ModuleBuilder | PowerShell Module to help scripters write | Command Line Interface library

 by   PoshCode PowerShell Version: v1.0.0-beta0005 License: MIT

kandi X-RAY | ModuleBuilder Summary

kandi X-RAY | ModuleBuilder Summary

ModuleBuilder is a PowerShell library typically used in Utilities, Command Line Interface applications. ModuleBuilder has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities, it has a Permissive License and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

A PowerShell Module to help scripters write, version, sign, package, and publish.
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              ModuleBuilder has a low active ecosystem.
              It has 363 star(s) with 51 fork(s). There are 28 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 12 months.
              There are 12 open issues and 52 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 237 days. There are no pull requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of ModuleBuilder is v1.0.0-beta0005

            kandi-Quality Quality

              ModuleBuilder has no bugs reported.

            kandi-Security Security

              ModuleBuilder has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

            kandi-License License

              ModuleBuilder is licensed under the MIT License. This license is Permissive.
              Permissive licenses have the least restrictions, and you can use them in most projects.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              ModuleBuilder releases are available to install and integrate.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
            Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of ModuleBuilder
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            ModuleBuilder Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for ModuleBuilder.

            ModuleBuilder Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for ModuleBuilder.

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            Emit a factory method
            Asked 2020-Oct-14 at 13:16

            Given the following code:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Oct-14 at 13:16

            I see the following errors in your code. After fixing those I was able to run your without any problems.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64353113

            QUESTION

            Retrieving a delegate type using custom types from an assembly that is currently being built
            Asked 2020-Sep-13 at 17:19

            I am trying to make a compiler in F# using the API provided in System.Reflection.Emit. I am running into a problem when I try to create functions (delegates) for the types in the assembly that I am currently building. Example translating the following Java (a slightly modified version of Java) class:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Sep-13 at 02:48

            If I needed to generate the same instruction for a function that uses .NET types, for instance Func, then the above code works perfectly (the types array is types = [| typeof ; typeof |] in this case).

            TypeBuilder inherits from Type, so you just pass the instance that represents the type you're building when you want a reference to that type. In other words, the array you want is types = [| typeBuilder :> System.Type; typeof |]

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63836238

            QUESTION

            Text entered into an input-field is being duplicated to the state of another input field's value - why?
            Asked 2020-Aug-31 at 19:21

            As you can see in below screencast, manipulating the second input field in my form also changes the value of the first one. I've completely reproduced it on JSfiddle in an isolated environment to track down the bug but didn't find it.

            Quick overview of my code base:

            A functional component ModuleBuilder has an Array in its state called blocks and a renderFunction which renders for each element of blocks one instance of a subcomponent called ModuleElement.

            The subcomponent ModuleElement displays an input form element. When I create n instances of the subcomponent and try to type something in the the form element of the second instance then the first one's value gets updated as well.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Aug-31 at 13:36

            I was able to solve the problem after coincidentally reading this question.

            I replaced the setBlocks line here:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63648500

            QUESTION

            A non-collectible assembly may not reference a collectible assembly
            Asked 2020-Aug-10 at 11:27

            I was trying to migrate .Net Core console app and tests from 2.1 to 3.1 and got a problem in my tests. I was using Moq library and it was working fine. After migration i started to get A non-collectible assembly may not reference a collectible assembly when trying to access any mocked objects. I have reproduced same behavior in completely new project. I was not able to find any relevant information on this topic. I have tested it with both MSTest and Xunit. Is this a Moq library issue or .Net Core 3.1 should use different approach to such cases?

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Aug-06 at 13:27

            For the sake of anyone else landing on this from google...

            We are using the latest Rider/ReSharper EAP (2020.2 EAP 8) which has introduced this bug when:

            • Running tests via the Rider/ReSharper test runner
            • The test project references and uses a mocking library that attempts to generate dynamic proxies (Moq, NSubstitute, etc...)

            This has been fixed by JetBrains in their development branch and will be fixed in the next EAP. You can track this here: https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/RIDER-48134

            Update: EAP 9 is out which fixes this 🎉 You can use JetBrains Toolbox to update.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63077140

            QUESTION

            How to adapt this code to use getter/setter?
            Asked 2020-Jul-07 at 17:22

            I tried and fail to adapt this code. This is dynamic class generator from assembly on C# language. I can't use DynamicObjects because RDLC report doesn't work with none class from System.Dynamic but work great with that class generated by assembly.

            What I'm trying to do is to change the property definition from a private variable to a method get and set. Don't need to be a property if it work with two functions will be great.

            The code below I have commented the part that I need to change.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Jul-06 at 06:49

            How about adding the code-to-generate into the target class, like so

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/62741500

            QUESTION

            System.Reflection.Emit custom property seems to be identical to my mock up, but I get an InvalidProgramException
            Asked 2020-May-08 at 21:59

            To expand on the title, I'm using Reflection to generate a custom subclass that will eventually have an arbitrary number of string properties which they'll internally store in a dictionary. In this case I'm just using one. I've used Ildasm.exe to get the MSIL that I need for the My Set method works, as the debugger shows the value I'm assigning, but when I try to read it back I get an InvalidProgramException, "Common Language Runtime detected an invalid program." which points back to the get method. My get method model is:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-May-08 at 21:59

            Your immediate problem is that you are using the stloc.0 and ldloc.0 opcodes to read/write into a local without having defined any locals! You can fix that by calling the following at the top of your method:

            ilGen.DeclareLocal(typeof(string));

            Now here's the thing, the local isn't really required. The code you disassembled and used as your template was obviously compiled in Debug mode. I can tell this due to the local but mostly from the nop's. These two things exist in the debug build to aide in the debugging process, allowing you to step in and view the intermediate values. Your getter can be reduced to the following IL:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/61685089

            QUESTION

            Dynamic type shadow base class's property and set to protected using Reflection.Emit
            Asked 2020-Apr-03 at 01:33

            I work for several days try to shadow base class's property and set the derived class property to protected using Reflection.Emit. When I create a derived class and set new to the base property, call GetProperties() it only show one property with the name and the derived class property is not public, but the dynamic type call GetProperties() show two properties with the same name appear(base property is public and dynamic type is not public). here is my code.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Apr-02 at 16:27

            You should use CallingConventions.HasThis when you define your property :

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/60986899

            QUESTION

            HasThis & ExplicitThis calling conventions
            Asked 2020-Apr-02 at 16:16

            I come across HasThis and ExplicitThis calling conventions on .NET Framework reference source, and thus I begin to wonder:

            • When are they set by compiler?
            • Are there any examples using this combination of calling conventions (in "real world" managed program)?

            MSDN has described them as:

            ExplicitThis

            Specifies that the signature is a function-pointer signature, representing a call to an instance or virtual method (not a static method). If ExplicitThis is set, HasThis must also be set. The first argument passed to the called method is still a this pointer, but the type of the first argument is now unknown. Therefore, a token that describes the type (or class) of the this pointer is explicitly stored into its metadata signature.

            HasThis

            Specifies an instance or virtual method (not a static method). At run-time, the called method is passed a pointer to the target object as its first argument (the this pointer). The signature stored in metadata does not include the type of this first argument, because the method is known and its owner class can be discovered from metadata.

            Here is a sample program I wrote to generate a class and constructor using these bits set:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2018-Dec-27 at 06:13

            The first thing that comes to mind about those two flags are Extension Methods, there's even some information on how the binding of those methods is done while the code is being compiled.

            Hope it helps!

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53939755

            QUESTION

            Why does PEVerify not recognize valid code?
            Asked 2019-Nov-18 at 12:37

            I created simple program, which dynamically generates GenericEmitExample1.dll assembly. Such assembly defines following type:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2019-Nov-18 at 12:37

            From Section III.2.1 of ECMA-335 (which talks about the constrained prefix)

            Verifiability:

            The ptr argument will be a managed pointer (&) to thisType. In addition all the normal verification rules of the callvirt instruction apply after the ptr transformation as described above. This is equivalent to requiring that a boxed thisType must be a subclass of the class which method belongs to.

            I think you're falling foul of "This is equivalent to requiring that a boxed thisType must be a subclass of the class which method belongs to".

            method in your case is Int32::ToString(), not Object::ToString(), and so belongs to int. However a boxed int is not a subclass of int.

            In order to use a constrained virtual call here, you would have to call Object::ToString(), not Int32::ToString().

            I've verified this by changing the callvirt instruction to:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/58914430

            QUESTION

            How to use run time generated type in expression tree C#
            Asked 2019-Oct-11 at 10:51

            I am building a rule checking algorithm that using expression tree, for the type generated using reflection.emit namespace. For some reason i am not able to get it working.

            Getting the exception "System.ArgumentException: 'Instance property 'Parameter1' is not defined for type 'System.Object''"

            I did try creating dynamic type using expandoObject instead of reflection.emit , it did not work

            I appreciate it if anybody can help me to solve the problem. Code sample is given.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2019-Oct-11 at 10:07

            I have found few issues. First of all, methods should not be generic. You set T to object anyway. Instead you should get entity type from ruleInputDataObject (ruleInputDataObject.GetType()). Another problem is the way you're creating lambda in CompileRule method. You pass want to have lambda with Func signature and access properties from generated type. This won't work unless you cast parameterExpression to entity type.

            Here is fixed code:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/58334188

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install ModuleBuilder

            You can download it from GitHub.

            Support

            For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
            CLONE
          • HTTPS

            https://github.com/PoshCode/ModuleBuilder.git

          • CLI

            gh repo clone PoshCode/ModuleBuilder

          • sshUrl

            git@github.com:PoshCode/ModuleBuilder.git

          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link

            Explore Related Topics

            Consider Popular Command Line Interface Libraries

            ohmyzsh

            by ohmyzsh

            terminal

            by microsoft

            thefuck

            by nvbn

            fzf

            by junegunn

            hyper

            by vercel

            Try Top Libraries by PoshCode

            Configuration

            by PoshCodePowerShell

            Pansies

            by PoshCodeC#

            PSGit

            by PoshCodePowerShell

            PoshCode

            by PoshCodePowerShell

            tldr

            by PoshCodePowerShell