tldr | Simplified , community-driven , example-centric help pages | Command Line Interface library

Using the Developer: Show Running Extensions option inside of the Command Palette (ctrl + shift + p) you can see extension load times.

_{After some digging through, I think I've found another answer.}

After I got your code on my system, and followed all of the steps in your question, it worked correctly on my end.

Maybe you should check your versions of Electron (and Chromium), and update them if needed.

For you, delete the node_modules folder (and package-lock.json, if it helps), and then run the command below again.

Edit: I've rewritten my answer because I hadn't considered the format of the request (raw).

I found two options. Option 1 entails parsing the http request (using http-request-translator) before passing it to the flask test client. Option 2 does the same thing in a much cleaner way making use of low-level Werkzeug modules. Unfortunately, Option 2 doesn't work because of unmaintained code. I've included it anyway, in case someone can maintain/fork the project werkzeug-raw.

app.py:

First of all typeof expects a compile time constant type not a dynamic variable.

So if something it should be e.g.

Well, its a bit complicated, but the simplest answer is that it is typically used to denote a character (letters, etc.) versus numeric values. For example, I would code this object without quotes:

Currently there is no way to programmatically connect a GitHub repo to a Google Cloud Project. This must be done manually via Google Cloud.

My workaround is to manually connect an "admin" project, build containers and save them to that project's artifact registry, and then deploy the containers from the registry in the programmatically generated project.

It looks like the Node.js process is running as a different user (not as you), and that user has a different path from your account (or at least, it isn't running any .bashrc or similar specific to your user account that might add to the path). That makes sense given that your result refers to a folder specific to you (/Users/xxx/), but the one from Node.js refers to a central location shared by all users.

In the OP's example with std::max, an ODR violation does indeed occur, and the program is ill-formed NDR. To avoid this issue, you might consider one of the following fixes:

• give the doMath function internal linkage, or
• move the declaration of kTwo inside doMath

A variable that is used by an expression is considered to be odr-used unless there is a certain kind of simple proof that the reference to the variable can be replaced by the compile-time constant value of the variable without changing the result of the expression. If such a simple proof exists, then the standard requires the compiler perform such a replacement; consequently the variable is not odr-used (in particular, it does not require a definition, and the issue described by the OP would be avoided because none of the translation units in which doMath is defined would actually reference a definition of kTwo). If the expression is too complicated, however, then all bets are off. The compiler might still replace the variable with its value, in which case the program may work as you expect; or the program may exhibit bugs or crash. That's the reality with IFNDR programs.

The case where the variable is immediately passed by reference to a function, with the reference binding directly, is one common case where the variable is used in a way that is too complicated and the compiler is not required to determine whether or not it may be replaced by its compile-time constant value. This is because doing so would necessarily require inspecting the definition of the function (such as std::max in this example).

You can "help" the compiler by writing int(kTwo) and using that as the argument to std::max as opposed to kTwo itself; this prevents an odr-use since the lvalue-to-rvalue conversion is now immediately applied prior to calling the function. I don't think this is a great solution (I recommend one of the two solutions that I previously mentioned) but it has its uses (GoogleTest uses this in order to avoid introducing odr-uses in statements like EXPECT_EQ(2, kTwo)).

If you want to know more about how to understand the precise definition of odr-use, involving "potential results of an expression e...", that would be best addressed with a separate question.

It's because subprocess.run is blocking itself - you need to run shell command in background e.g. if you have asnycio loop already on, you could use subprocesses