json-serializer | Serialize PHP variables , including objects | JSON Processing library
kandi X-RAY | json-serializer Summary
kandi X-RAY | json-serializer Summary
This is a library to serialize PHP variables in JSON format. It is similar of the serialize() function in PHP, but the output is a string JSON encoded. You can also unserialize the JSON generated by this tool and have you PHP content back. This project should not be confused with JsonSerializable interface added on PHP 5.4. This interface is used on json_encode to encode the objects. There is no unserialization with this interface, differently from this project.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
- Unserialize an object
- Encodes non - UTF - 8 data to UTF - 8 .
- Decode non UTF - 8 encoded data .
- Serialize object .
- Serialize data .
- Unserialize value .
- Serialize a value .
- Unserialize the value .
- Extract object data .
- Set undefined attribute mode .
json-serializer Key Features
json-serializer Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on json-serializer
QUESTION
I have a class, for example, let's say a Car
with the below structure.
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Oct-21 at 13:11Found the solution for it. Apparently I missed to add one parameter in JsonProperty()
.
In the Car
class, for carOwner
object, I had to pass type of owner.
QUESTION
I have been trying to implement Avro deserialization without confluent schema registry. A quick research shows that I can embed the schema in header before sending the record to topic. But the schema again has to be serialized to bytes before embedding on the header which again makes this problematic. Is there anyway to achieve this?
What are what are the cons associated with this approach.
How is it possible for confluent to extract schema from the data and store it in schema registry? I understood that the schema registry embeds a schema id on the record header while sending the data to topic. Isn't the data serialized before sending to schema registry?
Again if we take a look at the Confluent JsonDeserialzier, it deserializes data without any schema and works with JsonNode. Why isn't a similar mechanism possible for Avro?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Mar-20 at 14:33A quick research shows that I can embed the schema in header before sending the record to topic
If you serialize any object to Avro using BinaryEncoder, that's the default behavior, yes.
the schema again has to be serialized to bytes before embedding on the header
Not sure what you mean "again". For every message, yes, and there's no way around that, but not within the same process of serializing a single record.
What are what are the cons associated with this approach.
There's plenty of documentation about the pros of using a Registry. Cons include maintaining additional infrastructure and not all tools can integrate with it.
How is it possible for confluent to extract schema from the data and store it in schema registry?
Refer source code (extract Schema as text) then POST schema text to the registry to get the ID and embed in the record
Isn't the data serialized before sending to schema registry?
If by "serialized", you mean as Avro, then yes, but the schema is UTF8 serialized
JsonDeserialzier, it deserializes data without any schema and works with JsonNode. Why isn't a similar mechanism possible for Avro?
I think you should be comparing the JsonSchemaDeserializer class. Obviously plain JSON has no concept of schemas. Avro requires a reader schema for deserialization, but there is a similar mechanism - GenericRecord
operates similarly to JsonNode
QUESTION
So simple yet I know not why it fails. In a WebAPI 2.0 ASP.NET MVC (pre-core) controller method, I have this:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Oct-30 at 16:38Most likely ItemVM.firstItem
is not public (for example, internal), and JSON serializer will only serialize public properties by default (unless you non-public property explicitly to be serialized).
QUESTION
As I have previously mentioned, I am using ServiceStack Messaging API (IMessageQueueClient.Publish
) as well as the more low-level IRedisClient.PublishMessage
.
I use the Messaging API when I need a specific message/request to be processed by only one instance of a module/service, so even though I might have several modules running that all listens for MyRequest
, only one service receives the message and processes it.
I use the IRedisClient.PublishMessage
when I do a broadcast, a pub/sub situation, sending a request that everyone should receive that listens on that specific Redis channel.
However, I am in a situation where it would be useful to use the Messaging API, but do a broadcast, so that all instances that are listening to a specific message type, gets the message, not just the one.
(The reason for this is to streamline our usage of Redis and how we subscribe to events/request, but I will not get into details about this now. A little more background on this is here.)
Is there a "broadcast way" for the Messaging API?
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Oct-27 at 18:58No, the purpose of ServiceStack Messaging is simply to invoke ServiceStack Services via MQ. Any other MQ features is outside the purpose & scope of ServiceStack MQ, you'd need to instead develop against the MQ Provider APIs directly to access their broadcast features.
Server Events is a ServiceStack feature that supports broadcasting messages to subscribers of user-defined channels, but its a completely different implementation that serves a different use-case for sending "server push" real-time events over HTTP or gRPC, e.g. it doesn't use MQ brokers and pub/sub messages aren't persistent (i.e. only subscribers at time messages are sent will receive them).
QUESTION
I am trying to use the following API from the package typescript-json-serializer
.
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Oct-07 at 00:56The generic parameter of the constructor is implied by the T annotation on deserialize
. The correct and typesafe syntax is:
QUESTION
While using @EmbeddedKafka(topics = { "checkins" })
I am getting an error
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Sep-09 at 14:39That interface only exists in the kafka_2.12
jars.
It appears you somehow have a 2.12 ...-test
jar and a 2.13
kafka jar (which is not what your gradle says).
What does gradle dependencies
say?
QUESTION
Using c# 8 and .netcore 3.1.
I've read HERE that Utf8Json library process json serialization and deserialization faster that NewtonsoftJson.
We've recently upgraded our servers code from .netcore 2.2 to 3.1 mostly for performance improvements. Thus, it is reasonable that we also use the best serialization library.
So my questions are:
In
...Startup.cs
there is this
ANSWER
Answered 2020-May-07 at 16:28@Ori you can use Utf8json in net core 3.1 projects.
Use
[DataMember(Name = "RoleType")]
public string Role_Type { get; set; }
Instead of
[JsonProperty("")]
To use Utf8json formatters in Asp.Net core you need add the formatters as mentioned below.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install json-serializer
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page