshot is optimised, but that's not relevant to the question).
• A standard commit has a single parent; if you ask for the changes introduced in a commit, git just compares its snapshot with the snapshot on its parent.
• A merge commit has two or more parents - one from each of the branches involved in the merge. Theoretically, there is no "main" parent; although in practice, the first parent is generally the branch you had checked out, and the second (and any further) parents are the arguments you passed to "git merge" or "git pull".
• When you ask git for the changes introduced in a merge commit, it has to compare it with something, such as one of the two parents.
• When you resolve a merge conflict, you generally do so before committing the result. So the conflicted version is never recorded as a separate commit, and so just isn't there to compare against later.
• Note that even without a conflict, it's possible for a merge commit to contain code that didn't come from either of its parents - it is, as far as git is concerned, just another snapshot of the repository.

The closest you could come would be to replay the merge, and compare the result of that with the merge commit. However, different tools and options will use different strategies to perform the merge, so there is no guarantee that the reply would actually reconstruct what the developer saw when they performed the original merge.

Following this issue and the Terraform documentation, I would try the URL

Thanks @adrian for your reply this answer my question for at least a part. I was more looking for a way of just go get 'company.com/whatever' but this is ok.

So if I understand correctly I need to go get bitbucket.org/company/whatever first and then go mod edit -replace bitbucket.org/company/whatever=company.com/whatever

Thanks