grim | INFORMATION GATHERER AND VULNERABILITY TESTER TOOL | Security Testing library

Try this code

Use one of the answers from git - how to get default branch? to write an alias which looks up the correct branch name, then use that inside other aliases:

after so much debugging and why invoice array is changing, I noticed that TempInvoice is returning empty Objects. I.e It not been populated, Its null. so I refactored my code to look like this

I would suggest you use setCheck instead of setcheck.

The overall rule here is this: "If a callback is EVER called asynchronously through any code path, then it should always be called asynchronously, even if the result or error is known synchronously."

This is because you NEVER want an API that sometimes calls its callback synchronously and sometimes asynchronous. That makes it very easy for the caller to end up with hard to find and reproduce bugs that only surface when the API itself sometimes calls things synchronously or sometimes calls them asynchronously or sometimes call it one way the first time and then another way the second time.

Here's an example I've seen in the nodejs streams code. There is an API in the streams code that accepts an asynchronous callback. But, as the API starts to process things, it finds that it already has in its buffer the required data to satisfy the API request. It could call the callback synchronously because it already has the data. But, other times, it will have to read data from the disk before calling the callback and thus the callback will be called asynchronously. In the streams code, when it encounters this case where it already synchronously has the data, it still queues the callback to be called on the nextTick because it needs to consistently only return the data asynchronously.

Similarly, sometimes, as part of the setup code for a particular stream API, it encounters an error and that error is known synchronously. Again, it only calls the callback with the error on a nextTick so that it is again being consistent and always calling the callback asynchronously.

But, don't take this too far as this does not mean that every single callback should only ever be called asynchronously on a future tick. It's perfectly OK to have a callback that is always called synchronously as long as the API explains that and the caller expects that. Heck, all the array iteration functions like .map() or .filter() do exactly that and work just fine for what they do and they are massively simpler to use because of their synchronous nature.

In the context of your specific code you show, doing:

Use map in parse_text function so that you get lists separately.

I moved from OPS4j to Aries CDI on Karaf. Here is the how-to:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hFgXPs251po

I couldn't figure out a pandas way to extend the columns, but converting the rows to a dictionary made things easier.

Try this: