metaphore | Cache slam defense using a semaphore to prevent dogpile | Caching library
kandi X-RAY | metaphore Summary
kandi X-RAY | metaphore Summary
PHP cache slam defense using a semaphore to prevent dogpile effect (aka clobbering updates, stampending herd or Slashdot effect). Problem: too many requests hit your website at the same time while it tries to regenerate same content slamming your database, eg. when cache expired. Solution: first request generates new content while all the subsequent requests get (stale) content from cache until it’s refreshed by the first request. Read [for more details.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Caches a cache item .
- Get a value from cache .
- Acquire a lock .
- Prepare TTL .
- Get grace period
- Returns whether the result has a result set .
- Unserialize a string
- Get the result .
- Check if a key exists .
- Returns true if the cache is stale .
metaphore Key Features
metaphore Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on metaphore
QUESTION
This code is really pushing the limits of my understanding so bear with me.
Previously I implemented coroutines in Racket in the following code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Oct-25 at 11:21The gist of your question:
How can I implement an exception handler for coroutines, such that a second thread can send a signal to a thread evaluating a coroutine, forcing it to yield when its running for too long.
And once more:
How can I successfully write a signal handler that will (yield) correctly so that I can resume the coroutine later?
It seems to me that you are not cleanly separating cooperative and preemptive multitasking, since you seem to want to combine coroutines (cooperative) with time-outs (preemptive). (You also mention threads, but seem to conflate them with coroutines.)
With cooperative multitasking there is no way that you can force anyone else to stop running; hence the moniker "cooperative".
With preemptive multitasking you do not need to yield, because the scheduler will preempt you when your allocated time has run out. The scheduler is also responsible for saving your continuation, but it is not the (scheduler's) current continuation, since the scheduler is wholly separate from the user thread.
Perhaps the closest thing to what you are proposing is simulating preemptive multitasking via polling. Every (simulated) timestep (i.e. a VM instruction) the simulation needs to check whether any interrupts/signals have been received by a running thread and handle them.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install metaphore
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page