curry | See react | Frontend Framework library

Yes, your double lambda approach does work. But there are nicer ways to do this too.

It turns out define can do this directly. The following two pieces of code are identical:

You need to modify your method as

You need to sign the transaction before sending with your account that has ETH balance.

You need to use Signing middleware.

1. If I provide a space(anywhere in text field) it loads everything.

I don't observe that when trying your code. It will happen if your search string contains multiple consecutive spaces because String.split unfortunately does not collapse consecutive instances of the search pattern. For example, 'fooxxxbar'.split('x') will return ['foo', '', '', 'bar']. You later check if any of the tokens from recipeNamesList start with any of those elements, but ''.startsWith(string) is always true.

An easy way to fix that is to essentially collapse whitespace yourself by making the search pattern match one-or-more whitespace characters. That is, replace string.split(' ') with string.split(RegExp(r'\s+')).

Another easy way to fix it is to just continue if encountering an empty token to ignore it.

1. If I type Bengali Curry it returns both Bengali Lamb Curry & 'Chingri Malai Curry'.

Your current algorithm always adds the results list whenever it finds any match. It searches for 'bengali', finds one item, adds it to results, searches for 'curry', finds both of those results, and adds both of them.

Instead of iterating over search tokens in the outer loop and iterating over the recipeNamesList tokens in the inner loop, it would make more sense to iterate over recipeNamesList, and on each iteration, check if all of the search tokens match the tokens of the search string. If so, then add that recipe name to the list of results¹. That also would prevent the same recipe name from being added multiple times without needing to use a Set.

¹ Or if you want fuzzier matching, record a score for each recipe name (e.g. the number of search tokens that were matched), sort the results by the scores, and discard any below a certain threshold.

You can return functions which all:

• have scope of a persistent array of previous arguments
• return a function object with a join property that takes that persistent array and joins it

When you use the ? symbol you are saying that the variable can be null, so you can just check if it's null first, eg:

You are setting the ingredients state as a string, so you are basically 'stringify' a string which will result in JSON SyntaxError. If you want to send an array that way you must specify the array bracket [ and ] in order to make it a valid array.

To solve it just change:

Those are use cases that we explicitly did not want to support since they cause language fragmentation, with many possible dialects supported by macros. I am sure there are good use cases for this, but overall I believe allowing this would be detrimental to the language ecosystem as a whole.

https://contributors.scala-lang.org/t/compatibility-required-for-migration-from-scala2-macro/5100/2?u=giiita

There are two issues in your code:

• The following statement in vymen is the cause of trouble: