ModuleBuilder | PowerShell Module to help scripters write | Command Line Interface library
kandi X-RAY | ModuleBuilder Summary
kandi X-RAY | ModuleBuilder Summary
A PowerShell Module to help scripters write, version, sign, package, and publish.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of ModuleBuilder
ModuleBuilder Key Features
ModuleBuilder Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on ModuleBuilder
QUESTION
Given the following code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Oct-14 at 13:16I see the following errors in your code. After fixing those I was able to run your without any problems.
QUESTION
I am trying to make a compiler in F# using the API provided in System.Reflection.Emit. I am running into a problem when I try to create functions (delegates) for the types in the assembly that I am currently building. Example translating the following Java (a slightly modified version of Java) class:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Sep-13 at 02:48If I needed to generate the same instruction for a function that uses .NET types, for instance Func, then the above code works perfectly (the types array is
types = [| typeof ; typeof |]
in this case).
TypeBuilder
inherits from Type
, so you just pass the instance that represents the type you're building when you want a reference to that type. In other words, the array you want is types = [| typeBuilder :> System.Type; typeof |]
QUESTION
As you can see in below screencast, manipulating the second input field in my form also changes the value of the first one. I've completely reproduced it on JSfiddle in an isolated environment to track down the bug but didn't find it.
Quick overview of my code base:
A functional component ModuleBuilder has an Array in its state called blocks
and a renderFunction which renders for each element of blocks
one instance of a subcomponent called ModuleElement.
The subcomponent ModuleElement displays an input form element. When I create n instances of the subcomponent and try to type something in the the form element of the second instance then the first one's value gets updated as well.
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Aug-31 at 13:36I was able to solve the problem after coincidentally reading this question.
I replaced the setBlocks line here:
QUESTION
I was trying to migrate .Net Core console app and tests from 2.1 to 3.1 and got a problem in my tests. I was using Moq
library and it was working fine. After migration i started to get A non-collectible assembly may not reference a collectible assembly
when trying to access any mocked objects. I have reproduced same behavior in completely new project. I was not able to find any relevant information on this topic. I have tested it with both MSTest
and Xunit
. Is this a Moq
library issue or .Net Core 3.1 should use different approach to such cases?
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Aug-06 at 13:27For the sake of anyone else landing on this from google...
We are using the latest Rider/ReSharper EAP (2020.2 EAP 8) which has introduced this bug when:
- Running tests via the Rider/ReSharper test runner
- The test project references and uses a mocking library that attempts to generate dynamic proxies (Moq, NSubstitute, etc...)
This has been fixed by JetBrains in their development branch and will be fixed in the next EAP. You can track this here: https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/RIDER-48134
Update: EAP 9 is out which fixes this 🎉 You can use JetBrains Toolbox to update.
QUESTION
I tried and fail to adapt this code. This is dynamic class generator from assembly on C# language. I can't use DynamicObjects because RDLC report doesn't work with none class from System.Dynamic but work great with that class generated by assembly.
What I'm trying to do is to change the property definition from a private variable to a method get and set. Don't need to be a property if it work with two functions will be great.
The code below I have commented the part that I need to change.
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jul-06 at 06:49How about adding the code-to-generate into the target class, like so
QUESTION
To expand on the title, I'm using Reflection to generate a custom subclass that will eventually have an arbitrary number of string properties which they'll internally store in a dictionary. In this case I'm just using one. I've used Ildasm.exe to get the MSIL that I need for the My Set method works, as the debugger shows the value I'm assigning, but when I try to read it back I get an InvalidProgramException, "Common Language Runtime detected an invalid program." which points back to the get method. My get method model is:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-May-08 at 21:59Your immediate problem is that you are using the stloc.0
and ldloc.0
opcodes to read/write into a local without having defined any locals! You can fix that by calling the following at the top of your method:
ilGen.DeclareLocal(typeof(string));
Now here's the thing, the local isn't really required. The code you disassembled and used as your template was obviously compiled in Debug
mode. I can tell this due to the local but mostly from the nop
's. These two things exist in the debug build to aide in the debugging process, allowing you to step in and view the intermediate values. Your getter can be reduced to the following IL:
QUESTION
I work for several days try to shadow base class's property and set the derived class property to protected using Reflection.Emit. When I create a derived class and set new to the base property, call GetProperties() it only show one property with the name and the derived class property is not public, but the dynamic type call GetProperties() show two properties with the same name appear(base property is public and dynamic type is not public). here is my code.
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Apr-02 at 16:27You should use CallingConventions.HasThis
when you define your property :
QUESTION
I come across HasThis
and ExplicitThis
calling conventions on .NET Framework reference source, and thus I begin to wonder:
- When are they set by compiler?
- Are there any examples using this combination of calling conventions (in "real world" managed program)?
MSDN has described them as:
ExplicitThis
Specifies that the signature is a function-pointer signature, representing a call to an instance or virtual method (not a static method). If
ExplicitThis
is set,HasThis
must also be set. The first argument passed to the called method is still athis
pointer, but the type of the first argument is now unknown. Therefore, a token that describes the type (or class) of thethis
pointer is explicitly stored into its metadata signature.
HasThis
Specifies an instance or virtual method (not a static method). At run-time, the called method is passed a pointer to the target object as its first argument (the
this
pointer). The signature stored in metadata does not include the type of this first argument, because the method is known and its owner class can be discovered from metadata.
Here is a sample program I wrote to generate a class and constructor using these bits set:
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Dec-27 at 06:13The first thing that comes to mind about those two flags are Extension Methods, there's even some information on how the binding of those methods is done while the code is being compiled.
Hope it helps!
QUESTION
I created simple program, which dynamically generates GenericEmitExample1.dll
assembly. Such assembly defines following type:
ANSWER
Answered 2019-Nov-18 at 12:37From Section III.2.1 of ECMA-335 (which talks about the constrained
prefix)
Verifiability:
The ptr argument will be a managed pointer (&) to
thisType
. In addition all the normal verification rules of thecallvirt
instruction apply after the ptr transformation as described above. This is equivalent to requiring that a boxedthisType
must be a subclass of the class whichmethod
belongs to.
I think you're falling foul of "This is equivalent to requiring that a boxed thisType
must be a subclass of the class which method
belongs to".
method
in your case is Int32::ToString()
, not Object::ToString()
, and so belongs to int
. However a boxed int
is not a subclass of int
.
In order to use a constrained virtual call here, you would have to call Object::ToString()
, not Int32::ToString()
.
I've verified this by changing the callvirt
instruction to:
QUESTION
I am building a rule checking algorithm that using expression tree, for the type generated using reflection.emit namespace. For some reason i am not able to get it working.
Getting the exception "System.ArgumentException: 'Instance property 'Parameter1' is not defined for type 'System.Object''"
I did try creating dynamic type using expandoObject
instead of reflection.emit
, it did not work
I appreciate it if anybody can help me to solve the problem. Code sample is given.
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Oct-11 at 10:07I have found few issues. First of all, methods should not be generic. You set T
to object
anyway. Instead you should get entity type from ruleInputDataObject
(ruleInputDataObject.GetType()
).
Another problem is the way you're creating lambda in CompileRule
method. You pass want to have lambda with Func
signature and access properties from generated type. This won't work unless you cast parameterExpression
to entity type.
Here is fixed code:
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install ModuleBuilder
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page