rring | SIP call testing infrastructure | Testing library

by voxserv Perl Version: Current License: GPL-2.0

X-Ray Key Features Code Snippets Community Discussions(4)Vulnerabilities Install Support

kandi X-RAY | rring Summary

rring is a Perl library typically used in Testing applications. rring has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Strong Copyleft License and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

This is a test infrastructure for SIP automated tests. More docs to follow.

Support

Quality

Security

License

Reuse

Support

rring has a low active ecosystem.

It has 6 star(s) with 1 fork(s). There are 4 watchers for this library.

It had no major release in the last 6 months.

rring has no issues reported. There are no pull requests.

It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.

The latest version of rring is current.

Quality

rring has no bugs reported.

Security

rring has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

License

rring is licensed under the GPL-2.0 License. This license is Strong Copyleft.

Strong Copyleft licenses enforce sharing, and you can use them when creating open source projects.

Reuse

rring releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of rring

Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

rring Key Features

No Key Features are available at this moment for rring.

rring Examples and Code Snippets

No Code Snippets are available at this moment for rring.

Community Discussions

Trending Discussions on rring

R function to retrieve last seen information for individuals

R function to search for potentially dead individuals in dataset

How do I convert a dataset with 1 column per day to only 1 date column (days) with R

What do I need to change to implement SOLID design correctly?

QUESTION

R function to retrieve last seen information for individuals

Asked 2020-Dec-04 at 03:59

I have a dataset with observations of individuals every day from 2015 to 2020. I have a function that gives me the list of "assumed alive" from a chosen date (individuals that have been seen this year) with their ID's and their last seen date.

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-Dec-04 at 03:59

You can select the columns that you want to keep.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65121693

QUESTION

R function to search for potentially dead individuals in dataset

Asked 2020-Dec-02 at 22:07

I have a dataset with observations of individuals every day from 2015 to 2020. I want to ask R to give me "assumed dead" (individuals that haven't been seen for a year). Is there a function where I can ask who is assumed dead this month? For example I want to enter the month and the year and then R print me the list of all assumed dead this month (or at a specific date as I also have the date column).

Here is a subset of my dataset

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-Dec-02 at 05:43

your_date <- as.Date('2020-12-01')
date_diff <- your_date - as.Date(BIRD_data$Date)
BIRD_data[date_diff>365,]

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65102744

QUESTION

How do I convert a dataset with 1 column per day to only 1 date column (days) with R

Asked 2020-Dec-01 at 18:41

I have a dataset with birds observations. I have one column for each day of the month (31). If the bird is seen this day, it has the "place" info (where it has been seen). Can someone help we with a code that can merge these 31 columns (days) into one date column and another second column with the "place" information? I think I can use the "dcast" function from "reshape2" package but I don't know how to use it to keep the two informations (day and place).

Here is the structure of my dataset:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2020-Dec-01 at 18:41

Easiest way is simply to select the columns you want to pivot and put everything else into some other format.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65086812

QUESTION

What do I need to change to implement SOLID design correctly?

Asked 2019-Oct-20 at 11:46

I'm trying to learn SOLID design and think I have made a mistake. I think that the IItem interface does not follow Liskov substitution principle within my Player class however, I can't work out how to fix this. If I add a new interface drawing from IItem I would have to change Player's method to add a case to handle it.

I would like for the Player class to only need one method for equip so need help understanding what I have done wrong and how to do it correctly.

Simplified version of my interfaces:

...

ANSWER

Answered 2019-Oct-20 at 11:46

The Liskov Substitution Principle is typically about how you define your classes. If you write a class which derives from some other class (or implements some interface), the idea is that someone should be able to use your class as if it was an instance of that parent class. Your subclass may have additional behaviour which the parent class doesn't have (and someone who's using your class as if it was an instance of the parent class won't be able to access this, of course), but all of the behaviour that the parent class has should stay intact in the child class.

In your example, that might mean defining MagicalWholeBodyArmor which doesn't fit into a Slot, and so throws an exception if you try and access its Slot property. Someone who's treating the MagicalWholeBodyArmor as if it was an IArmor would be in for a surprise when they tried to see what slot it fits into.

The SOLID rule that you code does violate a little bit is the Open/Closed principle. A good rule of thumb for the Open/Closed principle is "If I change this bit of code, how many other bits of code in other places do I also have to change?". If the answer is "lots", then that's probably because you're violating the Open/Closed principle.

In your case, adding a new EquipmentType enum member means that you'll have to go and find that switch statement in your Player class and add a new case.

If there's just the one switch statement, then that isn't too bad. If you add a new type of equipment then your Player class probably needs an upgrade anyway, so modifying the switch statement as part of that is fine. Trying to architect your way around this would mean a significant amount of abstraction for very little gain.

However, if you have lots and lots of switch statements in lots of different places which all look at EquipmentType, (and make different decisions based on it), and you'd need to find them all and fix them all, then that's a bigger violation of the Open/Closed principle, and it's probably an indication that you need to re-architect things to bring all of those separate, disparate bits of logic into a single place.

Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/58472382

Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

Vulnerabilities

No vulnerabilities reported

Install rring

You can download it from GitHub.

Support

For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .

Find more information at: