addressing | A PHP library that formats international postal addresses | Parser library

addressing of variables in data section

I believe your confusion stems from this idea that your variables are in a separate 'data' section.

Many assemblers will allow you to organize the program in multiple sections like .stack, .data, and .code, and if you do that kind of programming, then the offset address of a data item would not change after inserting an extra instruction.

But your current bootsector code is much simpler. You are not using sections at all. Everything you write gets encoded right where it is.

The code that prints the address occupies 17 bytes.

In the abscense of the 'section 2 instruction', the address of the char1 variable would be 19. That's 17 plus the 2 bytes comming from the jmp $ instruction.

By inserting the 'section 2 instruction', the address of the char1 variable became 22. That's 17 plus the 3 bytes coming from mov bx, char2 plus the 2 bytes coming from the jmp $ instruction.

ps I'm assuming nothing comes before the printing code...

Your GTX770 GPU is a "Kepler" architecture compute capability 3.0 device. These devices were deprecated during the CUDA 10 release cycle and support for them dropped from CUDA 11.0 onwards

The CUDA 10.2 release is the last toolkit with support for compute 3.0 devices. You will not be able to make CUDA 11.0 or newer work with your GPU. The query and bandwidth tests use APIs which don't attempt to run code on your GPU, that is why they work where any other example will not work.

Have you added your app in settings.py -> INSTALLED_APPS.

Simple XML, is - as the name suggests, a very simple implementation and it looks for standard namespaces. You can use registerXPathNamespace to look for non custom ones. See example below that works for your code.

Based on your requirement, you could try to output the variable with the following command:

Add xsl:output with doctype-system:

I can't really explain why, but wrapping the align environment inside display mode $$ and more importantly importing the KaTeX stylesheet just makes it work, at least when testing within a CodeSandbox React sandbox:

If any of the pieces is left out, it is just substituted with zero in the equation.

The book's general rule isn't quite accurate for the scale factor. The default scale factor is 1 if omitted.

x86 index scaling works in machine code as a 2-bit shift count.
That asm default is a shift count of << 0, but x86 asm source-code syntaxes (including AT&T) use multipliers instead of shift counts to represent this, and i << 0 is i * 1.

If you want no index, you need to omit mention of an index register in your addressing mode.

Note that having a default is a property of the assembler / the syntax, in this case AT&T, not of x86 itself. There can't be a "default" in machine code - there's no way to leave out bits in a byte, they have to be either 0 or 1. You either have a SIB byte (scale-index-base) with all fields, or you don't (as signalled by the ModRM byte) in which case there's no index at all.

There is a SIB encoding that means no-index, so in machine code you can still have a SIB byte without an index at all, but you wouldn't describe that as a multiplier of zero.

Some disassemblers represent that encoding as index = %eiz, e.g. in nopl 0(%eax, %eiz, 1) to show that there's a SIB byte but no index, but normally you only ever see that for NOPS. When that SIB-with-no-index is necessary to encode (%esp), it gets simplified to that.)

There are multiple syntaxes for x86 machine code. Although all of the ones I'm aware of agree that no scale just means shift=0, e.g. [str + eax + ecx] in Intel syntax; normally the first register is chosen as the base if there's more than 1, the 2nd as the index.

Of course in Intel syntax, to force ECX to be an index with no base register, you'd need to use [str + ecx*1] to intentionally waste a byte on a SIB encoding.
[str + ecx] in Intel is AT&T str(%ecx).

Also related:

• A couple of questions about [base + index*scale + disp]
• Referencing the contents of a memory location. (x86 addressing modes)
• https://stackoverflow.com/tags/att/info

Finally I have managed to send the non-empty request. I have checked the partner's wsdl using the SoapUI tool and it showed me the correct format of the request. So the correct request has to be the following one: