schema-org | A fluent builder Schemaorg types and ld+json generator | JSON Processing library

 by   spatie PHP Version: 3.14.0 License: MIT

kandi X-RAY | schema-org Summary

kandi X-RAY | schema-org Summary

schema-org is a PHP library typically used in Utilities, JSON Processing, React applications. schema-org has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has medium support. You can download it from GitHub.

A fluent builder Schema.org types and ld+json generator
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              schema-org has a medium active ecosystem.
              It has 1189 star(s) with 129 fork(s). There are 41 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 12 months.
              There are 2 open issues and 77 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 105 days. There are no pull requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of schema-org is 3.14.0

            kandi-Quality Quality

              schema-org has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

            kandi-Security Security

              schema-org has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.
              schema-org code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.
              There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

            kandi-License License

              schema-org is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.
              Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              schema-org releases are available to install and integrate.
              Installation instructions, examples and code snippets are available.
              schema-org saves you 291508 person hours of effort in developing the same functionality from scratch.
              It has 296293 lines of code, 112873 functions and 1800 files.
              It has high code complexity. Code complexity directly impacts maintainability of the code.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi has reviewed schema-org and discovered the below as its top functions. This is intended to give you an instant insight into schema-org implemented functionality, and help decide if they suit your requirements.
            • Shows nodes by type .
            • Parse RDF definitions .
            • Generate docblock .
            • Cast values to PHP types .
            • Serialize a property .
            • Generate package code .
            • Create builder class
            • Generates the types .
            • Get or create a type .
            • Adds a property .
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            schema-org Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for schema-org.

            schema-org Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for schema-org.

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            2 JSON Schema Questions, Is the type keyword required and what is the differencen between Core and Validation
            Asked 2021-Mar-12 at 18:37

            Okay I have been UP and DOWN the internet and I cannot find an answer that DEFINITIVELY answers the following question.

            "Is the type keyword required?" If it is not then can some one, for all that is holy, please, in EXCRUCIATING detail, describe what should happen when it is not provided, validation-wise.

            I have found this...

            http://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/json-schema-validation.html#rfc.section.6.1.1

            But I have found so many other examples where a schema object can be defined and not have this keyword.

            For example I have found this repo with testing examples.

            https://github.com/json-schema-org/JSON-Schema-Test-Suite/blob/master/tests/draft7/additionalProperties.json

            Here they have a schema at line 5. It does not have a type but does look like they are talking about an object. Also on lines 21 - 25 they describe a test where an array is valid.

            Can someone please clarify this for me.

            Also for the second one,... What is the difference between the Core and the Validation as defined here...

            https://json-schema.org/specification.html

            Thank you in advanced

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Mar-12 at 18:31
            1. Is the type keyword required?

            No. Keywords will respond to instances of the types they're designed for, otherwise they will be ignored (silently pass validation). So

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66592329

            QUESTION

            How to refer to another item declaration from multiple other items, to satisfy schema.org?
            Asked 2020-May-26 at 07:21

            After a lot of searching for how to properly refer to one item from another, I found this minimal example that showcases how to refer to an Organization item as a branchOf from a Hotel item. It defines the attribute itemprop="branchOf" on the Organization, which becomes a property of the Hotel item after it references it.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-May-26 at 07:21

            You could use itemid and reference the same itemid from each entity. e.g.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/62011391

            QUESTION

            Deriving property names from values of another enum valued key in jsonschema
            Asked 2020-Mar-13 at 17:19

            Problem :-

            Requirement to allow only those property Names in an object which are part of an array value of another property in the schema (another property's value dependant property names).

            Detailed Explanation :-

            I have the following json

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Mar-13 at 17:19

            Such a problem cannot be solved as on date with json schema where draft 7 being the latest draft while writing this post.

            This question also relates to multiple issues already mentioned in github issues of json-schema spec. Apparently a proposal related to solving such issue is being tracked actively here.

            Since this deals with lookup from the value of instance of json schema and not the structural validation alone (which has been the primary motive of existence of json schema standard as on date), this probably has to be dealt differently as of now until next draft comes or the mentioned issue is taken up.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/60667146

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install schema-org

            You can install the package via composer:.

            Support

            We invest a lot of resources into creating best in class open source packages. You can support us by buying one of our paid products. We highly appreciate you sending us a postcard from your hometown, mentioning which of our package(s) you are using. You'll find our address on our contact page. We publish all received postcards on our virtual postcard wall.
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
            CLONE
          • HTTPS

            https://github.com/spatie/schema-org.git

          • CLI

            gh repo clone spatie/schema-org

          • sshUrl

            git@github.com:spatie/schema-org.git

          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link